四明十義書 2.130

2.130

況上人刀刀明說正釋十法全無修二性一之義，又云不二門只約緣了正三因對論離合，今來何得却據三德三涅槃是修二性一云具觀心義耶？豈非因予前後詰難，得知正釋有於離合之義，便竊此義將為己解，而返將此義立於十種三法為理觀也。

What is more, you repeatedly and clearly stated that the ten dharmas in the principal explanation completely lack the meaning of 'two cultivated and one of the nature', and you also said that the *Gate of Non-duality* only discusses separation and combination in terms of the three causes of conditioned, illuminating, and direct [Buddha-nature]. How can you now instead rely on the three virtues and three nirvāṇas being 'two cultivated and one of the nature' to say that they possess the meaning of contemplating the mind? Is it not because of my successive interrogations that you came to know that the principal explanation contains the meaning of separation and combination, and then stole this meaning to take as your own understanding, turning around to establish this meaning in the ten threefold dharmas as principle contemplation?