貞元新定釋教目錄 26.7.4

26.7.4

Daguangming pusa bai sishiba yuan jing, 1 fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says it is an extract; newly entered above)
Pusa liu fa xing jing, 1 fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says it is an extract)
Pusa benyuan xing pin jing, 1 fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says it is an extract; newly entered above)
Pusa zhu kuxing jing, 1 fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says it is an extract; sometimes without the character zhu; a little over four sheets; newly entered above)
Pusa he shuimian jing, 1 fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says it is an extract; newly entered above)
Pusa he jia guo jing, 1 fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says it is an extract; newly entered above)
Anan jian shuiguang rui jing, 1 fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says it is an extract; newly entered above)
Qi'e zhangzhe wen pusa fa jing, 1 fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says it is an extract; newly entered above)
Tuoluoni ji jing, 1 fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says it is an extract; newly entered above)
Liu jing jing, 1 fascicle (Master Daoan says it comes from a vinaya sūtra; listed among anonymous translations; eight and a half sheets; newly entered above)
Pusa deng ru fayan jing, 1 fascicle (Sometimes without the word Pusa; listed in Daoan's catalogue under anonymous translations; newly entered above)
Tonghao fo ming jing, 1 fascicle (Three sheets; newly entered above)
Sanshi fa jing, 1 fascicle (Sometimes written with the character chi; two sheets; newly entered above)
The ten sūtras including the Sanshiqi pin: Sengyou's catalogue says they are extracts without specifying their source. Among them, regarding the Pusa zhu kuxing jing, on examining the manuscript it is unquestionably an extract, yet it is still unknown from which sūtra or vinaya it comes. Regarding the four sūtras including the Liu jing, now on seeing their manuscripts they are indeed extract sūtras as well. Furthermore, in the Renshou Catalogue of Various Sūtras of the Sui dynasty, there are in total 117 Mahāyāna extract sūtras in 137 fascicles that likewise do not specify their source. Now examining the catalogues of various dynasties, most have already been included. That catalogue takes texts such as the Hu zhu tongzi jing and the Tuolinni bo jing to be separate offshoot extracts, which is unreasonable. Since there is no certain basis, it is difficult to rely on them. They are briefly explained as above, and the rest have been excised and not recorded.