四明尊者教行錄 2.60

2.60

十三問：理消伏義，鈔自簡云：是則惑性相待，非闕智斷。今詰曰：理消伏義既云非關約行智斷，為指理境非關智斷耶？為約迷事非關智斷耶？為據性德之行非關智斷耶？為並約四義非關智斷耶？

Question 13: Regarding the sense of theoretical eradication and subduing, the Commentary itself screens it out, saying: 'This being so, delusion and nature are mutually relative; it is not lacking in wisdom and eradication.' Now I interrogate: Since you say that the sense of theoretical eradication and subduing does not concern wisdom and eradication in terms of practice, does it point to the theoretical realm not concerning wisdom and eradication? Or does it not concern wisdom and eradication in terms of the phenomena of delusion? Or does it not concern wisdom and eradication based on the practice of inherent virtue? Or does it not concern wisdom and eradication in terms of all four meanings combined?