廣弘明集 8.71

8.71

斯皆三張之鬼法。豈老子之懷乎。自於上代爰至符姚。皆呼眾僧以為道士。至寇謙之。始竊道士之號。私易祭酒之名。事簡姚書略可詳究。然法行經者。無有人翻。雖入疑科未傷弘旨。摩訶迦葉釋迦弟子。稟道闡猷。詎希方駕三張符錄。詭託老言捃採譎詞。以相扶助。復引實談證其虛說。嗚呼可歎。幸深察焉。

These are all the ghostly methods of the Three Zhangs; how could they be what Laozi harbored? From antiquity down to the Fu and Yao regimes, all Buddhist monks were called "Daoshi" (masters of the Dao). Only with Kou Qianzhi was the title of Daoshi first usurped, secretly changing the designation of Jijiu ("libationer"). The matter is recorded in the books of the Yao dynasty and can be examined in brief. Now, as for the Faxing jing, no one translated it; though it falls into the category of doubtful texts, it does not harm the grand purport. Mahākāśyapa was a disciple of Śākyamuni, who received the Dao and expounded the teachings; how could he wish to stand shoulder to shoulder with the talismans and registers of the Three Zhangs? Falsely imputing their views to the words of Laozi and gathering deceptive phrases to bolster each other, they again cite true discourses to substantiate their empty assertions. Alas, how lamentable! May you scrutinize this deeply.