貞元新定釋教目錄 25.11

25.11

僧祇戒本一卷
　曹魏天竺沙門曇柯迦羅譯　第一譯
右前後兩譯一本在藏一本闕。
十誦比丘戒本一卷（或云十大比丘戒）
　符秦西域沙門曇摩持共佛念譯　第一譯
十誦比丘戒本一卷
　東晉西域沙門竺曇無蘭合出第二譯（右長房錄
云太元六年曇無勝闌合僧純曇摩持竺僧舒三家本以為一卷見寶唱錄謹案群錄僧純拘夷國得十誦尼戒梵
本將來令曇摩持等譯出准此純與曇摩同是一本其竺僧舒群錄無名不知合本從何而得未詳所以）
右兼合本前後三譯。一存二闕。
比丘尼戒一卷（或云比丘尼戒經出十誦律）
　西晉三藏竺法護譯　第一譯
比丘尼大戒一卷（亦云十誦比丘尼戒）
　符秦西域沙門曇摩持共佛念等譯　第二譯
十誦比丘尼所出本末一卷
　姚秦涼州沙門竺佛念譯　第三譯
（右長房錄云僧純於拘夷國得梵本佛念為譯文煩後竺法汰刪改正之見寶唱錄今疑佛念譯者與曇摩持同是
尼戒所出何異而別存之）。
前後三譯其本並闕。
彌沙塞羯磨一卷（出彌沙塞律）
　宋罽賓三藏佛陀什等譯（單本）
彌沙塞律抄一卷（亦名提阿波檀那眷屬自卑膩經）
　師子國沙門僧伽跋彌譯（不知年代寶唱錄出）單本附宋
迦葉禁戒經一卷（一名摩訶比丘經名真偽沙門經）
右前後兩譯一存一闕。
雜問律事二卷
　東晉西域沙門曇摩譯　第一譯
雜問律事二卷
　東晉罽賓沙門卑摩羅叉譯　第二譯
右二雜事同本異譯。其本並闕。
（靜秦錄云。後秦曇摩蜱譯十誦律雜事問二卷。寶唱錄云後秦罽賓沙門曇摩耶舍譯十誦律雜事一卷。此之二說
多是錄家人名差誤。或即是前第一譯者。長房內典二錄並云東晉所翻非秦代譯。依此二錄為正。房錄又云曇摩
譯者明佛法僧物互相交涉分齊差殊甚要須善除防護。今藏中有五百問事經一卷。有三十三紙亦明佛法僧物
不得參涉事。然名目不同。莫知所以。餘錄云。出十誦律者即五百問經中明三十九夜受日等事。即與十誦扶同。但
以名目有殊。未為剋定。後諸博見。詳而正之）。
教受比丘尼法一卷
　東晉罽賓三藏瞿曇僧伽提婆譯　單本
教授比丘尼二歲壇文一卷（或無尼字）
　符秦西域沙門曇摩持共佛念譯　單本
二百六戒三部合異二卷（序加大比丘字）
　東晉西域沙門竺曇無蘭譯
（右合戒序云。晉太元六年辛巳六月二十五日。比丘竺曇無蘭在謝鎮西寺合此戒到七月十八日記之。又長房內
典二錄及靖邁經圖之中並云。漢明帝時沙門竺法蘭譯二百六十戒合異二卷。今詳此說。理定不然。當佛法初興
戒律未備。戒之合異從何而來。今愚見所裁。只是竺曇無蘭所合之者。二人名姓俱同。錄家誤上曇無即法。還是法
蘭。故高僧傳法蘭所譯但標餘部無此戒名。今此錄中廢之不立。其曇無所合非是正翻。此錄之中亦不合載。但以
二說差誤。故存而記之）。
他毘利律一卷（齊言宿德律）
　蕭齊西域三藏摩訶乘譯　單本
僧澁多律一卷（陳言物攝）
　陳天竺三藏真諦譯　單本
遺教法律經三卷（或云遺教法律三昧亦云遺教三昧二卷）
　西晉沙門釋法炬譯　單本
六齋八戒經一卷
　宋天竺三藏求那跋陀羅譯　單本
賢者律儀經一卷（亦云威儀）
　宋居士沮渠京聲譯　單本
僧名數事行一卷（後漢失譯）
比丘諸禁律一卷（後漢失譯）
摩訶僧祇律比丘要集一卷（一名摩訶僧祇部比丘隨用集法）（後漢
失譯）
沙彌十戒經一卷（舊云沙彌戒）（後漢失譯）
比丘尼十戒經一卷（後漢失譯）
優婆塞威儀經一卷（後漢失譯）
大戒經一卷（魏吳失譯）
衣服制經一卷（魏吳失譯）
沙彌離威儀一卷（魏吳失譯）
道本五戒經一卷（魏吳失譯）
威儀經一卷（魏吳失譯）
應行律一卷
　僧祐錄云安公失譯經附西晉錄
五部威儀所服經一卷（或云五部僧服經）
　高僧傳云。白法祖譯。僧祐錄中失譯經。今
附宋錄
結界文經一卷
　僧祐錄中失譯經　今附宋錄
沙彌離戒一卷
　僧祐錄中失譯經　今附宋錄
五戒報應經一卷
　僧祐錄中失譯經　今附宋錄
根本說一切有部毘奈耶藥事二十卷
　貞元新入目錄　二帙　二百九十二紙
根本說一切有部毘奈耶破僧事二十卷
　貞元新入目錄　二帙　三百二十九紙
根本說一切有部毘奈耶出家事五卷
　貞元新入目錄　八十紙
根本說一切有部毘奈耶安居事一卷
貞元新入目錄　二十六紙
根本說一切有部毘奈耶隨意事一卷
貞元新入目錄　十二紙
根本說一切有部毘奈耶皮革事二卷
貞元新入目錄　二十五紙
根本說一切有部毘奈耶羯恥那衣事一卷
從出家事下五部十卷同帙。又從藥事下
七部五十卷拾遺補　貞元新入目錄。
右七部五十卷。大唐三藏義淨從大周證
聖元年至大唐景雲二年譯畢。准長安四
年十二月十四日勅及景雲二年閏六月二
十六日勅編入經目。今開元釋教錄中無。
今欲拾遺補闕編入貞元新定釋教目錄。
為訪本未足且附此闕本錄。

Sengqi jieben (Mahāsāṃghika Prātimokṣa), 1 fascicle.
Translated by the Indian śramaṇa Dharmakāla under the Cao Wei. First translation.
The above work has had two translations; one is extant in the canon, and one is missing.
Shisong biqiu jieben (Sarvāstivāda Bhikṣu Prātimokṣa), 1 fascicle (also called Shisong da biqiu jie).
Translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara together with Fonian under the Fu Qin. First translation.
Shisong biqiu jieben, 1 fascicle.
