四明十義書 2.151

2.151

且《淨名疏》與此玄文雖同明三法，須知立義永殊。彼約研心作觀，觀成稱理，依體起用。而談，故具觀心義。此約佛果己證之理而說，安可得同？

Moreover, although the *Jingming shu* and the text of this *Xuanyi* both clarify threefold dharmas, you must know that the meanings they establish are eternally disparate. That work speaks in terms of examining the mind to engage in contemplation, where the completion of contemplation accords with principle, giving rise to function based on essence; therefore it possesses the meaning of contemplating the mind. This work speaks in terms of the principle already realized in the fruit of Buddhahood; how could they be identical?