四明十義書 2.109

2.109

不思此說招過極多。何者？若將果佛十種法相入心修觀，自是附法觀心，何得却云是約行所顯？況復此玄正釋料揀十法，唯有所附之法，全無能附之觀。尚略無附法觀義，那有約行觀義？

You do not consider that this assertion incurs extremely numerous errors. How so? If one introduces the fruit Buddha's ten kinds of dharmas into the mind to cultivate contemplation, that is naturally appending to teachings to contemplate the mind; how can you turn around and say it is what is revealed in terms of practice? What is more, this Xuan[yi], in directly explaining and selecting the ten dharmas, contains only the dharmas to be appended to, and entirely lacks the contemplation that can append to them. When it does not even slightly have the meaning of contemplation appending to teachings, how could it have the meaning of contemplation in terms of practice?