Compiled and produced by the Western Regions śramaṇa Zhu Tanwulan under the Eastern Jin. Second translation. (The above: Changfang's catalogue states that in the sixth year of Taiyuan, Tanwulan combined the three texts of Sengchun, Dharmadhara, and Zhu Sengshu into one fascicle; see Baochang's catalogue. We respectfully note that according to the various catalogues, Sengchun obtained the Indic text of the Sarvāstivāda bhikṣuṇī precepts in Kuqa and brought it back, instructing Dharmadhara and others to translate it. According to this, Sengchun's and Dharmadhara's were one and the same text. As for Zhu Sengshu, his name is absent from the various catalogues, and it is unknown where the compiled text came from, so the reason remains unclear.)
The above work, including the compiled text, has had three translations in all: one is extant and two are missing.
Biqiuni jie (Bhikṣuṇī Precepts), 1 fascicle (also called Biqiuni jie jing, extracted from the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya).
Translated by the Tripiṭaka master Zhu Fahu under the Western Jin. First translation.
Biqiuni dajie (Bhikṣuṇī Full Precepts), 1 fascicle (also called Shisong biqiuni jie).
Translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara together with Fonian and others under the Fu Qin. Second translation.
Shisong biqiuni suochu benmo (Origins and Developments of the Sarvāstivāda Bhikṣuṇī Precepts), 1 fascicle.
Translated by the Liangzhou śramaṇa Zhu Fonian under the Yao Qin. Third translation.
(The above: Changfang's catalogue states that Sengchun obtained the Indic text in Kuqa, and Fonian translated it for him. Because its style was prolix, Zhu Fatai later abridged and corrected it; see Baochang's catalogue. We now suspect that the one translated by Fonian is the same as the bhikṣuṇī precepts translated by Dharmadhara; in what way did what was produced differ that it should be preserved separately?)
All texts of the above three translations are missing.
Mishasai jiemo (Mahīśāsaka Karmavācanā), 1 fascicle (extracted from the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya).
Translated by the Kashmīri Tripiṭaka master Buddhajīva and others under the Song. (Single translation.)
Mishasai lü chao (Extracts from the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya), 1 fascicle (also called Ti'apotanna juanshu zibeini jing).
Translated by the Siṃhala śramaṇa Saṅghavarman (date unknown; appears in Baochang's catalogue). Single translation, appended to the Song.
