Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

宗鏡錄 69.33.2

宗鏡錄 69.33.2

Language
Classical Chinese

69.33.2

五陰本因。 同是妄想。 汝體先因父母想生。 汝心非想。 則不能來想中傳命。 如我先言。 心想酸味。 口中涎生。 心想登高。 足心酸起。 懸崖不有。 酸物未來。 汝體必非虛妄通倫。 口水如何因談酸出。 是故當知。 汝現色身。 名為堅固第一妄想。 即此所說。 臨高想心。 能令汝形。 真受酸澁。 由因受生。 能動色體。 汝今現前順益違損。 二現驅馳。 名為虛明。 第二妄想。 由汝念慮。 使汝色身。 身非念倫。 汝身何因。 隨念所使。 種種取像。 心生形取。 與念相應。 寤即想心。 寐為諸夢。 則汝想念。 搖動妄情。 名為融通。 第三妄想。 化理不住。 運運密移。 甲長髮生。 氣消容皺。 日夜相代。 曾無覺悟。 阿難。 此若非汝。 云何體遷。 如必是真。 汝何無覺。 則汝諸行。 念念不停。 名為幽隱。 第四妄想。 又汝精明。 湛不搖處。 名恒常者。 於身不出見聞覺知。 若實精真。 不容習。 妄。 何因汝等。 曾於昔年。 覩一奇物。 經歷年歲。 憶忘俱無。 於後忽然覆覩前異。 記憶宛然。 曾不遺失。 則此精了。 湛不搖中。 念念受熏。 有何籌算。 阿難當知。 此湛非真。 如急流水。 望如恬靜。 流急不見。 非是無流。 若非想元寧受想習。 非汝六根互用合開。 此之妄想無時得滅。 故汝現在見聞覺知。 中。 串習幾。 則湛了內。 罔象虛無。 第五顛倒。 細微精想。 阿難。 是五受陰。 五妄想成。 汝今欲知因界淺深。 唯色與空。 是色邊際。 唯觸及離。 是受邊際。 唯記與忘。 是想邊際。 唯滅與生。 是行邊際。 湛入合湛。 歸識邊際。 此五陰元。 重疊生起。 生因識有。 滅從色除。 理則頓悟。 承悟併消。 事非頓除非次第盡。 是以若見五陰有。 即眾生世間。 若了五陰空。 即真諦世間。 若達五陰實相。 即中道第一義正智世間。 難此五陰三世間外。 更無一法能建能立。 為。 俗為真。 一代時教所詮。 除此別無方便。 悟此成佛。 迷此為凡。 唯是一心。 開合無異。 何者。 以一陰名色。 四陰名心。 從心所生。 故稱為色。 心是所依。 色是能依。 攝能歸所。 但是一心。 本末元同。 體用常合。 宗鏡大旨。 於此絕言。 破六入文云。 佛告阿難。 譬如有人。 勞倦則眠。 睡熟便寤。 覽塵斯憶。 失憶為忘。 是其顛倒生住異滅。 吸習中歸。 不相逾越。 稱意知根。 兼意與勞。 同是菩提瞪發勞相。 因于生滅二種妄塵。 集知居中。 吸撮內塵。 見聞逆流。 流不及地。 名覺知性。 此覺知性。 離彼寤寐生滅二塵。 畢竟無體。 如是阿難。 當知如是覺知之根。 非寤寐來。 非生滅有。 不於根出。 亦非空生。 何以故。 若從寤來。 寐即隨滅。 將何為寐。 必生時有。 滅即同無。 令誰受滅。 若從滅有。 生即滅無。 孰知生者。 若從根出。 寤寐二相。 隨身開合。 離斯二體。 此覺知者。 同於空華。 畢竟無性。 若從空生。 自是空知。 何關汝入。 是故當知。 意入虛妄。 本非因緣。 非自然性。 釋曰。 此破意入也。 疏云。 覽塵斯憶者。 憶即是生。 失憶為忘者。 忘即是滅。 失憶不離自心。 妄謂為境。 故云是其顛倒生住異滅。 吸習中歸不相逾越者。 吸習生住異滅。 歸識心內。 故云中歸。 前念滅。 後念生。 無雜亂失。 故云不相逾越。 故經云。 心性生滅。 猶如猿猴。 當知見境生滅者。 即是自心生滅相故。 故云心生種種法生。 吸撮內塵。 見聞逆流。 流不及地。 名覺知性者。 謂眼耳取外塵境。 剎那流入意地。 從外入內。 名為逆流。 眼耳唯緣現境。 至第二念緣不及故。 故云流不及地。 唯意根獨取。

