瑜伽師地論分門記 6.172

6.172

分三十中第二十三明諸蘊三性義分二異門　初門依感果等義明三性義分三。一明諸蘊善性分二。一總問分二如論。二廣答分二。一答善性分二如論。二答其數。二明諸不善性分二。一總問分二如論。二廣分二。一答不善自性分二如論。二答其數。三明諸蘊無記性分二。一總問分二如論。二廣答分二。一答無記自性。二答其數　第二異門依離過失等義明三性義分二。一總標。二別釋分三。一明諸蘊善性分二如論。二明諸蘊不善性。三明諸蘊無記性。

Within the thirty divisions, the twenty-third, explaining the meaning of the three natures regarding the skandhas, has two different approaches. The first approach, based on the meaning of producing results and so forth, explains the meaning of the three natures in three parts: 1. explaining the wholesome nature of the skandhas, having two parts: (1) a general inquiry, having two parts as in the treatise, (2) a detailed answer, having two parts: a. answering [regarding] the wholesome nature, having two parts as in the treatise, b. answering [regarding] their number; 2. explaining the unwholesome natures, having two parts: (1) a general inquiry, having two parts as in the treatise, (2) a detailed [answer], having two parts: a. answering [regarding] the unwholesome svabhāva, having two parts as in the treatise, b. answering [regarding] their number; 3. explaining the indeterminate nature of the skandhas, having two parts: (1) a general inquiry, having two parts as in the treatise, (2) a detailed answer, having two parts: a. answering [regarding] the indeterminate svabhāva, b. answering [regarding] their number. The second approach, based on the meaning of being free from faults and so forth, explains the meaning of the three natures in two parts: 1. a general presentation; 2. an individual explanation, having three parts: (1) explaining the wholesome nature of the skandhas, having two parts as in the treatise, (2) explaining the unwholesome nature of the skandhas, (3) explaining the indeterminate nature of the skandhas.