瑜伽師地論分門記 6.231

6.231

初門分六。一總問。二略答分二。一標。二釋。三徵問。四列名分四如論。五明立門意趣分二。一問。二答。六別釋分四　一明成辨門差別相分六。一總問。二立生起。三略釋。四列名分三如論。五別釋分三。一明諸根越所作義分二。一總標。二別釋分二。一依眼根明處非處義分二。一明非處義。二明是處義。二例依餘根明處非處義。第二明大種越所作義分二。一總標。二別釋分二。一依地大明處非處義分二。一明非處義。二明是處義。二例依餘大明處非處義。第三明資生越所作義分二。一總標。二別釋分五。一依種子明處非處義分二如論。二依牛角等明處非處義分二如論。三依水瓶等明處非處義分二如論。四沙等明處非處義分二如論。五依濕木等明處非處義分二如論。第六明總結　第二合會門差別相分三。一總問。二廣答分六。一依明闇明處非處相分二如論。二依麁分水火明處非處相分二如論。三依麁色聚明處非處相分二如論。四依同一種類二心心法明處非處相分二如論。五依善不善等法明處非處相分二如論。六依愛非愛果明處非處相分二如論。第三明總結　第三明證得門差別相分三。一總問。二廣答分七。一依石女明處非處相分二如論。二依半擇迦明處非處相分二如論。三依盲等明處非處相分二如論。四依未具資糧明處非處相分二如論。五依聖道明處非處相分二如論。六依人趣等飲食明處非處相分二如論。七依不捨那落迦身等明處非處相分二如論。第三總結　第四明現行門差別相分三。一總問。二廣答分十一。一依地界自相作餘界相明處非處相分二如論。二依水等餘界明處非處相。三依不得天眼明處非處相分二如論。四依不得天耳等明處非處相。五依有貪愛等明處非處相。六依瞋等明處非處相。七依不斷煩惱明處非處相分二如論。八依餘菩提分法明處非處相。九依不捨諍見等明處非處相分二如論。十依一切智見明處非處相分二如論。十一依已入大地明處非處相分二如論。第三明總結。

The first approach has six parts: 1. general question; 2. brief answer, with two subparts: (1) statement, (2) explanation; 3. query; 4. listing names, with four divisions as in the treatise; 5. explaining the intent of establishing the approaches, with two subparts: (1) question, (2) answer; 6. separate explanations, with four subparts.
1. Explaining the distinct aspects of the approach of accomplishment, having six divisions: (1) general question; (2) establishing the emergence; (3) brief explanation; (4) listing names, with three divisions as in the treatise; (5) separate explanations, with three subparts: [i] explaining that the faculties do not transcend their functions, with two divisions: general statement, and separate explanation, which has two subparts: explaining sthānāsthāna based on the eye faculty (having two subparts: explaining what is an impossible case, and explaining what is a possible case), and by analogy explaining sthānāsthāna based on the other faculties; [ii] explaining that the great elements do not transcend their functions, with two divisions: general statement, and separate explanation, which has two subparts: explaining sthānāsthāna based on the earth element (having two subparts: explaining what is an impossible case, and explaining what is a possible case), and by analogy explaining sthānāsthāna based on the other elements; [iii] explaining that requisites for living do not transcend their functions, with two divisions: general statement, and separate explanation, which has five subparts: explaining sthānāsthāna based on seeds (with two subparts as in the treatise), explaining sthānāsthāna based on cow horns and the like (with two subparts as in the treatise), explaining sthānāsthāna based on water jars and the like (with two subparts as in the treatise), explaining sthānāsthāna based on sand and the like (with two subparts as in the treatise), and explaining sthānāsthāna based on wet wood and the like (with two subparts as in the treatise); (6) general conclusion.
2. The distinct aspects of the approach of conjunction, having three divisions: (1) general question; (2) extensive answer, with six subparts: explaining sthānāsthāna based on light and darkness (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on coarse divisions of water and fire (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on coarse aggregations of matter (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on two minds or mental factors of the same kind (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on wholesome and unwholesome phenomena and so forth (with two subparts as in the treatise); and explaining sthānāsthāna based on agreeable and disagreeable fruits (with two subparts as in the treatise); (3) general conclusion.
3. Explaining the distinct aspects of the approach of realization, having three divisions: (1) general question; (2) extensive answer, with seven subparts: explaining sthānāsthāna based on a barren woman (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on a paṇḍaka (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on the blind and so forth (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on not having completed the provisions (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on the noble path (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on the food and drink of the human realm and so forth (with two subparts as in the treatise); and explaining sthānāsthāna based on not discarding the body of a naraka-being and so forth (with two subparts as in the treatise); (3) general conclusion.
4. Explaining the distinct aspects of the approach of active operation, having three divisions: (1) general question; (2) extensive answer, with eleven subparts: explaining sthānāsthāna based on the earth element's own characteristic producing the characteristics of other elements (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on water and the other remaining elements; explaining sthānāsthāna based on not attaining the divine eye (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on not attaining the divine ear and so forth; explaining sthānāsthāna based on having attachment and craving and so forth; explaining sthānāsthāna based on hatred and so forth; explaining sthānāsthāna based on not having severed afflictions (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on the other factors of awakening; explaining sthānāsthāna based on not discarding disputatious views and so forth (with two subparts as in the treatise); explaining sthānāsthāna based on all-knowing vision (with two subparts as in the treatise); and explaining sthānāsthāna based on having entered the great ground (with two subparts as in the treatise); (3) general conclusion.