Jiaye jinjie jing (Kāśyapa Precept Sūtra), 1 fascicle (also called Mohe biqiu jing, or Zhenwei shamen jing).
The above work has had two translations; one is extant and one is missing.
Za wen lüshi (Miscellaneous Inquiries into Vinaya Matters), 2 fascicles.
Translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara under the Eastern Jin. First translation.
Za wen lüshi, 2 fascicles.
Translated by the Kashmīri śramaṇa Vimalākṣa under the Eastern Jin. Second translation.
The above two miscellaneous texts are different translations of the same text; both of their texts are missing.
(The Jing Qin Catalogue states: "Dharmapī of the Later Qin translated the Shisong lü zashi wen in two fascicles." Baochang's catalogue states: "The Kashmīri śramaṇa Dharmayaśas of the Later Qin translated the Shisong lü zashi in one fascicle." These two accounts are mostly errors in personal names made by cataloguers, or they may simply be the aforementioned first translator. Both Changfang's catalogue and the Neidian lu state that it was translated in the Eastern Jin, not the Qin dynasty. Following these two catalogues is correct. Changfang's catalogue also states: "The one translated by Dharmadhara clarifies the boundaries and distinctions when goods belonging to the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha are mutually involved, which is extremely important and must be properly guarded against." At present, there is in the canon a Wubai wen shi jing in one fascicle, consisting of thirty-three sheets, which also clarifies that goods belonging to the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha must not be intermingled. However, because their titles differ, the reason is unknown. Other catalogues state that what was extracted from the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya corresponds to the thirty-nine nights of receiving days and other matters clarified in the Wubai wen jing, which agrees with the Sarvāstivāda. Yet because the titles differ, no definitive determination has been made. Let later scholars of broad learning examine and correct this.)
Jiaoshou biqiuni fa (Method for Instructing Bhikṣuṇīs), 1 fascicle.
Translated by the Kashmīri Tripiṭaka master Gautama Saṅghadeva under the Eastern Jin. Single translation.
Jiaoshou biqiuni er sui tanwen (Platform Text for Instructing Bhikṣuṇīs for Two Years), 1 fascicle (sometimes without the character "ni").
Translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara together with Fonian under the Fu Qin. Single translation.
Erbailiu jie sanbu heyi (Harmonised Discrepancies of the Two Hundred and Six Precepts of the Three Schools), 2 fascicles (the preface adds the characters "da biqiu").
Compiled by the Western Regions śramaṇa Zhu Tanwulan under the Eastern Jin.
(The above preface to the combined precepts states: "On the twenty-fifth day of the sixth month, the xinsi year, the sixth year of Taiyuan of the Jin dynasty, the bhikṣu Zhu Tanwulan harmonised these precepts at the Zhenxi Monastery of Xie, completing the record on the eighteenth day of the seventh month." Moreover, both Changfang's catalogue and the Neidian lu, as well as Jingmai's Jingtu, state: "In the time of Emperor Ming of the Han, the śramaṇa Zhu Falan translated the Erbailiushi jie heyi in two fascicles." Examining this statement now, logically it is certainly not so. When the Buddha-Dharma was first flourishing, the vinaya precepts were not yet fully available; whence could harmonised discrepancies among precepts have come? According to my humble view, this is merely what was harmonised by Zhu Tanwulan. Both individuals shared the same clan name and personal element; cataloguers mistakenly took Tanwu to be Fa, making it Falan again. Thus in the Gaoseng zhuan, Falan's translations only list other texts and do not contain this title of precepts. In the present catalogue, it is abolished and not retained. What Tanwu harmonised was not an actual translation, so it also does not belong in this catalogue. It is preserved and recorded here merely because of the discrepancy between the two accounts.)
Tabili lü (Thera-vinaya), 1 fascicle (in Qi translation, Xiude lü [Elders' Vinaya]).
Translated by the Western Regions Tripiṭaka master Mahāyāna under the Xiao Qi. Single translation.
Sengsheduo lü (Saṃghasaṃvṛta(?)-vinaya), 1 fascicle (in Chen translation, Wushe [Containment of Possessions]).
Translated by the Indian Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha under the Chen. Single translation.
Yijiao falu jing (Sūtra of the Vinaya of the Bequeathed Teaching), 3 fascicles (also called Yijiao falu sanmei, or Yijiao sanmei in 2 fascicles).
Translated by the Western Jin śramaṇa Shi Faju. Single translation.
Liu zhai ba jie jing (Sūtra on the Six Fast Days and Eight Precepts), 1 fascicle.
