釋禪波羅蜜次第法門 1.137

1.137

問曰：上第四、明禪詮次及下第七、辨修證中，皆先明有漏，次亦有漏亦無漏，次無漏，次非有漏非無漏。今分別四句法，何故異於前後，乃以三為二也？

Question: In the fourth section above, clarifying the sequential order of dhyāna, and below in the seventh section, distinguishing cultivation and realization, all first explain the defiled, next the both defiled and undefiled, next the undefiled, and next the neither defiled nor undefiled. Now in analyzing the dharmas of the four propositions, why does it differ from before and after, placing the third as the second?