四明十義書 1.159

1.159

又上人只將內心若淨之句對止觀理境（全不敢言觀為多所妨也。如此牽率，何能評教），乃將此境遍歷外法，則大違《止觀》。以彼具於識陰修乎十乘，然後將此十乘歷於作受，何曾單將理境歷事耶？

Furthermore, your reverence merely matches the phrase 'if the internal mind is purified' with the objective realm of principle in Zhiguan (completely not daring to mention contemplation because of numerous contradictions; being so strained, how can you critique the teachings?), and then takes this realm to range comprehensively across external dharmas; this greatly violates Zhiguan. For in that text, one possesses the cultivation of the ten vehicles with respect to the aggregate of consciousness, and only then ranges these ten vehicles across actions and receptions; when has it ever taken the objective realm of principle alone to range across phenomena?