宗鏡錄 51.47

51.47

Answer: This is merely a rhetorical flourish by the commentator. It was distinguished out of the previously mentioned shared inconclusive fallacy, and is only a semblance of the fallacy of decisive contradiction with the intrinsic nature of the predicate, not a genuinely existing one. Due to this factor, the reason "subsumed under the first three and not subsumed under the eye" is posited, mutually eliminating various inconclusivenesses, contradictions, and other fallacies. Next is the explanation of inserting words to eliminate fallacies.