Translated by the Indian Tripiṭaka master Guṇabhadra under the Song. Single translation.
Xianzhe lüyi jing (Sūtra on the Virtuous One's Vinaya Deportment), 1 fascicle (also called Weiyi).
Translated by the Song upāsaka Juqu Jingsheng. Single translation.
Seng mingshu shixing (Enumerated Practice of Matters of the Saṅgha), 1 fascicle (translator lost under the Later Han).
Biqiu zhu jinlü (Various Prohibitive Rules for Bhikṣus), 1 fascicle (translator lost under the Later Han).
Mohesengqi lü biqiu yaoji (Essential Collection for Bhikṣus from the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya), 1 fascicle (also called Mohesengqi bu biqiu suiyong jifa) (translator lost under the Later Han).
Shami shijie jing (Sūtra on the Ten Precepts of Śrāmaṇeras), 1 fascicle (formerly called Shami jie) (translator lost under the Later Han).
Biqiuni shijie jing (Sūtra on the Ten Precepts of Bhikṣuṇīs), 1 fascicle (translator lost under the Later Han).
Youpose weiyi jing (Sūtra on Upāsaka Deportment), 1 fascicle (translator lost under the Later Han).
Dajie jing (Full Precept Sūtra), 1 fascicle (translator lost under the Wei or Wu).
Yifu zhi jing (Sūtra on Regulations for Robes), 1 fascicle (translator lost under the Wei or Wu).
Shamilie weiyi (Śrāmaṇera Deportment), 1 fascicle (translator lost under the Wei or Wu).
Daoben wujie jing (Fundamental Precept Sūtra on the Five Precepts), 1 fascicle (translator lost under the Wei or Wu).
Weiyi jing (Sūtra on Deportment), 1 fascicle (translator lost under the Wei or Wu).
Yinghanglei (Proper Conduct Vinaya), 1 fascicle.
Sengyou's catalogue lists it as an anonymous translation from Dao'an's record, appended to the Western Jin catalogue.
Wubu weiyi suofu jing (Sūtra on the Robes Worn According to the Deportment of the Five Schools), 1 fascicle (also called Wubu sengfu jing).
The Gaoseng zhuan states that it was translated by Bo Fazu; it is an anonymous translation in Sengyou's catalogue, now appended to the Song catalogue.
Jiejiewen jing (Sūtra of the Text on Demarcating Boundaries), 1 fascicle.
Anonymous translation in Sengyou's catalogue, now appended to the Song catalogue.
Shamilie jie (Śrāmaṇera Precepts), 1 fascicle.
Anonymous translation in Sengyou's catalogue, now appended to the Song catalogue.
Wujie baoying jing (Sūtra on the Retribution for the Five Precepts), 1 fascicle.
Anonymous translation in Sengyou's catalogue, now appended to the Song catalogue.
Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya Bheṣajyavastu, 20 fascicles.
Newly entered into the Zhenyuan catalogue; 2 cases; 292 sheets.
Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya Saṃghabhedavastu, 20 fascicles.
Newly entered into the Zhenyuan catalogue; 2 cases; 329 sheets.
Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya Pravrajyāvastu, 5 fascicles.
Newly entered into the Zhenyuan catalogue; 80 sheets.
Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya Varṣāvastu, 1 fascicle.
Newly entered into the Zhenyuan catalogue; 26 sheets.
Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya Pravāraṇāvastu, 1 fascicle.
Newly entered into the Zhenyuan catalogue; 12 sheets.
Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya Carmavastu, 2 fascicles.
Newly entered into the Zhenyuan catalogue; 25 sheets.
Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya Kaṭhinavastu, 1 fascicle.
From the Pravrajyāvastu downward, the 5 works in 10 fascicles share a case. Furthermore, from the Bheṣajyavastu downward, the 7 works in 50 fascicles are supplements recovering omissions, newly entered into the Zhenyuan catalogue.
The above 7 works in 50 fascicles were translated by the Tripiṭaka master Yijing of the Great Tang from the first year of Zhengsheng of the Great Zhou to the second year of Jingyun of the Great Tang. According to the edicts of the fourteenth day of the twelfth month of the fourth year of Chang'an and the twenty-sixth day of the intercalary sixth month of the second year of Jingyun, they were catalogued into the scriptural indices. At present they are absent from the Kaiyuan Record of Buddhist Teachings. Wishing now to recover omissions and supply what is lacking, we enter them into the Zhenyuan Newly Revised Catalogue of Buddhist Teachings. Because searches for texts have not yet been completed, they are provisionally appended to this catalogue of missing texts.