法智遺編觀心二百問 1.190

1.190

問：仁《答疑書》中引此文正圓談法性義同理觀，理觀既不達陰驗，仁當時不知約行須觀陰心。若不爾者，何故引此證無陰理觀耶？

Question: In your Dayi shu you cited this text, stating that directly and perfectly discussing the Dharma-nature is equivalent to the contemplation of principle. Since the contemplation of principle does not penetrate the skandhas as proof, you did not know at that time that based on practice one must contemplate the mind of the skandhas. If this were not so, why did you cite this to prove contemplation of principle without the skandhas?