"The fundamental cause of the five aggregates is equally deluded conception. Your body was first produced through the conception of your parents; if your mind were not conceived, it could not come to transmit life within conception. As I have said before: when the mind conceives of a sour taste, saliva is produced in the mouth; when the mind conceives of ascending a height, the soles of the feet experience a tingling ache. The precipitous cliff is not there, and the sour object has not arrived: if your physical body were not of the same category as deluded unreality, how could saliva come forth because of talking about sourness? Therefore you should know that your present form-body is named the first deluded conception, which is solidity. As was just said, the mind conceiving of overlooking a height can make your form genuinely experience a tingling ache; because feeling arises, it can move the body of form. Your present favorable benefit and adverse harm, these two appearances driving each other, are named the second deluded conception, which is illusory clarity. Because of your thoughts and reflections, you direct your physical body. The body is not of the same category as thought; why then does your body follow what thought directs? Taking various images, the mind arises and the form grasps them, corresponding with thought: waking, it is the conceiving mind; sleeping, it becomes dreams. Thus your conceiving thoughts perturb deluded sentiments; this is named the third deluded conception, which is interpenetration. The principle of transformation does not abide; it imperceptibly shifts at every moment: nails grow and hair emerges, energy wanes and wrinkles appear on the face; day and night they replace each other, and you are never aware of it. Ānanda! If this were not you, why would your substance alter? If it were certainly your real self, why are you unaware of it? Thus your various formations, never stopping from moment to moment, are named the fourth deluded conception, which is latent obscurity. Furthermore, the essential clarity of yours, at the place where it is serene and unmoving, is called the permanent; within the body it does not go beyond seeing, hearing, sensing, and knowing. If it were truly pure and real, it would not admit habituated delusion. Why did you once in past years see a strange object, and as years passed by, there was neither remembering nor forgetting, yet afterwards, when suddenly beholding that past oddity again, the memory was clear and vivid, never having been lost? Then within this essential clarity, serene and unmoving, it is perfumed moment to moment—how could it be calculated? Ānanda, you should know that this serenity is not real; it is like a rushing stream of water that looks tranquil from afar, but because the flow is so rapid, it is not seen, yet it is not that there is no flow. If it were not the source of conception, how could it receive habituated conceiving? Unless your six faculties mutually function, joining and opening, this deluded conception will never be extinguished. Therefore within your present seeing, hearing, sensing, and knowing, there are subtle habituations; within the serene clarity, they are like shadowy non-entities, the fifth inverted, subtle essential conception. Ānanda, these five aggregates of clinging are accomplished by the five deluded conceptions. If you now wish to know the shallowness and depth of their causal boundaries: form and emptiness alone are the boundary of form; contact and separation alone are the boundary of feeling; remembering and forgetting alone are the boundary of conception; cessation and arising alone are the boundary of formations; serenity entering and merging into serenity returns to the boundary of consciousness. The sources of these five aggregates arise in overlapping layers: arising is caused by the existence of consciousness, while cessation is eliminated beginning with form. In principle, there is sudden awakening, and following awakening they simultaneously vanish; in phenomena, they are not suddenly eliminated, but exhausted step by step." Therefore, if one sees the five aggregates as existing, that is the world of sentient beings. If one realizes that the five aggregates are empty, that is the world of the truth of reality. If one reaches the true mark of the five aggregates, that is the world of correct wisdom of the middle way, the primary meaning. Apart from these three worlds of the five aggregates, there is not a single dharma that can be posited or established as conventional or as real; what is explained throughout the teachings of an entire lifetime offers no other skillful means than this. Awakened to this, one becomes a Buddha; deluded about this, one is an ordinary being. It is only the one mind; its expansion and contraction are not different. Why? Because one aggregate is named form, and four aggregates are named mind. Arising from the mind, it is therefore called form. Mind is the support; form is that which is supported. When that which is supported is gathered back to the support, there is only the one mind. Root and branch are fundamentally identical; substance and function are eternally joined. The great purport of the Mirror of the Source brings an end to words here. In refuting the six sense bases, the text states: "The Buddha told Ānanda, 'For example, when a person is weary, they sleep; having slept soundly, they then wake. Observing sense objects, they remember; losing memory, they forget. These are the inverted arising, abiding, changing, and ceasing, which are inhaled and habituated, returning inside, not transgressing one another; this is called the mental sense faculty. Both this mind and the weariness are equally manifestations of fatigue from staring bodhi. Based on the two kinds of deluded sense objects of arising and ceasing, gathered knowing dwells within, grasping inner sense objects; seeing and hearing flow in reverse, but the flow does not reach the ground; this is called the nature of sensing and knowing. This nature of sensing and knowing, apart from these two objects of waking and sleeping, arising and ceasing, has ultimately no substance. Thus, Ānanda, you should know that such a faculty of sensing and knowing does not come from waking or sleeping, does not exist from arising or ceasing, does not issue from the sense faculty, and is not produced from emptiness. Why? If it came from waking, sleep would immediately cease along with it—what would be used for sleeping? If it necessarily existed at the time of arising, ceasing would be identical to nonexistence—who would be made to experience ceasing? If it existed from ceasing, upon arising it would be ceased and nonexistent—who would know arising? If it issued from the sense faculty, the two marks of waking and sleeping open and close according to the body; apart from these two substances, this sensing and knowing is identical to flowers in the sky, ultimately devoid of nature. If it were produced from emptiness, it would naturally be the knowing of emptiness; what would it have to do with your sense base? Therefore you should know that the mental sense base is delusive and unreal; it is fundamentally neither causes and conditions nor a spontaneous nature.'" Explanation: This refutes the mental sense base. The commentary says: "'Observing sense objects, they remember'—remembering is arising. 'Losing memory, they forget'—forgetting is ceasing. Losing and remembering are not separate from one's own mind, yet one deludedly considers them to be external objects. Therefore it says, 'These are the inverted arising, abiding, changing, and ceasing.' 'Inhaled and habituated, returning inside, not transgressing one another' means that arising, abiding, changing, and ceasing are inhaled and habituated, returning within the conscious mind, hence 'returning inside.' The preceding thought ceases and the subsequent thought arises without disorder or confusion, hence 'not transgressing one another.' Thus the sūtra says: 'The nature of mind arises and ceases just like an ape.' One should know that seeing objects arise and cease is precisely the mark of the arising and ceasing of one's own mind. Therefore it is said, 'When the mind arises, various dharmas arise.' 'Grasping inner sense objects; seeing and hearing flow in reverse, but the flow does not reach the ground; this is called the nature of sensing and knowing' means that the eyes and ears grasp external sense objects, which instantly flow into the ground of the mind; coming from the outside to the inside is called 'flowing in reverse.' The eyes and ears only take present objects as conditions; by the second moment, their conditioning cannot reach them, hence 'the flow does not reach the ground'; the mental sense faculty alone grasps them."

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)