四部律并論要用抄 2.35

2.35

第三篇初畜長衣戒　三十尼薩耆波逸提并九十波逸提有一百二十戒。名第三篇。俱前之三十因財故犯須捨已如悔。下九十戒往成無可捨。以捨不捨無別故二處。問清淨同是三說。對手悔合為一篇　僧祇云。優波離問佛。齋幾許應作淨。幾許不作淨。佛言。廣一肘長二肘應淨　四分云。長衣廣如來四指八寸長如來八指尺六也。如是應作淨　十誦云。問曰。若衣經淨緯不淨。緯淨經不淨。經緯俱不淨。應捨應淨施不。佛言。不應淨施。云何名不淨。謂駱陀毛牛毛羝羊毛等。雜織者名不淨。又問。若比丘多有長衣。若火燒若腐爛。若斷壞若虫嚙。應捨不。佛言。不應捨。是比丘俱應如法滅罪　僧祇云。比丘共衣犯長不。答。不犯。若分竟不作淨者犯　問。何等人邊應作淨。佛言。於五眾邊作淨　又問。相去近遠得從作淨。佛言。齊三由旬知其存亡　又問。施主死。當云何。佛言。得停十日。於餘知識邊作淨。

The third class [of offenses]: The first precept on keeping extra robes.
Thirty niḥsargika-prāyaścittikas together with ninety prāyaścittikas make one hundred and twenty precepts, which are called the third class [of offenses]. For the former thirty, because they are committed on account of property, one must forfeit [the property] and then perform deśanā according to rule. For the ninety precepts below, as they are completed by action alone, there is nothing to forfeit. Because forfeiture and non-forfeiture differ, they are placed in two categories. Question: Since purification is likewise performed through threefold recitation and confession face-to-face, why are they combined into one class? The Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya states: Upāli asked the Buddha, “Of what size should [a piece of cloth] be made pure, and of what size need it not be made pure?” The Buddha said, “One cubit wide and two cubits long should be made pure.” The Caturvargika-vinaya states, “For an extra robe, if it is four fingers of the Tathāgata wide (eight [Chinese] inches) and eight fingers of the Tathāgata long (one [Chinese] foot six inches), in such cases it should be made pure.” The Daśādhyāya-vinaya states: Question: “If the warp of the cloth is pure and the weft is impure, or the weft is pure and the warp is impure, or both warp and weft are impure, should it be forfeited or made pure through transfer (vikappana)?” The Buddha said, “It should not be made pure through transfer.” “What is called impure?” “It refers to camel hair, ox hair, ram’s wool, and the like; woven together in mixture, it is called impure.” He also asked, “If a monk has many extra robes, and they are either burned by fire, rotted, severed and damaged, or gnawed by insects, should they be forfeited?” The Buddha said, “They should not be forfeited; this monk should simply clear the offense according to the Dharma.” The Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya states, “If monks share a robe, does it violate [the rule against] extra [robes]?” Answer: “It is no offense. If after dividing it they do not make it pure, it is an offense.” Question: “Before what kind of person should it be made pure?” The Buddha said, “It should be made pure before [a member of] the five assemblies.” Question again: “At what distance may one undergo the purification from them?” The Buddha said, “Up to three yojanas, knowing whether that person is alive or dead.” Question again: “If the donor dies, what should be done?” The Buddha said, “One may keep it for ten days and make it pure before another spiritual friend.”