法智遺編觀心二百問 1.36

1.36

問：仁立十法，只是三諦異名，故具觀心義。既類法無眾生，彼約所觀、所顯，能觀、能顯，能破、能破，助道、正道，自行、利物論三法，此既一向是所顯諦理，安類彼文具觀心義耶？

Question: You establish that the ten dharmas are simply different names for the three truths, and thus possess the meaning of contemplation of mind. Since you compare them to 'dharma without sentient beings', which discusses the three dharmas in terms of the contemplated and the revealed, the contemplating and the revealing, the refuting and the refuted, the auxiliary path and the primary path, and one's own practice and benefiting beings—whereas this is entirely the principle of the truths to be revealed—how can you compare it to that text as possessing the meaning of contemplation of mind?