四明十義書 1.48

1.48

又云三界無別法，唯是一心作。此正當去尺就寸，唯取識陰總無明心也。既云唯是一心作，得非揀取無明識陰耶？此云棄三觀一，彼云唯一心作。此云心為光，則想行為明；彼云一心成觀，轉教餘心。此則彼此揀示陰境，彼此觀成遍融，何計曲拗令不同耶，又諸文既許立陰為境，此文的示陰中識心，有何等過？

It also says: 'The three realms have no separate dharmas; they are made solely by the one mind.' This precisely corresponds to leaving the foot and approaching the inch, taking only the aggregate of consciousness, which sums up the mind of fundamental ignorance. Since it says 'made solely by the one mind,' could it not be selecting and taking the ignorance consciousness aggregate? Here it says 'discard three and contemplate one,' whereas there it says 'made solely by the one mind.' Here it says 'mind is light, then perception and formations are brightness,' whereas there it says 'contemplation is accomplished in the one mind, which in turn transforms the remaining minds.' Both select and point out the object of the aggregates, and in both, when contemplation is accomplished, it pervasively harmonizes—by what contrivance of crooked twisting can they be made different? Furthermore, since the various passages permit establishing the aggregates as the object, what fault is there in this text's explicit pointing to the conscious mind within the aggregates?