四明尊者教行錄 3.11

3.11

Question 2: Fazang's commentary also says: 'The Consciousness-Only school has not yet clarified that the karmic marks and suchness share the one mind as their single source; therefore it says that suchness lacks awareness and cognition, is statically unchanging, and does not allow for following conditions.' Since Jingxi explained that in the separate teaching a single thought of sense-bases and sense-objects is the source of delusion and awakening, and said that the Tathāgata as nature of principle is the root of good and evil, is it not the case that the karmic marks and suchness share the one mind as the source of producing dharmas? This being so, how can you say the separate principle does not follow conditions?