開元釋教錄 8.6
開元釋教錄 8.6
- Language
- Classical Chinese
8.6.1
寶星陀羅尼經十卷(或八卷見內典錄貞觀三年三月於興善寺出四年四月訖沙門法
琳製序佛於大集會中重說此經即大集寶幢分是非重譯也)
般若燈論釋十五卷(龍樹菩薩本分別明菩薩釋見內典錄貞觀四年六月於勝光寺出
至六年十月十七日畢沙門慧賾製序)
大乘莊嚴經論十三卷(或十五卷無著菩薩造見內典錄貞觀四年夏於勝光寺
與般若燈論同時出至七年春訖勅太子右庶子李百藥為序)
右三部三十八卷其本並在。
沙門波羅頗迦羅蜜多羅。唐言作明知識。略
云朋友。或一云波頗。唐言光智。中印度人
也。本剎利王種。姓剎帝利。十歲出家隨師習
學。誦一洛叉大乘經可十萬偈。受具已後便
學律藏。既通戒網心樂禪思。又隨勝德修習
定業。因循不捨經十二年。末復南遊摩伽陀
國那蘭陀寺。值戒賢論師盛弘十七地論。因
復聽採。以此論中兼明小教。又誦一洛叉偈
小乘諸論。波頗識度通敏器宇沖邃。博通內
外研精大小。傳燈教授同侶所推。承化門人
般若因陀羅跋摩等。學功樹勣深達義綱。相
繼領徒本國匡化。為彼王臣之所欽重。但以
出家釋子不滯一方。六月一移任緣靡定。承
北狄貪勇未識義方。法藉人弘敢欲傳化。乃
與道俗十人展轉北行。達西面可汗葉護衙
所。以法訓勗。曾未浹旬。特為戎主。深所信
伏。日給二十人料旦夕祗奉。同侶道俗咸被
珍遇。生福增敬日倍於前。武德九年高平王
出使入蕃因與相見。承此風化將事東歸。而
葉護君臣留戀不許。王即奏聞下勅徵入。乃
與高平同來謁帝。以貞觀元年歲次丁亥十
一月二十日達京勅住興善。釋門英達莫不
修造。自古教傳詞旨有所未喻者。皆委其宗
緒括其同異。內計外執指掌釋然。徵問相詶
披解無滯。乃上簡聞蒙引內見。躬傳法理無
爽對揚。賜綵四十段并宮禁新納一領。所將
五僧加料供給。重頻慰問勞接殊倫。至三年
三月上以諸有非樂物我皆空。睠言真要無
過釋典。流通之極豈尚翻傳。下詔所司搜𫾻
碩德兼閑三教備舉十科者一十九人。於大
興善創開傳譯。沙門玄謨僧伽等譯語。及三
藏同學崛多律師證譯。沙門法琳慧明慧賾
慧淨等執筆。承旨慇懃詳覆。審定名義具意
成文。沙門慧乘法常慧朗曇藏智解智首僧
辯僧珍道岳靈佳文順等證義。又勅上柱國
尚書左僕射刑國公房玄齡散騎常侍太子
詹事杜正倫禮部尚書趙郡王李孝恭等參助
詮定。右光祿大夫太府卿蘭陵男蕭璟總知監
護。百司供送四事豐華。至四年四月譯寶星
經訖。後移勝光又譯般若燈論大莊嚴經論。
至七年春勘閱既周繕寫云畢。所司詳讀乃
上聞奏。下勅各寫十部散流海內。仍賜頗物
百段。餘承譯僧有差束帛。波頗意在傳法餘
無挂懷。而時輩不詢。或生異議云。頗僥倖時
譽取馳於後。故聚名達廢講經論。斯未是弘
通者。時有沙門靈佳。卓犖拔群妙通機會。對
監護使具述事理云。頗遠投東夏情乖名利。
欲使道流千載聲振上古。昔符姚兩代翻經
學士乃有三千。今大唐譯人不過二十。意在
明德同證信非徒說。後代昭奉無疑於今耳。
識者僉議攸同後遂不行。時為太子染患眾
治無効。下勅延頗入內一百餘日。親問承對
不虧帝旨。疾既漸降辭出本寺。賜綾帛等六
十段并及時服十具。頗誓傳法化不憚艱危。
遠度𦵇河來歸震旦。經途所亘四萬有餘。躬
齎梵文望並翻盡。不言英彥有墜綸言。大志
頹然雅懷莫訴。因而遘疾自知不救。分散衣
資造諸淨業。端坐觀佛遺表施身。下勅特聽。
尋爾而卒於勝光寺。春秋六十有九。東宮下
令給二十人。輿屍坐送至于山所。闍維既了。
沙門玄謨收拾餘骸為之起塔於勝光寺。在
乘法師塔東。即貞觀七年四月六日也。有識
同嗟。法輪輟軫。群生無導。良可悲夫(內典錄云于斯時也
大集梵文將事廣傳陶津後代而恨語由唐化弘匠不行致使梵寶無由分布故十載之譯三部獻功可悲深矣今
Ratnatārā-dhāraṇī-sūtra, ten fascicles (or eight fascicles; recorded in the Neidian Lu; translated at Xingshan Temple starting in the third month of the third year of Zhenguan and completed in the fourth month of the fourth year; preface composed by the śramaṇa Falin; the Buddha preached this sūtra again during a great assembly; it is the Ratnaketu section of the Mahāsaṃnipāta, and is not a retranslation).
Prajñāpradīpa-śāstra-ṭīkā, fifteen fascicles (root text by the Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna, commentary by the Bodhisattva Bhāviveka; recorded in the Neidian Lu; translated at Shengguang Temple beginning in the sixth month of the fourth year of Zhenguan and completed on the seventeenth day of the tenth month of the sixth year; preface composed by the śramaṇa Huize).
Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra-śāstra, thirteen fascicles (or fifteen fascicles; composed by the Bodhisattva Asaṅga; recorded in the Neidian Lu; translated at Shengguang Temple simultaneously with the Prajñāpradīpa in the summer of the fourth year of Zhenguan, and completed in the spring of the seventh year; by imperial order Li Baiyao, Right Mentor to the Crown Prince, composed the preface).
The above three works in thirty-eight fascicles are all extant.
