貞元新定釋教目錄 27.13

27.13

Bodhisattvabhūmi-dhāra-sūtra, ten fascicles (or eight fascicles; also titled Bodhisattva-śīla-sūtra, and also titled Bodhisattvabhūmi-sūtra).
The one scripture above is also titled Bodhisattvabhūmi-dhāra-śāstra. In the present catalogue, it is compiled as vinaya, retaining its scripture title and eliminating its entry as a treatise. In the catalogue, stating that the Bodhisattvabhūmi-dhāra-sūtra lacks an extant text is an error. Furthermore, in the Zhou catalogue, this single text, having multiple titles, was confused back and forth, entered redundantly in six places in all, which is a gross error.
(Entered in one place among Mahāyāna scriptures, two places among Mahāyāna vinayas, one place among Mahāyāna treatises, and two places in the catalogue of lacking texts).
Other redundant scriptures are not few in number; fearing to waste paper and ink, they are described only briefly.

Abhayadattā-sūtra, one fascicle (now compiled into the Ratnakūṭa-sūtra).
Paramārtha-dharma-vijaya-sūtra, one fascicle.
Maitreya-bodhisattva-paripṛcchā-pūrvapraṇidhāna-sūtra, one fascicle.
The three scriptures above were recorded in two places in the Great Zhou Canon Catalogue, under both single translations and retranslations, which is an error. The entries under single translations are now removed, and they are compiled among the retranslations.

Bodhicittoppāda-sūtra, two fascicles (also titled Bodhicittoppāda-śāstra).
The one scripture above was recorded in two places in the Zhou Canon Catalogue, among Mahāyāna scriptures and among Mahāyāna treatises, which is an error. Now, because it was composed by a bodhisattva, its scripture title is removed and it is retained in the treatise catalogue.

Jianwang jing, one fascicle (also titled Da xiao jianwang jing).
The one scripture above was recorded in both the canon and lacking-text catalogues in the Zhou [catalogue], which is an error.

Dharmapada, two fascicles (also titled Dharmapada Collection).
The one scripture above was recorded in two places in the Zhou Canon Catalogue, under Mahāyāna translations and within anthologies and biographies, which is an error. Upon examining the texts, they are identical and cannot be divided into two. Although it was retranslated in the past, one text is lacking. It is now removed from the scriptures and compiled within the anthologies.

Mahāyānasaṃgrahabhāṣya, twelve fascicles.
The one treatise above: the Kaihuang and Renshou second-year canonical catalogues of the Sui, as well as the Tang Neidian lu, the Great Zhou catalogue, and others, all preserve two texts, stating that it is an alternate translation from the same source text as the fifteen-fascicle Saṃgrahabhāṣya, and that both were translated by the Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha of the Chen dynasty, which is an error. Now, collating the phrasing from beginning to end, they are completely identical. Although there is a difference in the number of fascicles, it cannot be divided into two works. Only the fifteen-fascicle text is retained; the one made into twelve fascicles is eliminated.