出三藏記集 3.7

3.7

祐校安公舊錄。其經有譯名則繼錄上卷。無譯名者則條目于下。尋安錄。自修行本起訖於和達。凡一百有三十四經。莫詳其人。又關涼二錄並闕譯名。今總而次列入失源之部。安錄誠佳。頗恨太簡。注目經名撮題兩字。且不列卷數行間相接。後人傳寫名部混糅。且朱點為標。朱滅則亂。循空追求困於難了。斯亦璵璠之一玷也。且眾錄雜經苞集逸異名多復重失相散紊。今悉更刪整標定卷部使名實有分尋覽無惑焉。

Sengyou collated Master Dao'an's old catalogue: where the sūtra had the translator's name, it followed in the roll above; where there was no translator's name, it was itemized below. Looking into Dao'an's catalogue, from the *Xiuxing benqi* down to the *Heda*, there are one hundred and thirty-four sūtras in all whose translators are unknown. Furthermore, the two catalogues of Guanzhong and Liangzhou both lacked the translators' names. Now I have combined and arranged them in sequence into the section of lost provenances. Master Dao'an's catalogue is truly fine, yet I rather regret that it was overly concise: focusing on the sūtra titles, he abbreviated them into two characters, and moreover did not list the roll numbers, with the lines running continuously into one another. Later copyists mixed and confused the titles and categories; furthermore, red dots were used as markers, and when the red pigment faded away, confusion ensued. Pursuing them in this void, one is hampered by the difficulty of understanding. This is truly a blemish on fine jade. In addition, miscellaneous sūtras from various catalogues were gathered together along with lost and unusual texts, with many names duplicated, and their lost states scattered and disordered. Now I have re-excised and rearranged them entirely, demarcating the rolls and sections so that name and reality are distinguished and those who study them will have no perplexity.