The śramaṇa Prabhākaramitra, translated into Tang [Chinese] as "Zuoming Zhishi" (Light-maker Friend), abbreviated as "Pengyou" (Friend); also called Bopo, translated into Tang [Chinese] as "Guangzhi" (Luminous Wisdom); was a native of Central India. He was originally of kṣatriya royal stock, with the surname Kṣatriya. At the age of ten, he left home and studied following his master, reciting one lakṣa (roughly one hundred thousand verses) of Mahāyāna sūtras. After receiving full ordination, he immediately studied the Vinayapiṭaka. Having mastered the net of precepts, his mind delighted in dhyāna contemplation. Furthermore, following eminent and virtuous masters, he practiced the discipline of samādhi, continuing without abandonment for twelve years. Later, he traveled south to Nālandā Temple in Magadha, where he met the treatise master Śīlabhadra vigorously propagating the Treatise on the Seventeen Stages [the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra], and consequently listened to and learned it. Because this treatise also illuminates the Hīnayāna teachings, he additionally recited one lakṣa of verses from various Hīnayāna treatises. Bopo's intellect and discernment were penetrating and agile, and his capacity profound. He was thoroughly versed in both inner and outer disciplines, investigating the Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna exhaustively. Transmitting the lamp and providing instruction, he was esteemed by his peers. Disciple followers receiving his transformation, such as Prajñāindravarman and others, excelled in their studies, established merits, and deeply comprehended the essential principles; they successively led followings to guide and convert people in their native land, and were revered by the king and ministers there. However, as an ordained disciple of the Śākya, he would not linger in one place, moving every six months and letting conditions follow their course without fixity. Hearing that the northern barbarians were greedy and fierce, not yet knowing moral principles, and that the Dharma relies upon people to be propagated, he boldly wished to travel and convert them. Thereupon, together with ten monks and laymen, he journeyed by stages to the north, arriving at the court of the Western Qaghan, the Yabghu. He instructed and admonished them with the Dharma. In less than ten days, the barbarian ruler came to revere and submit to him deeply, providing daily provisions for twenty people and attending on him morning and evening. His companions, both monastic and lay, all received rare favor, generating merit and increasing their respect daily to twice what it was before. In the ninth year of Wude, the Prince of Gaoping was sent as an envoy into barbarian territories and met him there; hearing of this influence and transformation, he planned to return east with him, but the Yabghu and his ministers were reluctant to let him go. The Prince immediately memorialized the throne, and an imperial decree summoned him to enter [the capital]. He thus came together with Gaoping to have an audience with the Emperor. On the twentieth day of the eleventh month of the first year of Zhenguan, the year Dinghai, he arrived at the capital, and an imperial decree ordered him to reside at Xingshan Temple. The eminent and accomplished of the Buddhist order all came to pay their respects. Whenever there were ancient teachings transmitted whose phrasing and import were not yet understood, he thoroughly analyzed their lineages, gathered their agreements and differences, and dispelled inner convictions and external attachments as clearly as pointing to his own palm. In fielding inquiries and answering, his explanations were free of obstruction. A memorial was presented to the throne, and he was granted an audience in the inner palace; presenting the principles of the Dharma in person, his responses matched the occasion without flaw. He was bestowed forty bolts of colored silk and one newly tailored robe from the palace, while the five monks he had brought were granted extra provisions. He was repeatedly comforted and inquired after, receiving extraordinary receptions. In the third month of the third year, the Emperor, considering that all existence is without joy and that self and phenomena are both empty, remarked that the true essentials do not surpass the Buddhist scriptures, and that in bringing them to full circulation, what could be better than translating them? He issued an edict ordering the relevant authorities to seek out and recommend nineteen eminent masters who were versed in the Three Teachings and fully qualified in the ten disciplines, to inaugurate translations at the Great Xingshan Temple. The śramaṇas Xuanmo, Saṅgha, and others translated the words, and the Tripiṭaka master's fellow-student, Vinaya Master Guptā, verified the translations. The śramaṇas Falin, Huiming, Huize, Huijing, and others recorded them with the brush; respectfully receiving the instructions, they meticulously reviewed them, verifying the names and meanings, and completing the text with full comprehension of the sense. The śramaṇas Huicheng, Fachang, Huilang, Tancang, Zhijie, Zhishou, Sengbian, Sengzhen, Daoyue, Lingjia, Wenshun, and others verified the meaning. An imperial edict also commissioned the Grand Pillar of State, Vice-Director of the Left of the Department of State Affairs, and Duke of Xingguo, Fang Xuanling; the Cavalier Attendant-in-Ordinary and Supervisor of the Crown Prince's Household, Du Zhenglun; and the Minister of Rites and Prince of Zhaojun, Li Xiaogong, to assist in evaluating and determining [the text]. Xiao Jing, Grand Master for Splendid Happiness on the Right, Chamberlain for the National Treasury, and Baron of Lanling, held general oversight as monitor. The various offices supplied the four requisites in abundance and magnificence. In the fourth month of the fourth year, the translation of the Ratnatārā-sūtra was completed. Later, moving to Shengguang Temple, he further translated the Prajñāpradīpa-śāstra and the Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra-śāstra. By the spring of the seventh year, the collation was complete and the copying was finished. The authorities read it in detail and presented a memorial to the throne. An imperial edict commanded that ten copies of each be transcribed and disseminated throughout the realm, and Bopo was granted one hundred bolts of silk, with varying bundles of silk awarded to the remaining translating monks. Bopo's intention lay solely in propagating the Dharma, with no other concern in mind. Yet contemporaries did not inquire closely, and some raised dissenting opinions, claiming: "Bopo seeks present fame through good fortune and aims to make a name for the future; therefore he gathers famous and eminent figures, abandoning the lecturing on sūtras and śāstras; this is not the way to propagate widely." At that time, there was a śramaṇa named Lingjia, outstanding and extraordinary, who possessed wonderful insight into opportune moments. Before the imperial supervisor-commissioner, he fully recounted the circumstances and rationale, saying: "Bopo has cast himself far into the eastern realm, his mind removed from fame and profit. He wishes to make the Dao flow for a thousand years, making its fame echo that of antiquity. In the past, during the two dynasties of Fu and Yao, the scholars translating scriptures numbered as many as three thousand. Now, the translators of the Great Tang do not exceed twenty. The aim is for illustrious virtues to testify jointly, ensuring that it is not mere empty talk, so that future generations will revere it with clear understanding and harbor no doubts as they do today." Those of discernment all agreed with this opinion, and the objections subsequently ceased. At that time, the Crown Prince fell ill, and various treatments proved ineffective. An imperial edict invited Bopo into the palace for more than one hundred days; his direct responses to royal inquiries did not fail the Emperor's expectations. Once the illness gradually subsided, he took his leave and departed back to his home temple, being bestowed sixty bolts of damask and silk along with ten sets of seasonal clothing. Bopo had vowed to transmit the Dharma transformation, fearless of hardships and perils. Crossing the Pamir River from afar, he arrived in China, traveling a journey extending over forty thousand li. Bearing Sanskrit texts in person, he hoped to translate them all. He had not anticipated that eminent scholars would fall short of the imperial decree; his great aspiration collapsed, and his refined feelings could find no vent. He consequently fell ill, and knowing he could not recover, he distributed his robes and funds to perform various pure deeds; sitting upright, contemplating the Buddha, he submitted a final memorial offering his body. An imperial edict specially granted permission. Soon thereafter, he died at Shengguang Temple at the age of sixty-nine. The Crown Prince's palace issued an order assigning twenty people to carry his corpse in a seated posture, conveying it to the mountain site. After the cremation was completed, the śramaṇa Xuanmo collected the remaining relics and erected a stūpa for him at Shengguang Temple, east of Master Cheng's stūpa, which took place on the sixth day of the fourth month of the seventh year of Zhenguan. Those of discernment lamented together: the wheel of the Dharma had halted its chariot, and living beings were left without a guide—how truly sorrowful! (The Neidian Lu states: At this time, the Sanskrit text of the Mahāsaṃnipāta was about to be broadly transmitted to nourish future generations; yet it is regrettable that, because the language was transformed into Tang [Chinese], the great masters did not proceed, with the result that the Sanskrit treasures had no way of being distributed. Thus, through ten years of translation, only three works showed merit—truly deeply lamentable! Now
