大乘入道次第開決 1.201

1.201

由能分別見道等者。問。既言分別見道所證。明知即是相見道收。何故前言於修道中而建立也。答。理實見修皆有二智。各自分別自所證理。而彼論中。依自他利增微義邊隱顯而說。謂於初地能利自地。於見道中初得自利。真見義增相見用微。但說真見隱相不論。於修道中所起利他。本智用微後智用增。隱正體智但說後得。故說修道所有正見分別見道自所證理。理實分別自修道中自正體智所證理也。

"Due to being able to conceptualize the path of seeing..." and so forth: Question: Since it says conceptualizing what is realized by the path of seeing, it clearly belongs to the path of seeing marks; why did the previous text say it is established in the path of cultivation? Answer: In truth, both seeing and cultivation have both wisdoms, each conceptualizing the principle realized by itself. But in that treatise, they are spoken of implicitly or explicitly according to the increase or decrease of self-benefit and benefiting others. That is, on the first bhūmi, one can benefit one's own bhūmi, and in the path of seeing, one first obtains self-benefit; the meaning of true seeing increases, while the function of seeing marks is slight, so only true seeing is mentioned while the marks are hidden and not discussed. In the benefiting of others that arises in the path of cultivation, the fundamental wisdom's function is slight, while the subsequent wisdom's function increases; hiding the fundamental wisdom, only the subsequently attained is mentioned. Therefore, it is said that the correct view of the path of cultivation conceptualizes the principle realized by the path of seeing itself. In truth, it conceptualizes the principle realized by one's own fundamental wisdom in one's own path of cultivation.