四明十義書 2.150

2.150

又答疑書及今來義狀，堅執《淨名疏》釋法無眾生，結為三種解脫無非觀心，不須更作觀心釋之。欲將此十種三法亦具觀心義，不須更立觀心一科。此更不知彼此文意也。

Furthermore, in your *Letter Answering Doubts* and your present statement of points, you rigidly cling to the *Jingming shu*'s explanation that 'dharmas have no sentient beings'—concluding that the three kinds of liberations are nothing other than contemplating the mind, without needing to make a further explanation of contemplating the mind. You wish to have these ten threefold dharmas likewise possess the meaning of contemplating the mind, without needing to establish an additional section on contemplating the mind. In this, you fail even more to understand the intent of both texts.