8.6.2
考覈序中譯時年月三年三月創譯七年春獻功畢續高僧傳云六年訖傳錄俱是宣修年月自矛盾也)。
破邪論二卷(或一卷見內典錄)
辯正論八卷(見內典錄)
右二部十卷其本見在。
沙門釋法琳。姓陳氏。頴川人。遠祖隨官寓居
襄陽。少而出家遊獵儒釋博綜詞義。金陵楚
郢從道問津。自文苑才林靡不尋造。而意存
綱梗不營浮綺。野栖木食於青溪等山。晝則
承誨佛經。夜則吟覽俗典。故於內外詞旨經
緯遺文。精會所歸咸肆其抱。而風韻閑雅韜
德潛形。氣揚采飛方陳神略。隋季承亂入關
觀化。流離八水顧步三秦。每以槐里仙宗互
陳名實。昔在荊楚梗槩其文。而祕法奇章猶
未探括。自非同其形服塵其本情。方可體彼
宗師靜茲紛結。乃權捨法服長髮多年。外統
儒門內希聃術。遂以義寧初歲。假被巾褐從
其居館。琳素通莊老談吐清奇。道侶服其精
華膜拜而從遊處。情契莫二共敘金蘭。故彼
所禁文詞竝用諮琳取定。致令李宗奉釋之
典包舉具舒。張偽葛妄之言銓題品錄。武德
初運還莅釋宗。擁帙延光栖遑問道。以帝壤
同歸名教。是則鼓言鄭衛易可箴規。乃住京
師濟法寺。至武德四年有太史令傅奕。先是
黃巾深忌佛法。上廢佛法事十有一條云。釋
經誕妄言妖事隱。損國破家未聞益世。請胡
佛邪教退還天竺。凡是沙門放歸桑梓。則家
國昌大李孔之教行焉。武皇容其小辯。朝輔
未能抗也。時謂遵其邪徑通廢宏衢莫不懼
焉。乃下詔問曰。棄父母之鬚髮。去君臣之
章服。利在何間之中。益在何情之外。損益二
宜請動妙適。琳憤激傅詞側聽明勅。承有
斯問即陳對曰。琳聞。至道絕言。豈九流能
辯。法身無象。非十翼所詮。但四趣茫茫漂
淪欲海。三界蠢蠢顛墜邪山。諸子迷以自焚。
凡夫溺而不出。大聖為之興世。至人所以降
靈。遂開解脫之門。示以安隱之路。於是中天
王種。辭恩愛而出家。東夏貴遊。厭榮華而入
道。誓出二種生死。志求一妙涅槃。弘善以
報四恩。立德以資三有。此其利益也。毀形以
成其志。故棄鬚髮美容。變俗以會其道。故去
君臣華服。雖形闕奉親。而內懷其孝。禮乖事
主。而心戢其恩。澤被怨親以成大順。福沾
幽顯豈拘小違。上智之人。依佛語故為益。下
凡之類。虧聖教故為損。懲惡則濫者自新。進
善則通人感化。此其大略也。而傅氏所奏。在
司猶未施行。奕乃多寫表狀。遠近公然流布。
京室閭里。咸傳禿丁之誚。劇談酒席。昌言胡
鬼之謠。佛日翳而不明。僧尼阻而無勢。于
時達量道俗動毫成論者非一。各踈佛理具
引梵文。委示業緣曲垂邪正。但竝是奕之所
廢。豈有引廢證成。雖曰破邪終歸邪破。琳情
性玄機獨覺千載。器局天授博悟生知。覩作
者之無功。信乘權之有據。乃著破邪論二卷。
用擬傅詞文。有三十餘紙。自琳之綴釆貫絕
群篇。野無遁賢朝無遺士。家藏一本咸誦在
心。竝流略之菁華。文章之冠冕。茂譽於是乎
騰廣。昏情由之而開尚矣。琳又以論卷初出
意在弘通。自非廣露其情。則皂隷不塵其道
乃上啟儲后諸王及公卿侯伯等。竝文理弘
被庶績咸嘉其博詣焉。故奕奏狀因之致寢。
遂得釋門重敞。琳寔其功。東宮庶子虞世南。
詳琳著論。乃為之序胤。而傅氏不愜其情。重
施密𧮂。構扇黃巾用為黨類。道士李仲卿上
十異九迷論。道士劉進喜上顯正論。皆貶量
佛聖塵點釋宗。昏冒生靈衒曜朝野。薰蕕既
雜時所疑焉。武德九年春下詔京置三寺惟
立千僧。餘竝放還桑梓。嚴勅既下莫敢致詞。
五眾哀號於槀街。四民顧歎於城市。于時道
俗蒙然投骸無措。賴由震方出帝氛祲廓清。
素襲啟聞薄究宗領。登即大赦還返神居。
故佛日重朗於唐世。又由琳矣。琳頻逢黜陟
誓結維持。道挫世情良資寡學。乃探索典籍
隱括玄奧。撰辯正論八卷。頴川陳子良注之
并製序。良文學雄伯群儒仰戴。誘勸成則其
Checking the dates of translation in the prefaces, [it is found that] the translation began in the third month of the third year and the meritorious work was completed and presented in the spring of the seventh year; the Continued Biographies of Eminent Monks states that it was finished in the sixth year. Both biography and catalogue were compiled by [Dao]xuan, yet their dates contradict each other).
Po xie lun (Treatise on Refuting the Heterodox), two fascicles (or one fascicle, see the Neidian lu).
Bian zheng lun (Treatise on Discerning the Orthodox), eight fascicles (see the Neidian lu).
The above two works in ten fascicles are both extant.
Śramaṇa Shi Falin had the secular surname Chen and was a native of Yingchuan. His remote ancestors followed official postings to reside in Xiangyang. In his youth he left household life, read widely in Confucianism and Buddhism, and synthesized literary elegance and profound meaning. Traversing Jinling and Chu-Ying, he sought the Way and inquired about its paths; from the forest of literary scholars, there was none he did not visit. Yet his mind was set on the essential principles, and he did not cultivate superficial ornament. He lived in the wilds and ate forest fruits on Mount Qingxi and elsewhere; by day he received instruction in Buddhist sūtras, and by night he chanted and perused secular classics. Thus, regarding the inner and outer expressions and purport, the classical and apocryphal texts, he thoroughly mastered their conclusions and fully gave vent to his aspirations. His demeanor was graceful and refined, and he veiled his virtue and hid his form; only when his spirit soared and his brilliance shone did he reveal his marvelous strategies.
Toward the end of the Sui, facing disorder, he entered the passes to observe its cultural transformation, drifting along the Eight Rivers and strolling across the Three Qin. He constantly heard the Daoists of Huaili debate name and reality with [Buddhism]. Formerly, when in Jingchu, he had only grasped the broad outlines of their texts, while their secret rites and extraordinary scriptures remained unplumbed. Concluding that unless he took on their appearance and clothing, mingling his outward inclinations with theirs, he could not comprehend their ancestral masters or calm these confused knots, he temporarily laid aside the monastic robes and let his hair grow for many years. Outwardly he took command of Confucian studies; inwardly he aspired to the arts of Laozi. Thus, in the first year of Yining, he assumed a cloth cap and coarse robes, joining their lodges. Falin was already conversant with Zhuangzi and Laozi, and his conversation was clear and remarkable; the Daoist companions admired his brilliance and bowed down to follow him in his travels. Their rapport was singular, and together they pledged deep friendship. Therefore, all their restricted writings and expressions were submitted to Falin for final determination, so that the scriptures of the Li clan that exalted the Buddha were all brought forward and fully unfolded, and the spurious tales of Zhang [Daoling] and Ge [Hong] were appraised and catalogued.
At the beginning of the Wude era, he returned to the Buddhist school, embracing the texts, extending the light, and diligently seeking the Way. Considering that within the imperial realm all revered moral instruction, so that the improper music of Zheng and Wei could easily be corrected, he took up residence at Jifa Temple in the capital. By the fourth year of Wude, the Grand Astrologer Fu Yi—who had previously been a Daoist and deeply resented the Buddhadharma—submitted an eleven-article memorial urging the abolition of the Buddhadharma, claiming: "The Buddhist scriptures are fantastical and absurd, their language is demonic, and their matters are obscure; they harm the state and ruin families, with no heard-of benefit to the world. We request that the barbarian Buddha's heterodox teachings be returned to India, and that all śramaṇas be sent back to their native places; then the family and the state will prosper, and the teachings of Laozi and Confucius will prevail." Emperor Gaozu tolerated his minor eloquence, and the court ministers were unable to counter him. At that time, it was feared that following his heterodox path would lead to the total abolition of the great avenue, and everyone was terrified.
The Emperor then issued an imperial edict questioning: "Renouncing the hair and beard given by parents, and casting off the ceremonial robes of lord and minister: within what bounds lies the benefit, and beyond what sentiments lies the advantage? As between loss and benefit, please explain the precise truth." Falin, indignant at Fu's words, listened intently to the clear decree. Learning of this inquiry, he immediately submitted a response, saying: "Falin has heard that the supreme Way transcends words—how could the nine schools debate it? The Dharma-body has no image—it cannot be expounded by the Ten Wings. Yet the four destinies are vast and drift drowned in the sea of desire; the three realms teem and tumble down the mountain of heterodoxy. The children are deluded and burn themselves; ordinary mortals sink and cannot emerge. For their sake the Great Sage appeared in the world, and the Perfected One descended in spirit. He thereupon opened the gate of liberation and revealed the path of peace. Thus in Central India the royal families severed affectionate love to leave household life, and in the Eastern Xia the nobles, weary of glory, entered the Way. They vow to transcend the two kinds of birth and death, and aspire to seek the one wondrous nirvāṇa; they propagate the good to repay the four kindnesses, and establish virtue to support the beings of the three realms. This is their benefit. They alter their appearance to fulfill their resolve, and thus cast off the beard, hair, and handsome adornment; they transform worldly customs to accord with the Way, and thus discard the splendid garments of lords and ministers. Although in form they fail to serve their parents, inwardly they cherish filial piety; though in ritual they depart from serving their ruler, in their hearts they harbor gratitude. Their grace extends to enemies and kin alike, achieving great compliance; their blessing reaches the seen and the unseen—how could it be constrained by small transgressions? For persons of superior wisdom, relying on the Buddha's words brings benefit; for ordinary beings of inferior capacity, transgressing the sacred teachings brings harm. Chastising evil leads wrongdoers to reform themselves; advancing good inspires discerning people to transformation. Such is the broad outline."
