法智遺編觀心二百問 1.189

1.189

問：予引《義例》唯達法性不云達陰。既是端坐十乘，豈不達陰為法性？用例攝事成理，雖不云入陰，後觀解中既立陰境，驗須攝事入陰觀理方名攝事成理，仁那枉云意謂法性不關三千耶？

Question: I cited the Yili as 'only penetrating the Dharma-nature' without mentioning penetrating the skandhas. Since this is sitting upright in the ten vehicles, how could it not penetrate the skandhas as Dharma-nature? Using this as an analogy for subsuming phenomena to consummate principle, although it does not speak of entering the skandhas, since the object of the skandhas is later established in the contemplation explanation, this proves that one must subsume phenomena into the skandhas to contemplate principle before it can be called subsuming phenomena to consummate principle. Why do you falsely claim that the intent means Dharma-nature is unrelated to the three thousand?