瑜伽師地論分門記 1.243

1.243

四釋斷下分結等三種要義頌分三。一標經句分三。一問。二答。三結。二釋經文。三明略義　二釋經文分二。一釋問詞。二釋答詞。初文分二。一明請主。二釋問詞。二釋答詞分二　一明答初問詞分二。一釋下分結分二。一明依身輕安。二依心善解脫。二釋上分結分三。一依無作。二依繫念。三依不動　二釋答第二問詞分二。一明因分二。一依了法。二依修習無尋定。二明果分三。一憤。二愛三惽沈過解脫　第三明略義分二。一總標。二解釋分二異門　初門分二。一明問意分二。一標。二釋分三如論。二明答意分二。一標。二釋分五。一答五下分分結斷非方便。二答上分結斷方便非斷。三答斷方便分四。一標。二列名。三釋。四結。四答善斷分三。一標。二列名。三釋分三如論。五總結　第二異門分二。一明問意。二釋腰舟分四。一明正義。二引經。三明未得。四釋腰舟名分二。一問。二答。

Fourth, the explanation of the verses on the three essential points such as severing the lower fetters has three parts: 1. Indicating the sūtra phrases, which has three parts: question, answer, and conclusion; 2. Explaining the sūtra text; 3. Clarifying the summary meaning. 2. Explaining the sūtra text has two parts: 1. Explaining the phrasing of the question; 2. Explaining the phrasing of the answer. The first text has two parts: 1. Clarifying the petitioner; 2. Explaining the phrasing of the question. 2. Explaining the phrasing of the answer has two parts: i. Clarifying the answer to the first phrasing of the question, which has two parts: a. Explaining the lower fetters, which has two parts: clarifying relying on physical pliancy (praśrabdhi), and relying on the mind's good liberation; b. Explaining the upper fetters, which has three parts: relying on inactivity, relying on binding mindfulness, and relying on being unshakeable; ii. Clarifying the answer to the second phrasing of the question, which has two parts: a. Clarifying the causes, which has two parts: relying on comprehending phenomena, and relying on cultivating concentration without directed thought; b. Clarifying the fruit, which has three parts: liberation from the faults of resentment, affection, and torpor. 3. Clarifying the summary meaning has two parts: 1. General indication; 2. Explanation, which has two alternative approaches. The first approach has two parts: 1. Clarifying the intention of the question, which has two parts: indication, and explanation having three parts as in the treatise; 2. Clarifying the intention of the answer, which has two parts: indication, and explanation having five parts: i. Answering that severing the five lower fetters is not the means; ii. Answering that the means to severing the upper fetters is not yet severance; iii. Answering the means to severance, which has four parts: indication, listing the names, explanation, and conclusion; iv. Answering proper severance, which has three parts: indication, listing the names, and explanation having three parts as in the treatise; v. General conclusion. The second alternative approach has two parts: 1. Clarifying the intention of the question; 2. Explaining the waist-boat, which has four parts: i. Clarifying the correct meaning; ii. Citing sūtras; iii. Clarifying not yet having attained; iv. Explaining the name "waist-boat," which has two parts: question and answer.