Yet although the memorial submitted by Fu [Yi] was not yet implemented by the authorities, Yi made numerous copies of his memorial and publicly distributed them far and wide. Throughout the lanes and alleys of the capital, the mockery of 'bald-headed knaves' was spread; in boisterous talk at wine banquets, rumors of 'barbarian ghosts' were loudly voiced. The sun of the Buddha was eclipsed and lost its light; monks and nuns were thwarted and had no influence. At that time, many among the discerning clergy and laity picked up their brushes and composed treatises, each explaining Buddhist principles and citing Sanskrit texts at length, giving detailed accounts of karmic retributions and distinguishing heterodoxy from orthodoxy. However, these were all things that Yi rejected; how could citing what he rejected serve to prove anything? Though claiming to refute the heterodox, in the end they fell prey to the heterodox themselves. Falin’s nature possessed profound insight, an awakening unmatched in a thousand years; his capacity was heaven-bestowed, possessing innate and broad comprehension. Seeing that the other authors had achieved nothing, and believing in the validity of skillful means, he composed the Po xie lun in two fascicles, designed to counter Fu's text, running to over thirty sheets. Once Falin's polished prose was composed, it surpassed all other writings; no worthy remained hidden in the wilds, and no scholar was overlooked at court. Every household kept a copy, reciting it by heart. It was indeed the finest of literary anthologies, the crowning glory of all compositions. His illustrious fame spread widely, and deluded minds were thereby awakened.
Furthermore, as this treatise was newly produced and Falin's intention was to propagate it broadly—for unless his sentiments were widely disclosed, ordinary people would not turn their attention to this path—he submitted it to the Crown Prince, the various princes, and the court ministers and nobles. Its style and reasoning were so sweeping that all the officials praised its extensive reach. Consequently, Fu's memorial was shelved, and the gate of Buddhism was reopened; this was truly Falin's achievement. Yu Shinan, Vice Mentor to the Crown Prince, examined Falin's treatise and composed a preface for it. Yet Fu [Yi] remained dissatisfied and again engaged in covert slander, inciting the Daoists to form a faction. The Daoist Li Zhongqing submitted the Shi yi jiu mi lun (Treatise on Ten Differences and Nine Delusions), and the Daoist Liu Jinxi submitted the Xian zheng lun (Treatise on Manifesting the Orthodox), both belittling and criticizing the Buddha and the sages, defiling the Buddhist tradition, blinding living beings, and misleading both court and commoners. As the fragrant and the foul were thus mixed, the times were filled with doubt.
In the spring of the ninth year of Wude, an imperial edict decreed that only three monasteries be maintained in the capital, supporting only one thousand monks, and that the rest be returned to their native places. Once the stern edict was issued, none dared speak out. The five assemblies cried out in grief along the official roads; the four classes of people looked on and sighed in the marketplaces. At that time, clergy and laity were bewildered and had nowhere to turn, until from the eastern direction the Emperor arose and the pestilential mists were swept clear. Accustomed to what he had heard, he investigated the essentials, and immediately upon ascending the throne granted a general amnesty, restoring the monks to their sacred dwellings. That the sun of the Buddha shone brightly once more during the Tang was again due to Falin. Falin, having repeatedly faced demotions and promotions, vowed to preserve the teachings; seeing that the Way was thwarted by worldly sentiments, he relied on his profound learning. He then explored the scriptures, extracted the profound mysteries, and compiled the Bian zheng lun in eight fascicles. Chen Ziliang of Yingchuan annotated it and composed a preface. Ziliang’s literary standing was preeminent, and the host of scholars looked up to him; his encouragement was such that...
8.6.3
從如雲。貞觀初。文帝捨終南山大和舊宮。
置龍田寺。琳性欣幽靜就而住之。眾所推美
舉知寺任。從容山服詠歌林野。三年勅波頗
三藏翻寶星經及般若燈等論。召琳令執筆
承旨兼詳覆名義。至十三年冬有黃巾秦世
英者。挾方術以要榮。遂程器於儲貳。素嫉釋
種陰陳琳論謗訕皇宗罪當誷上。帝勃然下
勅沙汰僧尼。見有眾侶宜依遺教。仍訪琳
身據法推勘。琳扼捥奮發不待追徵。獨詣公
庭輕生徇理。乃縶以縲紲。下詔問曰。周之宗
盟異姓為後。尊祖重親寔由先古。何為追逐
其短首尾兩端廣引形似之言。備陳不遜之
喻。圮毀我祖禰。謗讟我先人。如此要君罪
有不恕。琳答曰。文王大聖周公大賢。追遠慎
終昊天靡答。孝悌之至通於神明。雖有宗周
義不爭長。何者。皇天無親竟由輔德。古人黨
理而不黨親。不自我先不自我後。雖親有罪
必罰。雖疎有功必賞。賞罰理當故天下和平。
老子習訓道宗德教加於百姓。恕己謙光仁
風刑于四海。又云。吾師名佛。佛者覺一切
人也。乾竺古皇西昇逝矣。討尋老教始末可
追。日授中經示誨子弟言。吾師者善入泥洹
綿綿常存吾今逝矣。今劉李所述謗滅老氏
之師世莫能知。著茲辯正論有八卷。略對道
士六十餘條。竝陳史籍前言實非。謗毀家國。
自後辯對二十餘列。並據琳詞具狀聞奏。
勅曰。所著辯正論信毀交報篇曰。有念觀
音者臨刃不傷。且赦七日令爾自念。試及刑
決能無傷不。琳外纏桎梏內迫刑期。水火交
懷訴仰無路。乃緣生來所聞經教及三聖尊
名銘誦心府擬為顯應。至于限滿忽神思彯
勇橫逸胸懷。歡慶相尋頓忘死畏立待對
問。須臾勅至云。今赦期已滿當至臨刑。有何
所念。念有靈不。琳援筆答曰。自隋季擾攘四
海沸騰。伇毒流行干戈競起。興師相伐各擅
兵威。臣佞君荒不為正治。遏絕王路固執一
隅。自皇王弔伐載清陸海。斯寔觀音之力。咸
資勢至之恩。比德連蹤道齊上聖。救橫死於
帝庭。免淫刑於都市。琳於七日已來不念觀
音惟念陛下。勅治書侍御韋琮問琳。有詔令
念觀音。何因不念乃云惟念陛下。琳答。伏承
觀音聖鑒塵形六道。上天下地皆為師範。然
大唐光宅四海九夷奉職。八表刑清君聖臣
賢不為枉濫。今陛下子育恒品如經即是觀
音。既其靈鑒相符。所以惟念陛下。且琳所著
辯正論爰與書史倫同。一句參差任從斧鉞。
陛下若順忠順正。琳則不損一毛。陛下若刑
濫無辜。琳則有伏屍之痛。具以事聞。遂不加
罪。有勅徙于益部僧寺。行至百牢關菩提寺。
因疾而卒。時年六十九。沙門慧序經理所苦
情結斷金。曉夕同衾慰撫承接。及命將盡在
序膝上。序慟哭崩摧淚如駛雨。乃召諸關旁
道俗。葬於東山之頂。高樹白塔勒銘誌之。行
路望者知便下淚。琳所著詩賦啟頌碑表章
誄大乘教法并諸論記傳合三十餘卷。並金
石擊其風韻。縟錦繢其文思流靡雅便騰焰
彌穆。又善應機說導即事騁詞言會宮商義
符玄籍。其秦英竟以狂慝被誅公私怪其死。
晚劉李傅氏相從化往。故其遺文往行。可為
萬代錧轄矣。
大般若波羅蜜多經六百卷(見翻經圖佛於四處十六會說顯慶五年正月
一日於玉華宮寺玉華殿譯至龍朔三年十月二十日畢沙門大乘光大乘欽嘉尚等筆受)
能斷金剛般若波羅蜜多經一卷(見內典錄第四出與姚秦
羅什等出者同本貞觀二十二年十月一日於坊州宜君縣玉華宮弘法臺譯直中書杜行顗筆受)
般若波羅蜜多心經一卷(見內典錄第二出與摩訶般若大明呪經等同本貞
觀二十三年五月二十四日於終南山翠微宮譯沙門知仁筆受)
大菩薩藏經二十卷(見內典錄今編入寶積當第十二會貞觀十九年五月二日於西京
弘福寺翻經院譯至九月二日畢沙門智證筆受道宣證文)
大乘大集地藏十輪經十卷(見內典錄是大集第十三分與舊方廣十輪同
followers gathered like clouds. At the beginning of the Zhenguan era, Emperor Taizong gave up the former Dahe Palace on Mount Zhongnan to establish Longtian Temple. By nature Lin delighted in seclusion and quiet, so he went there to reside. Recommended and praised by the community, he was elected to oversee the affairs of the temple. In unhurried ease in his mountain robes, he chanted and sang in the forests and wilds. In the third year, an imperial decree ordered the Tripiṭaka master Prabhākaramitra to translate the Bao xing jing (Ratnatārā-dhāraṇī-sūtra) as well as the Prajñāpradīpa-śāstra and other treatises, summoning Lin to serve as scribe receiving the meaning and to critically verify terms and doctrines. By the winter of the thirteenth year, there was a Daoist yellow-turban named Qin Shiying, who used occult arts to seek glory and thereby displayed his talents before the Crown Prince. Having long harboured enmity toward the Śākya lineage, he covertly submitted Lin’s treatise, asserting that it slandered the imperial lineage and that his crime constituted deceiving the sovereign. The Emperor, enraged, issued an edict to purge the monks and nuns, directing that the existing monastic assembly should abide by the posthumous teachings, and furthermore commanded that Lin himself be sought out and interrogated according to the law. Clenching his fists in vigorous resolve, Lin did not wait to be summoned, but went alone to the official court, holding his life lightly in sacrifice for the truth. He was then bound in fetters. An imperial decree was issued demanding:
“In the ancestral alliances of the Zhou, those of different surnames came second; revering ancestors and honouring kin indeed stem from antiquity. Why have you pursued shortcomings, wavering between both ends, extensively quoting superficial words, and fully setting forth disrespectful analogies, defaming my ancestors and reviling my forebears? Seeking favour from the sovereign in this manner is a crime that cannot be pardoned.”
