Viyahapannatti 18.1.724
Viyāhapannatti 18.1.724
- Language
- Ardhamāgadhī Prakrit
18.1.724
jīve ṇaṃ bhaṃte! jīvabhāveṇa kiṃ carime? acarime? goyamā! no carime, acarime|
neraie ṇaṃ bhaṃte! neraiyabhāveṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! siya carime, siya acarime| evaṃ jāva vemāṇie| siddhe jahā jīve|
jīvā ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! no carimā, acarimā|neraiyā carimā vi, acarimā vi|evaṃ jāva vemāṇiyā| siddhā jahā jīvā
āhārae savvattha egatteṇaṃ siya carime, siya acarime; puhatteṇaṃ carimā vi, acarimā vi| anāhārao jīvo siddho ya egatteṇa vi puhatteṇa vi no carimo, acarimo| sesaṭṭhāṇesu egatta-puhatteṇaṃ jahā āhārao|
bhavasiddhīo jīvapade egatta-puhatteṇaṃ carime, no acarime| sesaṭṭhāṇesu jahā āhārao| abhavasiddhīo savvattha egatta-puhatteṇaṃ no carime, acarime| nobhavasiddhīya-noabhavasiddhīyajīvā siddhā ya egatta-puhatteṇaṃ jahā abhavasiddhīo|
saṇṇī jahā āhārao, evaṃ asaṇṇī vi| nosaṇṇī-noasaṇṇī jīvapade siddhapade ya acarime, manussapade carime egatta-puhatteṇaṃ|
salesso jāva sukkalesso jahā āhārao, navaraṃ–jassa jā atthi| alesso jahā nosaṇṇī-noasaṇṇī|
sammadiṭṭhī jahā anāhārao| micchādiṭṭhī jahā āhārao| sammāmicchadiṭṭhī egiṃdiya-vigaliṃdiyavajjaṃ siya carime, siya acarime| puhatteṇaṃ carimā vi, acarimā vi|
saṃjamo jīvo manusso ya jahā āhārao| assaṃjao vi taheva| saṃjayāsaṃjae vi taheva, navaraṃ–jassa jaṃ atthi| nosaṃjaya-noasaṃjaya-nosaṃjayāsaṃjao jahā nobhavasiddhīya-noabhavasiddhīo|
sakasāyī jāva lobhakasāyī savvaṭṭhāṇesu jahā āhārao| akasāyī jīvapade siddhe ya no carime, acarime| manussapade siya carime, siya acarime|
nāṇī jahā sammaddiṭṭhī savvattha| ābhinibohiyanāṇī jāva manapajjavanāṇī jahā āhārao, navaraṃ–jassa jaṃ atthi| kevalanāṇī jahā nosaṇṇī-noasaṇṇī| annāṇī jāva vibhaṃganāṇī jahā āhārao|
sajogī jāva kāyajogī jahā āhārao, jassa jo jogo atthi| ajogī jahā nosaṇṇī-noasaṇṇī|
sāgārovautto anāgārovautto ya jahā anāhārao|
savedao jāva napuṃsagavedao jahā āhārao| avedao jahā akasāyī|
sasarīrī jāva kammagasarīrī jahā āhārao, navaraṃ–jassa jaṃ atthi| asarīrī jahā nobhavasiddhīya-noabhavasiddhīo
paṃcahiṃ pajjattīhiṃ paṃcahiṃ apajjattīhiṃ jahā āhārao, savvattha egatta-puhatteṇaṃ daṃḍagā bhāṇiyavvā| imā lakkhaṇagāhā
"Venerable Sir! Is a jīva, by state of being a jīva, final or non-final?"
"Gautama! Not final; it is non-final."
"Venerable Sir! Is an inhabitant of hell, by state of being an inhabitant of hell—" [the query is repeated.]
"Gautama! It may be final, it may be non-final. In this manner up to [celestial beings of] celestial abodes. Liberated souls are just like jīvas."
"Jīvas—" [the query is repeated.]
"Gautama! Not final; they are non-final. Inhabitants of hell are both final and non-final. In this manner up to [celestial beings of] celestial abodes. Liberated souls are just like jīvas.
An intake-taking [soul] everywhere in the singular may be final, may be non-final; in the plural, they are both final and non-final. A non-intake-taking jīva and a liberated soul, both in the singular and in the plural, are not final; they are non-final. In the remaining states, in the singular and in the plural, they are just like the intake-taking [soul].
A soul capable of liberation, under the category of jīva, in the singular and in the plural, is final, not non-final. In the remaining states, it is just like the intake-taking [soul]. A soul incapable of liberation everywhere, in the singular and in the plural, is not final; it is non-final. Jīvas neither-capable-of-liberation-nor-incapable-of-liberation and liberated souls, in the singular and in the plural, are just like the soul incapable of liberation.
A sentient [soul] is just like the intake-taking [soul]; likewise also a non-sentient [soul]. Neither-sentient-nor-non-sentient under the category of jīva and under the category of liberated souls is non-final; under the category of human beings, it is final, in the singular and in the plural.
With lesyā up to with white lesyā is just like the intake-taking [soul], with the distinction: whichever belongs to whichever. Devoid of lesyā is just like neither-sentient-nor-non-sentient.
Possessing right view is just like the non-intake-taking [soul]. Possessing wrong view is just like the intake-taking [soul]. Possessing mixed right-and-wrong view, excluding one-sensed and incomplete-sensed [beings], may be final, may be non-final; in the plural, they are both final and non-final.
A self-restrained jīva and human being are just like the intake-taking [soul]. The non-self-restrained is also just like that. The partially self-restrained is also just like that, with the distinction: whichever belongs to whichever. Neither-self-restrained-nor-non-self-restrained-nor-partially-self-restrained is just like neither-capable-of-liberation-nor-incapable-of-liberation.
With passions up to with greed passion in all states is just like the intake-taking [soul]. Passionless under the category of jīva and liberated soul is not final; it is non-final. Under the category of human beings, it may be final, it may be non-final.
With knowledge everywhere is just like possessing right view. With sensory knowledge up to with mind-reading knowledge is just like the intake-taking [soul], with the distinction: whichever belongs to whichever. With omniscient knowledge is just like neither-sentient-nor-non-sentient. With non-knowledge up to with erroneous clairvoyance is just like the intake-taking [soul].
With activity up to with body activity is just like the intake-taking [soul], whichever activity belongs to whichever. Devoid of activity is just like neither-sentient-nor-non-sentient.
Applied with determinate consciousness and applied with indeterminate consciousness are just like the non-intake-taking [soul].
With gender up to with neuter gender is just like the intake-taking [soul]. Devoid of gender is just like the passionless.
With body up to with karmic body is just like the intake-taking [soul], with the distinction: whichever belongs to whichever. Devoid of body is just like neither-capable-of-liberation-nor-incapable-of-liberation.
With the five developable completions and with the five non-developable completions, it is just like the intake-taking [soul]; the series should be stated everywhere in the singular and plural. This is the defining verse:
Translations (3)
- Viyāhapannatti: Hindi translation (Dīparatnasāgara, 2019) — Hindi
- Viyāhapannatti: Gujarati translation (Dīparatnasāgara, 2020) — Gujarati
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Commentaries (2)
- Viyāhapannatti: ṭīkānusārī vivecana — Muni Dīparatnasāgara 2000, Gujarati
- Bhagavatīvṛtti — Abhayadeva Sūri, Sanskrit