金剛般若經依天親菩薩論贊略釋秦本義記卷上 1.65

1.65

經。須菩提於意云何如來得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提耶如來有所說法耶　自下斷第三疑也。此名化佛證說疑。論敘疑云。向說不可以身相成就得見如來。何以故如來非有為相得名故。若如是云何釋迦牟尼佛得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提說名為佛。云何為人說法。為斷此疑經文有二。一問答斷疑。二校量顯勝。前中有六。一問二答三徵四釋五重徵六重釋。此初問也。汝意可謂。化身如來所得菩提是真得耶說四諦法是真說耶。

[Sūtra:] "Subhūti, what do you think? Has the Tathāgata attained anuttarā samyaksambodhi? Does the Tathāgata have any Dharma that he has preached?" From here on resolves the third doubt. This is called the doubt concerning the nirmāṇakāya Buddha's realization and teaching. The treatise sets out the doubt, saying: "Earlier it was said that one cannot see the Tathāgata by the perfection of bodily marks. Why is this? Because the Tathāgata does not obtain his name by conditioned marks. If so, how did Śākyamuni Buddha attain anuttarā samyaksambodhi and come to be called 'Buddha'? How does he preach the Dharma for people?" To resolve this doubt, the sūtra text has two parts: 1. resolving the doubt through question and answer; 2. demonstrating superiority through comparison. The former has six parts: 1. question, 2. answer, 3. inquiry, 4. explanation, 5. re-inquiry, 6. re-explanation. This is the first, the question: "In your estimation, is the bodhi attained by the nirmāṇakāya Tathāgata a true attainment? Is the preaching of the four noble truths a true preaching?"