瑜伽師地論分門記 2.148

2.148

初文分三。一總問。二廣答。三總結　廣答分六　一明於不淨尋思其義分三。一立因。二顯果。三結　二明於不淨尋思其事分三。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分二。一標。二釋。三結　三明於不淨尋思其相分二。一尋思自相分二。一問。二答分二。一尋思內不淨自相分三。一依內明自相。二依二界明內自相分二。一標。二釋。三結。二尋思外不淨自相分九如論。三尋思共相分三。一問。二答分三。一立所緣分二。一內。二外。二立能緣分二。一自觀。二觀他。三立喻。三結　四明尋思不淨品分三。一問。二答分三。一明尋思黑品分四。一立因。二顯果。三明現法過。四明後法過。二明尋思白品分四。一立因。二顯果。三明現法利。四明後法利。三明悟清勝利分二。一明斷黑品勝利。二明修白品勝利。三結　五明尋思不淨時分三。一問。二答分四。一尋思現在不淨時分二。一內。二外。二尋思過去不淨時。三尋思未來不淨時。四總觀。三結　六明尋思彼不淨理分二。一總問。二廣答分四。一依觀待道理明尋思不淨分三。一依二諦明觀待道理分二。一依勝義明觀不淨。二依世俗諦明觀不淨分三。一立正義。二引證。三釋經意。二依根本觀不淨分二。一依因明不淨。二依緣明不淨。三明總結。二依作用道理尋思不淨分三。一立因。二顯果。三結。三依證成道理尋思不淨分四。一依聖言量觀不淨分三。一立因。二顯果。三結。二依現量觀不淨分三。一立因。二顯果。三結。三依比量觀不淨分二。一標。二釋。四明總結。四依法爾道理尋思不淨分三。一標。二釋。三結　第三總結。

The first text has three parts: 1. general question; 2. detailed answer; 3. general summary. / The detailed answer has six parts: / 1. explaining the examination of its meaning with regard to the foul, with three parts: (1) positing the cause, (2) revealing the result, (3) summary; / 2. explaining the examination of its thing with regard to the foul, with three parts: (1) question, (2) answer, with two parts: a. positing the cause, b. revealing the result, with two parts: (a) statement, (b) explanation, (3) summary; / 3. explaining the examination of its characteristics with regard to the foul, with two parts: (1) examining particular characteristics, with two parts: a. question, b. answer, with two parts: (a) examining internal particular characteristics of the foul, with three parts: i. explaining particular characteristics based on the internal, ii. explaining internal particular characteristics based on the two realms, with two parts: [i] statement, [ii] explanation, iii. summary; (b) examining external particular characteristics of the foul, with nine parts as in the treatise; (2) examining common characteristics, with three parts: a. question, b. answer, with three parts: (a) positing the objective support, with two parts: i. internal, ii. external; (b) positing the cognitive agent, with two parts: i. contemplating oneself, ii. contemplating others; (c) positing a metaphor; c. summary; / 4. explaining the examination of the categories of the foul, with three parts: (1) question, (2) answer, with three parts: a. explaining the examination of the black category, with four parts: (a) positing the cause, (b) revealing the result, (c) explaining faults in the present life, (d) explaining faults in future lives; b. explaining the examination of the white category, with four parts: (a) positing the cause, (b) revealing the result, (c) explaining benefits in the present life, (d) explaining benefits in future lives; c. explaining the excellent benefits of realizing purity, with two parts: (a) explaining the benefits of abandoning the black category, (b) explaining the benefits of cultivating the white category; (3) summary; / 5. explaining the examination of the time of the foul, with three parts: (1) question, (2) answer, with four parts: a. examining the time of the present foul, with two parts: (a) internal, (b) external; b. examining the time of the past foul; c. examining the time of the future foul; d. comprehensive contemplation; (3) summary; / 6. explaining the examination of the principle of that foul, with two parts: (1) general question, (2) detailed answer, with four parts: a. explaining the examination of the foul in terms of the principle of dependence, with three parts: (a) explaining the principle of dependence based on the two truths, with two parts: i. contemplating the foul based on the ultimate truth, ii. contemplating the foul based on the conventional truth, with three parts: [i] positing the correct meaning, [ii] citing scriptural proof, [iii] explaining the intent of the sūtra; (b) contemplating the foul based on the root, with two parts: i. explaining the foul based on causes, ii. explaining the foul based on conditions; (c) general summary; b. examining the foul in terms of the principle of efficacy, with three parts: (a) positing the cause, (b) revealing the result, (c) summary; c. examining the foul in terms of the principle of demonstration, with four parts: (a) contemplating the foul based on trustworthy scripture, with three parts: i. positing the cause, ii. revealing the result, iii. summary; (b) contemplating the foul based on direct perception, with three parts: i. positing the cause, ii. revealing the result, iii. summary; (c) contemplating the foul based on inference, with two parts: i. statement, ii. explanation; (d) general summary; d. examining the foul in terms of the principle of dharmatā, with three parts: (a) statement, (b) explanation, (c) summary; / 3. general summary.