Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

四明尊者教行錄 3.20

English (machine translation) 3.20

Language
English

3.20

The eleventh query: Fazang's commentary clearly determines that ālayavijñāna is the root of arising dharmas, hence calling it the differentiated teaching, whereas revealing that true thusness is the root of arising dharmas is called the final teaching. If you now already believe that the principle of the separate [teaching] is non-abiding and able to create the myriad dharmas, if it does not accord with conditions, how could it create dharmas?

Linked texts (1)