四明十義書 2.45

2.45

又彼經與此經，俱論果中三法皆真。恐章安例此十法觀心，故特略於彼也。豈得却例彼略而廢此具耶？

Furthermore, both that sūtra and this sūtra discuss the three dharmas in the fruit as all being true. Fearing that Zhang'an might take the contemplation of the mind on these ten dharmas as a general precedent, he specifically omitted it in that text. How can you now use its omission as a precedent to abolish its presence here?