Lin replied:
“King Wen was a great sage, and the Duke of Zhou a great worthy; in revering ancestors and performing funeral rites with caution, even August Heaven could not match their devotion. When filial piety and fraternal affection reach their utmost, they communicate with the spiritual luminaries. Although there was the ancestral Zhou, in righteousness they did not contend for seniority. Why so? August Heaven has no favourites; ultimately it only aids virtue. The ancients were partial to principle, not to kin; they did not start from what preceded them, nor from what succeeded them. Though a relative commits a crime, they must be punished; though an unrelated person has merit, they must be rewarded. When rewards and punishments are principled and just, the realm is at peace.
Laozi cultivated instructions and made the Dao the ancestral source; his teaching of virtue extended to the common people; he showed tolerance toward others, kept his light humble, and his benevolent breeze served as a model for the four seas. Furthermore, he said: ‘My teacher is named the Buddha; the Buddha is one who awakens all people. The ancient sovereign of Tianzhu ascended to the west and departed.’ If one examines the teachings of Laozi, their beginning and end can be traced. In the Scripture Handed Down by the Sun, he instructed his disciples, saying: ‘My teacher has entered well into nirvāṇa, ceaselessly and constantly enduring; I now depart.’ Nowadays, what is expounded by Liu and Li slanders and destroys the master of Master Lao, yet the world cannot recognize it. I composed this Bianzheng lun (Treatise on Discerning the Correct) in eight fascicles, summarily answering the Daoists in over sixty items, all citing the prior words of the historical records; it was truly not meant to slander the imperial family.”
Thereafter he debated more than twenty items, and a memorial was fully submitted according to Lin’s statements. An imperial decree stated:
“In the chapter ‘Mutual Retribution of Faith and Slander’ of your Bianzheng lun, it says: ‘One who is mindful of Avalokiteśvara will not be harmed when facing the blade.’ We now grant you a reprieve of seven days to let yourself be mindful [of him], and shall test whether you can remain unharmed when the execution arrives.”
Lin was fettered in bonds without and pressed by the date of execution within. Tormented by fire and water in his heart, he had no way to appeal upwards. He therefore brought to mind the scriptures and teachings he had heard in his lifetime and the sacred names of the Three Sages, inscribing and reciting them in the chamber of his heart, aiming for a manifest response. When the time limit expired, suddenly his mental thoughts surged with swift boldness and overflowed in his breast. Joy and celebration followed one another; he abruptly forgot the fear of death, standing and waiting to be questioned. Before long the decree arrived, stating:
“Now the reprieve has ended and the execution is at hand. What have you been mindful of? Has your mindfulness had efficacy?”
Lin took up his brush and replied:
“Since the turmoil of the late Sui, the four seas have seethed. Calamity and poison spread abroad; shields and spears arose in contention. Armies were mobilized to attack one another, each presuming military might. Ministers were flattery-ridden and sovereigns profligate, failing to govern correctly; they severed the royal roads and obstinately held their own corners. Since the August Sovereign waged righteous punitive campaigns, he has cleansed the lands and seas; this was truly the power of Avalokiteśvara, and all relied on the grace of Mahāsthāmaprāpta. Matching virtues and following in their footsteps, your Way equals the highest sages; you save people from untimely death in the imperial court, and spare them from excessive punishments in the metropolis. During the past seven days, I have not been mindful of Avalokiteśvara; I have only been mindful of Your Majesty.”
An imperial decree directed the Attendant Censor of the Department of Justice Wei Cong to question Lin:
“There was an imperial edict ordering you to be mindful of Avalokiteśvara. Why were you not mindful of him, but instead say you were only mindful of His Majesty?”
Lin replied:
“I humbly understand that Avalokiteśvara’s holy discernment manifests worldly forms throughout the six destinies; above the heavens and below the earth, he is a model teacher to all. Now the Great Tang illuminates the four seas, and the nine barbarian tribes submit to their duties; punishments are clear across the eight quarters, the sovereign is sage and ministers are worthy, without committing injustice. Today Your Majesty nurtures the ordinary beings as children, which according to the scriptures is indeed Avalokiteśvara. Since the spiritual discernment corresponds, I was therefore only mindful of Your Majesty. Furthermore, the Bianzheng lun I composed is of the same category as the historical records; if a single phrase is erroneous, I submit to the axe. If Your Majesty accords with loyalty and righteousness, Lin will not lose a single hair; if Your Majesty metes out punishments recklessly to the innocent, Lin will suffer the grief of a fallen corpse.”
The matter was reported in full, and in the end no punishment was inflicted. There was an imperial edict exiling him to a Buddhist monastery in Yizhou. When he reached Bodhi Temple at Bailao Pass, he died of illness, aged sixty-nine. The śramaṇa Huixu took care of his suffering; their bond of feeling was as sharp as severing gold. Morning and night sharing a blanket, he comforted and attended to him. When Lin’s life was about to end, his head rested on Xu’s lap. Xu wept bitterly in grief, his tears falling like driving rain. He then summoned the clergy and laity from beside the pass and buried him on the summit of the eastern mountain, erecting a tall white stūpa and carving an inscription to commemorate him. Wayfarers who looked upon it and knew of him shed tears. The poetic works, rhapsodies, petitions, eulogies, steles, memorials, compositions, and dirges of the Mahāyāna teaching, together with various treatises, records, and biographies composed by Lin, total more than thirty fascicles. All strike a resonance like metal and stone; rich brocade adorns his literary imagination, which is flowing, elegant, facile, blazing, and deeply tranquil. Furthermore, he was skilled at preaching according to the occasion, improvising his words on the spot; his language matched musical tones and his meanings conformed with profound texts. Qin Shiying was eventually executed for wicked madness; both the public and officials wondered why his death had come so late. Liu, Li, and Fu successively passed away in turn. Thus Lin’s surviving writings and past conduct may serve as an axle-pin for ten thousand generations.
Da boreboluomiduo jing (Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra), six hundred fascicles (found in the Fan jing tu; preached by the Buddha in four locations across sixteen assemblies; translated starting on the first day of the first month of the fifth year of Xianqing at Yuhuadian in Yuhuagong Temple, and completed on the twentieth day of the tenth month of the third year of Longshuo; śramaṇas Dacheng Guang, Dacheng Qin, Jiashang, and others took down the text by brush).
Nengduan jingang boreboluomiduo jing (Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra), one fascicle (found in the Nei dian lu; the fourth translation, the same text as that translated by Kumārajīva of the Yao Qin and others; translated on the first day of the tenth month of the twenty-second year of Zhenguan at Hongfatai in Yuhua Palace, Yijun County, Fangzhou; Du Xingyi, Collator in the Secretariat, took down the text by brush).
