四明十義書 2.76

2.76

上人於《辨訛》將果理貫於六即之義，立為純談理觀。故問疑書約心佛高下、觀境難易之義難之，故云：教文明簡佛法太高初心難觀，故令觀於心法。何故違教，特棄心法而取佛法為觀境耶？

In your Bian'e, you established that the principle of the fruit pervades the six identities as purely discussing principle contemplation. Therefore, the Letter of Inquiries challenged this by the sense of the high and low of mind and buddha, and the difficulty and ease of the contemplation object, stating: "The textual passages of the teaching clearly select [the object, stating that] the Buddha-dharma is too high and difficult for beginners to contemplate, and therefore instruct one to contemplate the mind-dharma. Why do you violate the teachings, deliberately abandoning the mind-dharma to take the Buddha-dharma as the object of contemplation?"