四明十義書 2.77

2.77

上人遭斯難故，乃知錯將果法妄為理觀，便乃於答疑書內欺心妄轉云：何甞棄心取佛。若了十法雖殊、一理無二者，還用無二之解（前後皆將解字為觀，今來抵諱，謂念念圓解在圓談法性。足見妄語也。何故？此文將解照性也）照無二之性，上與諸佛等、下與眾生齊。豈是棄心取佛耶（何嘗下除注，皆答疑書文）？

Having encountered this challenge, you realized you had mistakenly taken the fruit dharma as principle contemplation, and then, in your Letter Answering Doubts, deceptively and erratically changed your position, saying: "When have I ever abandoned mind to take Buddha? If one realizes that although the ten dharmas differ, the single principle is not dual, one simply uses the non-dual understanding (earlier and later you always equated the word 'understanding' with 'contemplation'; now you dissemble, saying that thought-moment-by-thought-moment perfect understanding consists in the perfect discourse on dharmatā. This is sufficient to show your deceit. Why? This text takes understanding as illuminating the nature) to illuminate the non-dual nature, equal above with all buddhas and aligned below with sentient beings. How is this abandoning mind to take Buddha?" (the text from "when have I ever" onwards, excluding the notes, is from the Letter Answering Doubts).