摩訶止觀 5.271

5.271

竪破亦有亦無見、非有非無見，如上菩提心中，釋名絕待中示其相也。若謂心亦生亦不生者，為是何等亦生亦不生？為是見不生而真生？為是思不生而真生？為是習不生而真生？為是塵沙不生通用生？為是無明不生中道生？為是內業不生外業生？為是內報不生外報生？為是小行不生大行生？為是偏理不生圓理生，而言亦生亦不生？若非如此等亦生亦不生，非見何謂？

The vertical refutation of the view of both existence and nonexistence, and the view of neither existence nor nonexistence, is shown in its characteristics as above in the bodhicitta section, under the explanation of the name in 'transcending relativity'. If you say the mind both arises and does not arise, what sort of both arising and not arising is it? Is it that views do not arise while the real arises? Is it that desires do not arise while the real arises? Is it that habits do not arise while the real arises? Is it that dust and sand do not arise while shared functions arise? Is it that avidyā does not arise while the middle way arises? Is it that internal karma does not arise while external karma arises? Is it that internal retribution does not arise while external retribution arises? Is it that lesser practice does not arise while great practice arises? Is it that partial principle does not arise while perfect principle arises, such that you speak of both arising and not arising? If it is not these kinds of both arising and not arising, what could it be called other than a view?