瑜伽師地論分門記 2.154

2.154

第三明不緩加行分三。一問。二答分三。一略釋。二廣釋分三。一依出定等六法明不緩加行。二依出家在家二眾明不緩加行。三依勇猛明不緩加行分三。一立正義。二徵。二答所以。三顯果分二。一立因。二顯果。三結　第四明無倒加行分三。一問。二答分四。一倒取義。二不住自見。三無僻執。四不輕尊教。三結　第五明應時加行分三。一總問二廣答。三總結　廣答分三。一總標分四如論。二列名分十二如論。二別釋分四　第一明止三相分三。一明止體分三。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分六如論。三結。二明止相分四。一總問。二略答。三列名。四別釋分二。一明所緣相分四。一標。二釋。三結。四明勝利。二明因緣相分三。一標。二釋分二。一立所修。二立能修。三結。三止時分二。一問。二答分三。一依止品。二依觀品。三依事業明時　第二明觀三相分三。一明觀體分二。一問。二答分三如論。二明觀相分四。一總問。二略答。三列名。四別釋分二。一明所緣相分三　一標。二釋。三明勝利。二明因緣相分二。一標。二釋分二。一立所修。二立能修。三明觀時分二。一問。二答分三。一依沈時。二依恐沈時。三依止品所緣境明時　第三明舉三相分三。一明舉體分二。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分三如論。二明舉相分二。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分二如論。三明舉時分二。一問。二答分二如論　第四明捨三相分三。一明捨體分二。一問。二答分五如論。二明捨相分二。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分二如論。三明捨時分二。一問。二答分二。一立所治。二立能治　三總結　第六明解了加行分三。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分三如論。三結　第七明無厭足加行分三。一問。二答分三。一依善品。二依修道　三依求果明無厭足義。三結　第八明不捨軛加行分四。一問。二答分八如論。三釋名分五如論。四結　第九明正加行分五。一總問。二略答。三引喻分二。一立因。二顯果。四廣解。五總結　廣解分四。一總標。二列名分五如論。三別釋分五。一明內攝其心。二明不念作意。三明於經作意。四明對治作意。五明無相界作意四明意趣分二。一總標。二別釋分二。一明內攝其心意趣分二。一總標。二別釋分十如論。二明不念作意意趣分六。一總標。二徵問。三略答。四明不捨不取義。五明無亂等義。六明遍止觀等過失勝利義　第五總結　別釋中第二明九種黑品加行　第三總結。

