法智遺編觀心二百問 1.120

1.120

問：《大意》約三無差別，染、淨明其假觀，此假空中明三諦觀。仁何違彼內觀，不觀生佛三千？違文違義何可言耶？

Question: The Dayi, on the basis of the three being without distinction, explains the contemplation of provisionality in terms of defilement and purity, and within this provisionality and emptiness it explains the contemplation of the three truths. Why do you contradict that internal contemplation and not contemplate the three thousand [realms] of sentient beings and buddhas? How could such contradiction of text and contradiction of principle even be spoken of?