Boreboluomiduo xin jing (Prajñāpāramitā-hṛdaya-sūtra), one fascicle (found in the Nei dian lu; the second translation, the same text as the Mohe bore damingzhou jing and others; translated on the twenty-fourth day of the fifth month of the twenty-third year of Zhenguan at Cuiwei Palace on Mount Zhongnan; śramaṇa Zhiren took down the text by brush).
Da pusa zang jing (Mahā-bodhisattvapiṭaka-sūtra), twenty fascicles (found in the Nei dian lu; now compiled into the Ratnakūṭa as the twelfth assembly; translated starting on the second day of the fifth month of the nineteenth year of Zhenguan in the Translation Hall of Hongfu Temple in the Western Capital, and completed on the second day of the ninth month; śramaṇa Zhizheng took down the text by brush, Daoxuan certified the text).
Da cheng da ji dizang shi lun jing (Mahāyāna Mahāsaṃnipāta Kṣitigarbha-daśacakra-sūtra), ten fascicles (found in the Nei dian lu; the thirteenth division of the Mahāsaṃnipāta, identical to the old Fangguang shi lun...
8.6.4
本永徽二年正月二十三日於西京大慈恩寺翻經院譯至六月二十九日畢沙門大乘光等筆受)
顯無邊佛土功德經一卷(見內典錄是華嚴經壽量品異譯永徽五年九月二
十八日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘雲筆受)
說無垢稱經六卷(見內典錄第七譯與羅什維摩經等同本永徽元年二月八日於大慈恩
寺翻經院譯至八月一日畢沙門大乘光筆受)
解深密經五卷(見內典錄全本第二譯與深密解脫解節相續解脫等並同本貞觀二十
一年五月十八日於弘福寺譯至七月十三日畢沙門大乘光筆受)
分別緣起初勝法門經二卷(見內典錄第二出與隋笈多緣生經同本永徽
元年二月三日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯至八日畢沙門大乘詢筆受)
藥師瑠璃光如來本願功德經一卷(見內典錄第二出與隋
笈多等出者同本永徽元年五月五日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門慧立筆受)
稱讚淨土佛攝受經一卷(見內典錄第三出與羅什阿彌陀經等同本永徽元
年正月一日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
甚希有經一卷(見內典錄第三出與未曾有經等同本貞觀二十三年五月十八日於終南
山翠微宮譯沙門大乘欽筆受)
最無比經一卷(見內典錄第二出與隋譯希有校量功德經同本貞觀二十三年七月十九日
於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
稱讚大乘功德經一卷(見內典錄初出與決定業障經同本永徽五年六月五日
於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
如來示教勝軍王經一卷(見內典錄第二出與諫王經等同本貞觀二十三年
二月六日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
緣起聖道經一卷(見內典錄第六出與貝多樹下經等同本貞觀二十三年正月一日於西
京北闕內紫微殿右弘法院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
不空羂索神呪心經一卷(見內典錄第二出與隋崛多等出者同本顯慶四年
四月十九日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
十一面神呪心經一卷(見內典錄第二出與周耶舍崛多等出者同本顯慶元年
三月二十八日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門玄則筆受)
呪五首經一卷(見翻經圖麟德元年正月一日於玉華寺玉華殿譯沙門大乘光筆受)
勝幢臂印陀羅尼經一卷(見內典錄初出與妙臂印幢陀羅尼同本永徽五年
九月二十九日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘雲筆受)
諸佛心陀羅尼經一卷(見內典錄永徽元年九月二十六日於大慈恩寺翻經院
譯沙門大乘雲筆受)
拔濟苦難陀羅尼經一卷(見內典錄永徽五年九月十日於大慈恩寺翻經院
譯沙門大乘光筆受)
八名普密陀羅尼經一卷(見內典錄永徽五年九月二十七日於大慈恩寺翻
經院譯沙門大乘雲筆受)
持世陀羅尼經一卷(見內典錄永徽五年十月十日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門神察
筆受)
六門陀羅尼經一卷(見內典錄貞觀十九年七月十四日於弘福寺翻經院譯沙門辯機
筆受)
佛地經一卷(見內典錄貞觀十九年七月十五日於弘福寺翻經院譯沙門辯機筆受)
受持七佛名號所生功德經一卷(見內典錄永徽二年正月九日
於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
佛臨涅槃記法住經一卷(見翻經圖永徽三年四月四日於大慈恩寺翻經
院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
寂照神變三摩地經一卷(見翻經圖龍朔三年十二月二十九日於玉華寺玉
華殿譯沙門大乘光筆受)
菩薩戒本一卷(見內典錄第三譯出瑜伽論本地分中菩薩地與曇無讖等出者同本貞觀二
十三年七月二十一日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯大乘光筆受)
菩薩戒羯磨文一卷(見內典錄出瑜伽論本地分中菩薩地貞觀二十三年七月十五日
於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
佛地經論七卷(見內典錄親光等菩薩造貞觀二十三年十月三日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯至
十一月二十四日畢沙門大乘光筆受)
瑜伽師地論一百卷(見內典錄彌勒菩薩說貞觀二十年五月十五日於弘福寺翻經院
譯至二十二年五月十五日畢沙門靈會朗𤀹等筆受)
顯揚聖教論二十卷(見內典錄無著菩薩造貞觀十九年十月一日於弘福寺翻經院譯
[This] text began translation on the twenty-third day of the first month in the second year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple in the Western Capital, and was completed on the twenty-ninth day of the sixth month; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang and others recorded it.)
Sūtra on the Merits of the Manifestation of Boundless Buddha Lands, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; a different translation of the "Life Span Chapter" of the Avataṃsaka-sūtra; translated on the twenty-eighth day of the ninth month in the fifth year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Yun recorded it).
Vimalakīrtinirdeśa-sūtra (Shuo wugoucheng jing), six fascicles (recorded in the Neidian lu; the seventh translation, of the same original as Kumārajīva's Vimalakīrti-sūtra, etc.; began translation on the eighth day of the second month in the first year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple, and was completed on the first day of the eighth month; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, five fascicles (recorded in the Neidian lu; the second translation of the complete text, of the same original as the Shenmi jietuo, Jie jie xiangxu jietuo, etc.; began translation on the eighteenth day of the fifth month in the twenty-first year of Zhenguan at Hongfu Temple, and was completed on the thirteenth day of the seventh month; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Sūtra on the Initial and Superior Dharma-Gate of Distinguishing Dependent Origination, two fascicles (recorded in the Neidian lu; the second translation, of the same original as the Yuansheng jing translated by [Jñāna]gupta under the Sui; began translation on the third day of the second month in the first year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple, and was completed on the eighth day; śramaṇa Dacheng Xun recorded it).
Sūtra on the Fundamental Vows and Merits of the Tathāgata Bhaiṣajyaguruvaiḍūryaprabha, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; the second translation, of the same original as that produced by [Dharma]gupta and others under the Sui; translated on the fifth day of the fifth month in the first year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Huili recorded it).
Sūtra in Praise of the Pure Land and the Protection of the Buddhas, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; the third translation, of the same original as Kumārajīva's Amitābha-sūtra, etc.; translated on the first day of the first month in the first year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Extremely Rare Sūtra (Shen xiyou jing), one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; the third translation, of the same original as the Weicengyou jing, etc.; translated on the eighteenth day of the fifth month in the twenty-third year of Zhenguan at Cuiwei Palace on Mount Zhongnan; śramaṇa Dacheng Qin recorded it).
Most Incomparable Sūtra (Zui wubi jing), one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; the second translation, of the same original as the Xiyou jiaoliang gongde jing translated under the Sui; translated on the nineteenth day of the seventh month in the twenty-third year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Sūtra in Praise of the Merits of the Mahāyāna, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; first translation, of the same original as the Jueding yezhang jing; translated on the fifth day of the sixth month in the fifth year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Sūtra on the Tathāgata's Instructions to King Jitasena (Prasenajit), one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; the second translation, of the same original as the Jianwang jing, etc.; translated on the sixth day of the second month in the twenty-third year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Sūtra on the Noble Path of Dependent Origination, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; the sixth translation, of the same original as the Beiduoshu xia jing, etc.; translated on the first day of the first month in the twenty-third year of Zhenguan at the Hongfa Court to the right of Ziwei Hall inside the Northern Palace Gate of the Western Capital; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Heart-Dhāraṇī of Amoghapāśa Sūtra, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; the second translation, of the same original as that produced by [Jñāna]gupta and others under the Sui; translated on the nineteenth day of the fourth month in the fourth year of Xianqing in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Eleven-Faced [Avalokiteśvara] Heart-Dhāraṇī Sūtra, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; the second translation, of the same original as that produced by Yaśogupta and others under the Northern Zhou; translated on the twenty-eighth day of the third month in the first year of Xianqing in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Xuanze recorded it).
