金剛般若經旨贊 2.34

2.34

經。所以者何至即是非相　贊曰。此悟法空也。無我等者。何所以耶。以能依經悟法空故。由彼我執依法執生法執尚除我見。寧有諸相非相是法空故。

Sūtra: "Why is that?" up to "is precisely not a mark." Commentary: This is awakening to the emptiness of phenomena. Why are they without [the mark of] self and so forth? Because by relying on the sūtra they are able to awaken to the emptiness of phenomena. Since that grasping at a self arises dependent on the grasping at phenomena, when grasping at phenomena is already removed, how could a view of self remain? All marks being not marks is precisely the emptiness of phenomena.