Third, explaining unremitting application has three parts: 1. question; 2. answer has three parts: (1) brief explanation; (2) detailed explanation has three parts: i. explaining unremitting application based on the six dharmas such as emergence from meditative absorption; ii. explaining unremitting application based on the two assemblies of monastics and householders; iii. explaining unremitting application based on vigor has three parts: a. establishing the correct meaning; b. query; c. answering the reason; (3) revealing the result has two parts: i. establishing the cause; ii. revealing the result; 3. conclusion. Fourth, explaining non-erroneous application has three parts: 1. question; 2. answer has four parts: (1) erroneous apprehension of meaning; (2) not abiding in one's own view; (3) absence of perverse clinging; (4) not slighting the Venerable One's teaching; 3. conclusion. Fifth, explaining timely application has three parts: 1. general question; 2. detailed answer; 3. general conclusion. The detailed answer has three parts: 1. general designation has four parts, as in the treatise; 2. listing the names has twelve parts, as in the treatise; 3. separate explanations has four parts: First, explaining the three characteristics of calming (śamatha) has three parts: 1. explaining the essence of calming has three parts: (1) question; (2) answer has two parts: i. establishing the cause; ii. revealing the result has six parts, as in the treatise; (3) conclusion; 2. explaining the characteristics of calming has four parts: (1) general question; (2) brief answer; (3) listing the names; (4) separate explanations has two parts: i. explaining the characteristics of the focal object has four parts: a. designation; b. explanation; c. conclusion; d. explaining the benefits; ii. explaining the characteristics of causes and conditions has three parts: a. designation; b. explanation has two parts: (a) establishing what is cultivated; (b) establishing what cultivates; c. conclusion; 3. the time for calming has two parts: (1) question; (2) answer has three parts: i. based on the category of calming; ii. based on the category of contemplation; iii. explaining the time based on activity. Second, explaining the three characteristics of contemplation (vipaśyanā) has three parts: 1. explaining the essence of contemplation has two parts: (1) question; (2) answer has three parts, as in the treatise; 2. explaining the characteristics of contemplation has four parts: (1) general question; (2) brief answer; (3) listing the names; (4) separate explanations has two parts: i. explaining the characteristics of the focal object has three parts: a. designation; b. explanation; c. explaining the benefits; ii. explaining the characteristics of causes and conditions has two parts: a. designation; b. explanation has two parts: (a) establishing what is cultivated; (b) establishing what cultivates; 3. explaining the time for contemplation has two parts: (1) question; (2) answer has three parts: i. based on the time of laxity; ii. based on the time when laxity is feared; iii. explaining the time based on the focal domain of the category of calming. Third, explaining the three characteristics of uplifting (pragrahākāra) has three parts: 1. explaining the essence of uplifting has two parts: (1) question; (2) answer has two parts: i. establishing the cause; ii. revealing the result has three parts, as in the treatise; 2. explaining the characteristics of uplifting has two parts: (1) question; (2) answer has two parts: i. establishing the cause; ii. revealing the result has two parts, as in the treatise; 3. explaining the time for uplifting has two parts: (1) question; (2) answer has two parts, as in the treatise. Fourth, explaining the three characteristics of equanimity (upekṣākāra) has three parts: 1. explaining the essence of equanimity has two parts: (1) question; (2) answer has two parts, as in the treatise; 2. explaining the characteristics of equanimity has two parts: (1) question; (2) answer has two parts: i. establishing the cause; ii. revealing the result has two parts, as in the treatise; 3. explaining the time for equanimity has two parts: (1) question; (2) answer has two parts: i. establishing what is to be eliminated; ii. establishing the antidote; 3. general conclusion. Sixth, explaining clear comprehension application has three parts: 1. question; 2. answer has two parts: (1) establishing the cause; (2) revealing the result has three parts, as in the treatise; 3. conclusion. Seventh, explaining insatiable application has three parts: 1. question; 2. answer has three parts: (1) based on the bright category; (2) based on the path of cultivation; (3) explaining the meaning of insatiability based on seeking the result; 3. conclusion. Eighth, explaining unyielding application has four parts: 1. question; 2. answer has eight parts, as in the treatise; 3. explaining the terms has five parts, as in the treatise; 4. conclusion. Ninth, explaining correct application has five parts: 1. general question; 2. brief answer; 3. adducing metaphors has two parts: (1) establishing the cause; (2) revealing the result; 4. detailed explanation; 5. general conclusion. The detailed explanation has four parts: 1. general designation; 2. listing the names has five parts, as in the treatise; 3. separate explanations has five parts: (1) explaining gathering the mind internally; (2) explaining non-conceptual attention (amanasikāra); (3) explaining attention toward the sūtras; (4) explaining antidotal attention; (5) explaining attention to the signless realm; 4. explaining the underlying intent has two parts: (1) general designation; (2) separate explanations has two parts: i. explaining the intent of gathering the mind internally has two parts: a. general designation; b. separate explanations has ten parts, as in the treatise; ii. explaining the intent of non-conceptual attention has six parts: a. general designation; b. query; c. brief answer; d. explaining the meaning of not relinquishing and not grasping; e. explaining the meaning of non-distraction, etc.; f. explaining the faults and benefits of calming and contemplation everywhere; 5. general conclusion. Under separate explanations, second, explaining the nine kinds of application of the dark category; third, general conclusion.