四明十義書 1.45

1.45

至予將別立陰入為境教文示之，乃轉執云：我本自問於陰揀境諸文所無，不問通立陰境。將此欲暫延邪計。且諸文揀示陰入為境，雖不全同止觀，而文義非無。應知修事法觀者不妨揀境。

When I showed him doctrinal passages that separately establish the aggregates and sense bases as the object, he then shifted his stubborn assertion, saying: 'What I originally asked was whether selecting the object within the aggregates is absent in the various texts; I did not ask about generally establishing the object of the aggregates.' With this he wishes to temporarily prolong his perverse scheme. However, although selecting and pointing out the aggregates and sense bases as the object in the various texts is not completely identical to Zhiguan, the text and meaning are not absent. One should know that those who practice the contemplation of phenomena and teachings are not prevented from selecting the object.