Sūtra of the Five Incantations, one fascicle (recorded in the Fanjing tu; translated on the first day of the first month in the first year of Linde at Yuhua Hall in Yuhua Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Dhāraṇī Sūtra of the Banner-Peak Arm-Seal, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; first translation, of the same original as the Miaobi yin zhuang tuoluoni; translated on the twenty-ninth day of the ninth month in the fifth year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Yun recorded it).
Dhāraṇī Sūtra of the Mind of All Buddhas, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; translated on the twenty-sixth day of the ninth month in the first year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Yun recorded it).
Dhāraṇī Sūtra for Delivering and Relieving Suffering and Distress, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; translated on the tenth day of the ninth month in the fifth year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Eight-Names Universal-Secret Dhāraṇī Sūtra, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; translated on the twenty-seventh day of the ninth month in the fifth year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Yun recorded it).
Vasudhārā-dhāraṇī Sūtra (Chishi tuoluoni jing), one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; translated on the tenth day of the tenth month in the fifth year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Shencha recorded it).
Six-Gates Dhāraṇī Sūtra, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; translated on the fourteenth day of the seventh month in the nineteenth year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple; śramaṇa Bianji recorded it).
Buddhabhūmi-sūtra (Fodi jing), one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; translated on the fifteenth day of the seventh month in the nineteenth year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple; śramaṇa Bianji recorded it).
Sūtra on the Merits Produced by Upholding the Names of the Seven Buddhas, one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; translated on the ninth day of the first month in the second year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Sūtra on the Duration of the Dharma Prophesied by the Buddha at His Impending Nirvāṇa, one fascicle (recorded in the Fanjing tu; translated on the fourth day of the fourth month in the third year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Sūtra of the Samādhi of Silent Illumination and Supernatural Transformations, one fascicle (recorded in the Fanjing tu; translated on the twenty-ninth day of the twelfth month in the third year of Longshuo at Yuhua Hall in Yuhua Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Bodhisattva-prātimokṣa (Pusa jie ben), one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; the third translation, extracted from the Bodhisattvabhūmi in the Maulībhūmi portion of the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra; of the same original as that produced by Dharmakṣema and others; translated on the twenty-first day of the seventh month in the twenty-third year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Ritual Text for the Bodhisattva Precepts (Pusa jie jiemo wen), one fascicle (recorded in the Neidian lu; extracted from the Bodhisattvabhūmi in the Maulībhūmi portion of the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra; translated on the fifteenth day of the seventh month in the twenty-third year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Commentary on the Buddhabhūmi-sūtra (Fodi jing lun), seven fascicles (recorded in the Neidian lu; composed by Bodhisattva Bandhuprabha and others; began translation on the third day of the tenth month in the twenty-third year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Dacien Temple, and was completed on the twenty-fourth day of the eleventh month; śramaṇa Dacheng Guang recorded it).
Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra, one hundred fascicles (recorded in the Neidian lu; spoken by the Bodhisattva Maitreya; began translation on the fifteenth day of the fifth month in the twentieth year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple, and was completed on the fifteenth day of the fifth month in the twenty-second year; śramaṇa Linghui, Langzhen, and others recorded it).
Prakaraṇāryavācā-śāstra (Xianyang shengjiao lun), twenty fascicles (recorded in the Neidian lu; composed by the Bodhisattva Asaṅga; translated on the first day of the tenth month in the nineteenth year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple
8.6.5
至二十年正月十五日畢沙門智證等筆受)
瑜伽師地論釋一卷(見翻經圖最勝子等菩薩造永徽元年二月一日於大慈恩寺翻
經院譯沙門大乘暉筆受)
顯揚聖教論頌一卷(見內典錄無著菩薩造貞觀十九年六月十日於弘福寺翻經院譯
沙門辯機筆受)
王法正理論一卷(見內典錄彌勒菩薩造貞觀二十三年七月十八日於大慈恩寺翻經院
譯沙門大乘林筆受)
大乘阿毘達磨集論七卷(見內典錄無著菩薩造永徽三年正月十六日於大
慈恩寺翻經院譯至三月二十八日畢沙門大乘光大乘雲等筆受)
大乘阿毘達磨雜集論十六卷(見內典錄安慧菩薩糅貞觀二十年
正月十七日於弘福寺翻經院譯至𨳝三月二十九日畢沙門玄賾等筆受)
廣百論本一卷(見內典錄聖天菩薩造永徽元年六月十日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘
諶筆受)
大乘廣百論釋論十卷(見內典錄護法菩薩釋永徽元年六月二十七日於大慈
恩寺翻經院譯至十二月二十三日畢沙門敬明等筆受)
攝大乘論本三卷(見內典錄無著菩薩造第三出貞觀二十二年𨳝十二月二十六日於北
闕紫微殿西弘法院譯至二十三年六月十七日慈恩寺畢大乘巍筆受)
攝大乘論世親釋十卷(見內典錄第三出與陳真諦隋笈多出者同本貞觀二十
二年十二月八日於北闕弘法院譯至二十三年六月十七日慈恩寺畢大乘巍等筆受)
攝大乘論無性釋十卷(見內典錄貞觀二十一年三月一日於弘福寺翻經院譯
至二十三年六月十七日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯畢沙門大乘巍大乘林等筆受)
辯中邊論頌一卷(見內典錄彌勒菩薩造龍朔元年五月一日於玉華寺嘉壽殿譯沙
門大乘基筆受)
辯中邊論三卷(見內典錄世親菩薩造第二出與中邊分別論同本龍朔元年五月十日
於玉華寺嘉壽殿譯至三十日畢沙門大乘基筆受)
大乘成業論一卷(見內典錄世親菩薩造第二出與業成就論同本永徽二年𨳝九月五日
於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門大乘光筆受)
因明正理門論本一卷(見內典錄大域龍菩薩造初出與義淨出者同本貞觀二
十三年十二月二十五日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯沙門知仁筆受)
因明入正理論一卷(見內典錄商羯羅主菩薩造貞觀二十一年八月六日於弘福寺翻
經院譯沙門知仁筆受)
唯識二十論一卷(見翻經圖世親菩薩造第三出與元魏智希陳真諦出者同本龍朔元年
六月一日於玉華寺慶福殿譯沙門大乘基筆受)
唯識三十論一卷(見內典錄世親菩薩造貞觀二十二年五月二十九日於弘福寺翻經院
譯沙門大乘光筆受)
成唯識論十卷(見內典錄護法等菩薩造顯慶四年閏十月於玉華寺雲光殿譯沙門大乘基
筆受)
大乘掌珍論二卷(見內典錄清辯菩薩造貞觀二十三年九月八日於大慈恩寺翻經
院譯至十三日畢沙門大乘暉筆受)
大乘五蘊論一卷(見內典錄世親菩薩造第二出與五陰論同本貞觀二十一年二月二十
四日於弘福寺翻經院譯沙門大乘光等筆受)
觀所緣緣論一卷(見內典錄陳那菩薩造第二出與無相思塵論同本顯慶二年十二月二
十九日於東都大內麗日殿譯沙門大乘光筆受)
大乘百法明門論一卷(見內典錄世親菩薩造貞觀二十二年十一月十七日於
北闕弘法院譯沙門玄忠筆受)
緣起經一卷(見翻經圖出增一阿含第四十六卷異譯龍朔元年七月九日於玉華寺八桂亭譯沙
門神晈筆受)
本事經七卷(見內典錄永徽元年九月十日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯至十一月八日畢沙門靜邁
神昉等筆受)
天請問經一卷(見內典錄貞觀二十二年三月二十日於弘福寺翻經院譯沙門辯機筆受)
阿毘達磨發智論二十卷(見內典錄迦多衍尼子造第二出與舊八揵度論同
本顯慶二年正月二十六日於西京大內順賢閣譯至五年五月七日於玉華寺畢沙門玄則等筆受)
阿毘達磨法蘊足論十二卷(見內典錄大採菽氏造顯慶四年七月二十
七日於大慈恩寺翻經院譯至九月十四日畢沙門大乘光等筆受)
阿毘達磨集異門足論二十卷(見內典錄舍利子說顯慶五年十一
… completed on the fifteenth day of the first month of the twentieth year [of Zhenguan]; the śramaṇa Zhizheng and others recorded the text.)
*Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra-vyākhyā*, one fascicle (Found in the *Fanjing tu*; composed by Bodhisattva Jinaputra and others; translated on the first day of the second month of the first year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple; the śramaṇa Dachenghui recorded the text.)
*Prakaraṇāryavācā-śāstra-kārikā*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Asaṅga; translated on the tenth day of the sixth month of the nineteenth year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple; the śramaṇa Bianji recorded the text.)
*Rājadharma-nyāya-śāstra*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Maitreya; translated on the eighteenth day of the seventh month of the twenty-third year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple; the śramaṇa Dachenglin recorded the text.)
*Mahāyānābhidharma-samuccaya*, seven fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Asaṅga; translated beginning on the sixteenth day of the first month of the third year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple, completed on the twenty-eighth day of the third month; the śramaṇas Dachengguang, Dachengyun, and others recorded the text.)
*Mahāyānābhidharma-samuccaya-vyākhyā*, sixteen fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; compiled by Bodhisattva Sthiramati; translated beginning on the seventeenth day of the first month of the twentieth year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple, completed on the twenty-ninth day of the intercalary third month; the śramaṇa Xuanze and others recorded the text.)
*Śata-śāstra-vaipulya-mūla*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Āryadeva; translated on the tenth day of the sixth month of the first year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple; the śramaṇa Dachengshen recorded the text.)
*Mahāyāna-śata-śāstra-vaipulya-vyākhyā*, ten fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; commentary by Bodhisattva Dharmapāla; translated beginning on the twenty-seventh day of the sixth month of the first year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple, completed on the twenty-third day of the twelfth month; the śramaṇa Jingming and others recorded the text.)
*Mahāyānasaṃgraha-mūla*, three fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Asaṅga; third translation; translated beginning on the twenty-sixth day of the intercalary twelfth month of the twenty-second year of Zhenguan at the Hongfayuan to the west of the Ziwei Hall in the Northern Palace, completed on the seventeenth day of the sixth month of the twenty-third year at Ci'en Temple; Dachengwei recorded the text.)
*Vasubandhu's Commentary on the Mahāyānasaṃgraha*, ten fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; third translation, belonging to the same original text as those produced by Paramārtha under the Chen and Dharmagupta under the Sui; translated beginning on the eighth day of the twelfth month of the twenty-second year of Zhenguan at the Hongfayuan of the Northern Palace, completed on the seventeenth day of the sixth month of the twenty-third year at Ci'en Temple; Dachengwei and others recorded the text.)
*Asabhāva's Commentary on the Mahāyānasaṃgraha*, ten fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; translated beginning on the first day of the third month of the twenty-first year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple, completed on the seventeenth day of the sixth month of the twenty-third year in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple; the śramaṇas Dachengwei, Dachenglin, and others recorded the text.)
*Madhyāntavibhāga-kārikā*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Maitreya; translated on the first day of the fifth month of the first year of Longshuo at the Jiashou Hall of Yuhua Temple; the śramaṇa Dachengji recorded the text.)
*Madhyāntavibhāga-śāstra*, three fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Vasubandhu; second translation, belonging to the same original text as the *Zhongbian fenbie lun*; translated beginning on the tenth day of the fifth month of the first year of Longshuo at the Jiashou Hall of Yuhua Temple, completed on the thirtieth day; the śramaṇa Dachengji recorded the text.)
*Mahāyāna-karmasiddhiprakaraṇa*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Vasubandhu; second translation, belonging to the same original text as the *Ye chengjiu lun*; translated on the fifth day of the intercalary ninth month of the second year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple; the śramaṇa Dachengguang recorded the text.)
*Nyāyamukha-mūla*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Dignāga; first translation, belonging to the same original text as that produced by Yijing; translated on the twenty-fifth day of the twelfth month of the twenty-third year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple; the śramaṇa Zhiren recorded the text.)
*Nyāyapraveśa-śāstra*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Śaṅkarasvāmin; translated on the sixth day of the eighth month of the twenty-first year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple; the śramaṇa Zhiren recorded the text.)
*Viṃśikā-vijñaptimātratāsiddhi*, one fascicle (Found in the *Fanjing tu*; composed by Bodhisattva Vasubandhu; third translation, belonging to the same original text as those produced by Zhixi under the Northern Wei and Paramārtha under the Chen; translated on the first day of the sixth month of the first year of Longshuo at the Qingfu Hall of Yuhua Temple; the śramaṇa Dachengji recorded the text.)
*Triṃśikā-vijñaptimātratāsiddhi*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Vasubandhu; translated on the twenty-ninth day of the fifth month of the twenty-second year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple; the śramaṇa Dachengguang recorded the text.)
*Cheng weishi lun* (*Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi-śāstra*), ten fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Dharmapāla and others; translated in the intercalary tenth month of the fourth year of Xianqing at the Yunguang Hall of Yuhua Temple; the śramaṇa Dachengji recorded the text.)
*Karatala-ratna*, two fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Bhaviveka; translated beginning on the eighth day of the ninth month of the twenty-third year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple, completed on the thirteenth day; the śramaṇa Dachenghui recorded the text.)
*Pañcaskandhaka-śāstra*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Vasubandhu; second translation, belonging to the same original text as the *Wuyin lun*; translated on the twenty-fourth day of the second month of the twenty-first year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple; the śramaṇa Dachengguang and others recorded the text.)
*Ālambana-parīkṣā*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Dignāga; second translation, belonging to the same original text as the *Wuxiang sichen lun*; translated on the twenty-ninth day of the twelfth month of the second year of Xianqing at the Liri Hall of the Eastern Capital's Imperial Palace; the śramaṇa Dachengguang recorded the text.)
*Mahāyāna-śatadharma-prakāśamukha-śāstra*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Bodhisattva Vasubandhu; translated on the seventeenth day of the eleventh month of the twenty-second year of Zhenguan at the Hongfayuan of the Northern Palace; the śramaṇa Xuanzhong recorded the text.)
*Pratītyasamutpāda-sūtra*, one fascicle (Found in the *Fanjing tu*; an alternate translation of a passage from fascicle 46 of the *Ekottarika-āgama*; translated on the ninth day of the seventh month of the first year of Longshuo at the Bagui Pavilion of Yuhua Temple; the śramaṇa Shenjiao recorded the text.)
*Itivṛttaka-sūtra*, seven fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; translated beginning on the tenth day of the ninth month of the first year of Yonghui in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple, completed on the eighth day of the eleventh month; the śramaṇas Jingmai, Shenfang, and others recorded the text.)
*Devatā-paripṛcchā-sūtra*, one fascicle (Found in the *Neidian lu*; translated on the twentieth day of the third month of the twenty-second year of Zhenguan in the Translation Cloister of Hongfu Temple; the śramaṇa Bianji recorded the text.)
*Abhidharma-jñānaprasthāna-śāstra*, twenty fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Kātyāyanīputra; second translation, belonging to the same original text as the earlier *Bajiandu lun*; translated beginning on the twenty-sixth day of the first month of the second year of Xianqing at the Shunxian Pavilion of the Western Capital's Imperial Palace, completed on the seventh day of the fifth month of the fifth year at Yuhua Temple; the śramaṇa Xuanze and others recorded the text.)
*Abhidharma-dharmaskandha-pāda-śāstra*, twelve fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; composed by Mahāmaudgalyāyana; translated beginning on the twenty-seventh day of the seventh month of the fourth year of Xianqing in the Translation Cloister of Daci'en Temple, completed on the fourteenth day of the ninth month; the śramaṇa Dachengguang and others recorded the text.)
*Abhidharma-saṅgītiparyāya-pāda-śāstra*, twenty fascicles (Found in the *Neidian lu*; spoken by Śāriputra; in the eleventh [month] of the fifth year of Xianqing…
First 5 of 13 passages. Read on
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation