Viyahapannatti 18.10: Uddeśaka 10: somila
Viyāhapannatti 18.10
- Language
- Ardhamāgadhī Prakrit
Uddeśaka 10: somila
18.10.753
rāyagihe jāva evaṃ vayāsī–anagāre ṇaṃ bhaṃte! bhāviyappā asidhāraṃ vā khuradhāraṃ vā ogāhejjā?
haṃtā ogāhejjā|
se ṇaṃ tattha chijjejja vā bhijjejja vā?
no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe| no khalu tattha satthaṃ kamai|
anagāre ṇaṃ bhaṃte! bhāviyappā aganikāyassa majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?
haṃtā vīivaejjā|
se ṇaṃ bhaṃte! tattha jjhiyāejjā?
goyamā! no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe| no khalu tattha satthaṃ kamai|
anagāre ṇaṃ bhaṃte! bhāviyappā pukkhalasaṃvaṭṭagassa mahāmehassa majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?
haṃtā vīivaejjā|
se ṇaṃ bhaṃte! tattha ulle siyā?
goyamā! no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe| no khalu tattha satthaṃ kamai|
anagāre ṇaṃ bhaṃte! bhāviyappā gaṃgāe mahānadīe paḍisoyaṃ havvamāgacchejjā? haṃtā havvamāgacchejjā|
se ṇaṃ bhaṃte! tattha vinihāyamāvajjejjā?
goyamā! no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe| no khalu tattha satthaṃ kamai|
anagāre ṇaṃ bhaṃte! bhāviyappā udagāvattaṃ vā udagabiṃduṃ vā ogāhejjā?
haṃtā ogāhejjā|
se ṇaṃ bhaṃte! tattha pariyāvajjejjā?
goyamā! no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe| no khalu tattha satthaṃ kamai|
At Rājagṛha, and so on, he spoke thus:
"Venerable Sir! Could a cultivated ascetic step upon the edge of a sword or the edge of a razor?"
"Yes, he could step upon [it]."
"Would he be cut or split there?"
"This meaning is not valid. A weapon certainly cannot harm [him] there."
"Venerable Sir! Could a cultivated ascetic pass through the midst of a mass of fire?"
"Yes, he could pass through."
"Venerable Sir! Would he be burned there?"
"Gautama! This meaning is not valid. A weapon certainly cannot harm [him] there."
"Venerable Sir! Could a cultivated ascetic pass through the midst of a Puṣkarasaṃvartaka great cloud?"
"Yes, he could pass through."
"Venerable Sir! Would he become wet there?"
"Gautama! This meaning is not valid. A weapon certainly cannot harm [him] there."
"Venerable Sir! Could a cultivated ascetic swiftly go against the current of the great river Gaṅgā?"
"Yes, he could swiftly go."
"Venerable Sir! Would he meet with destruction there?"
"Gautama! This meaning is not valid. A weapon certainly cannot harm [him] there."
"Venerable Sir! Could a cultivated ascetic enter into a whirlpool or a drop of water?"
"Yes, he could enter."
"Venerable Sir! Would he suffer harm there?"
"Gautama! This meaning is not valid. A weapon certainly cannot harm [him] there."
18.10.754
paramāṇupoggale ṇaṃ bhaṃte! vāuyāeṇaṃ phuḍe? vāuyāe vā paramāṇupoggaleṇaṃ phuḍe?
goyamā! paramāṇupoggale vāuyāeṇaṃ phuḍe, no vāuyāe paramāṇupoggaleṇaṃ phuḍe|
duppaesie ṇaṃ bhaṃte! khaṃdhe vāuyāeṇaṃ phuḍe? vāuyāe vā duppaesieṇaṃ khaṃdheṇaṃ phuḍe? evaṃ ceva| evaṃ jāva asaṃkhejjapaesie|
anaṃtapaesie ṇaṃ bhaṃte! khaṃdhe vāuyāeṇaṃ phuḍe–pucchā|
goyamā! anaṃtapaesie khaṃdhe vāuyāeṇaṃ phuḍe, vāuyāe anaṃtapaesieṇaṃ khaṃdheṇaṃ siya phuḍe, siya no phuḍe|
vatthī bhaṃte! vāuyāeṇaṃ phuḍe? vāuyāe vā vatthiṇā phuḍe?
goyamā! vatthī vāuyāeṇaṃ phuḍe, no vāuyāe vatthiṇā phuḍe|
"Venerable Sir! Is an ultimate atom of pudgala touched by the air-body, or is the air-body touched by an ultimate atom of pudgala?"
"Gautama! An ultimate atom of pudgala is touched by the air-body, but the air-body is not touched by an ultimate atom of pudgala."
"Venerable Sir! Is a two-space-point aggregate touched by the air-body, or is the air-body touched by a two-space-point aggregate?" In the very same way. In this manner, up to an innumerable-space-point [aggregate].
"Venerable Sir! Is an infinite-space-point aggregate touched by the air-body?"—the question.
"Gautama! An infinite-space-point aggregate is touched by the air-body; the air-body may be touched by an infinite-space-point aggregate, and may not be touched."
"Venerable Sir! Is a leather bag touched by the air-body, or is the air-body touched by a leather bag?"
"Gautama! A leather bag is touched by the air-body, but the air-body is not touched by a leather bag."
18.10.755
atthi ṇaṃ bhaṃte! imīse rayaṇappabhāe puḍhavīe ahe davvāiṃ vaṇṇao kāla-nīla-lohiya-hālidda-sukkilāiṃ, gaṃdhao subbhigaṃdhāiṃ, dubbhigaṃdhāiṃ, rasao titta-kaḍuya-kasāya-aṃbila-mahurāiṃ, phāsao kakkhaḍa-mauya-garuya-lahuya-sīya-usiṇa-niddha-lukkhāiṃ, annamannabaddhāiṃ, annamannapuṭṭhāiṃ, annamanna-baddhapuṭṭhāiṃ, annamannaghaḍattāe ciṭṭhaṃti?
haṃtā atthi| evaṃ jāva ahesattamāe|
atthi ṇaṃ bhaṃte! sohammassa kappassa ahedavvāiṃ? evaṃ ceva| evaṃ jāva īsipabbhārāe puḍhavīe|
sevaṃ bhaṃte! sevaṃ bhaṃte! jāva viharai|
tae ṇaṃ samaṇe bhagavaṃ mahāvīre annayā kayāi rāyagihāo nagarāo guṇasilāo ceiyāo paḍinikkhamai, paḍinikkhamittā bahiyā janavayavihāraṃ viharai|
"Venerable Sir! Are there substances below this Ratnaprabhā earth that are in color black, blue, red, yellow, and white; in smell fragrant and foul-smelling; in taste bitter, pungent, astringent, sour, and sweet; in touch rough, soft, heavy, light, cold, hot, smooth, and dry; bound to one another, touched by one another, bound and touched to one another, existing in conjunction with one another?"
"Yes, there are." In this manner, up to the Seventh Below.
"Venerable Sir! Are there substances below the Saudharma kalpa?" In the very same way. In this manner, up to the Īṣatprāgbhārā earth.
"It is so, Venerable Sir! It is so, Venerable Sir!" [Gautama] up to dwelled.
Then the ascetic, Lord Mahāvīra, on another occasion, departed from the city of Rājagṛha, from the Guṇaśīla caitya, and having departed, dwelled wandering in the countryside outside.
18.10.756
teṇaṃ kāleṇaṃ teṇaṃ samaeṇaṃ vāṇiyagāme nāmaṃ nagare hotthā–vaṇṇao| dūtipalāsae ceie–vaṇṇao| tattha ṇaṃ vāṇiyagāme nagare somile nāmaṃ māhaṇe parivasati aḍḍhe jāva bahujaṇassa aparibhūe, rivveda jāva supariniṭṭhie, paṃcaṇhaṃ khaṃḍiyasayāṇaṃ, sayassa ya, kuḍuṃbassa āhevaccaṃ porevaccaṃ sāmittaṃ bhaṭṭittaṃ āṇā-īsara-senāvaccaṃ kāremāṇe pālemāṇe viharai| tae ṇaṃ samaṇe bhagavaṃ mahāvīre jāva samosaḍhe jāva parisā pajjuvāsati|
tae ṇaṃ tassa somilassa māhaṇassa imīse kahāe laddhaṭṭhassa samāṇassa ayameyārūve ajjhatthie ciṃtie patthie manogae saṃkappe samuppajjitthā–evaṃ khalu samaṇe nāyaputte puvvānupuvviṃ caramāṇe gāmānugāmaṃ dūijjamāṇe suhaṃsuheṇaṃ viharamāṇe ihamāgae ihasaṃpatte ihasamosaḍhe iheva vāṇiyagāme nagare dūtipalāsae ceie ahāpaḍirūvaṃ oggahaṃ ogiṇhittā saṃjameṇaṃ tavasā appāṇaṃ bhāvemāṇe viharai| taṃ gacchāmi ṇaṃ samaṇassa nāyaputtassa aṃtiyaṃ pāubbhavāmi, imāiṃ ca ṇaṃ eyārūvāiṃ aṭṭhāiṃ heūiṃ pasiṇāiṃ kāraṇāiṃ vāgaraṇāiṃ pucchissāmi, taṃ jai me se imāiṃ eyārūvāiṃ aṭṭhāiṃ jāva vāgaraṇāiṃ vāgarehiti tato ṇaṃ vaṃdīhāmi namaṃsīhāmi jāva pajjuvāsīhāmi, aha me se imāiṃ aṭṭhāiṃ jāva vāgaraṇāiṃ no vāgarehitī to ṇaṃ eehiṃ ceva aṭṭhehi ya jāva vāgaraṇehiṃ ya nippaṭṭha-pasiṇavāgaraṇaṃ karessāmi ti kaṭṭu evaṃ saṃpehei, saṃpehettā ṇhāe jāva appamahagghābharaṇālaṃkiyasarīre sāo gihāo paḍinikkhamati, paḍinikkhamittā pāyavihāracāreṇaṃ egeṇaṃ khaṃḍiyasaeṇaṃ saddhiṃ saṃparivuḍe vāṇiyagāmaṃ nagaraṃ majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ niggacchai, niggacchittā jeṇeva dūtipalāsae ceie, jeṇeva samaṇe bhagavaṃ mahāvīre teṇeva uvāgacchai, uvāgacchittā samaṇassa bhagavao mahāvīrassa adūrasāmaṃte ṭhiccā samaṇaṃ bhagavaṃ mahāvīraṃ evaṃ vayāsī–
jattā te bhaṃte? javaṇijjaṃ te bhaṃte? avvābāhaṃ te bhaṃte? phāsuyavihāraṃ te bhaṃte?
somilā! jattā vi me, javaṇijjaṃ pi me, avvābāhaṃ pi me, phāsuyavihāraṃ pi me|
kiṃ te bhaṃte! jattā?
somilā! jaṃ me tava-niyama-saṃjaya-sajjhāya-jjhāṇāvassagamādīesu jogesu jayaṇā, settaṃ jattā|
kiṃ te bhaṃte! javaṇijjaṃ?
somilā! javaṇijje duvihe pannatte, taṃ jahā–iṃdiyajavaṇijje ya, noiṃdiyajavaṇijje ya|
se kiṃ taṃ iṃdiyajavaṇijje?
iṃdiyajavaṇijje–jaṃ me soiṃdiya-cakkhiṃdiya-ghāṇiṃdiya-jibbhiṃdiya-phāsiṃdiyāiṃ niruvahayāiṃ vase vaṭṭaṃti, settaṃ iṃdiyajavaṇijje|
se kiṃ taṃ noiṃdiyajavaṇijje?
noiṃdiyajavaṇijje–jaṃ me koha-māna-māyā-lobhā vocchinnā no udīreṃti, settaṃ noiṃdiyajavaṇijje, settaṃ javaṇijje|
kiṃ te bhaṃte! avvābāhaṃ?
somilā! jaṃ me vātiya-pittiya-saṃbhiya-sannivāiyā vivihā rogāyaṃkā sarīragayā dosā uvasaṃtā no udīreṃti, settaṃ avvābāhaṃ|
kiṃ te bhaṃte! phāsuyavihāraṃ?
somilā! jaṇṇaṃ ārāmesu ujjāṇesu devakulesu sabhāsu pavāsu itthī-pasu-paṃḍagavivajjiyāsu vasahīsu phāsuesaṇijjaṃ pīḍha-phalaga-sejjā-saṃthāragaṃ uvasaṃpajjittāṇaṃ viharāmi, settaṃ phāsuyavihāraṃ
sarisavā te bhaṃte! kiṃ bhakkheyā? abhakkheyā?
somilā! sarisavā me bhakkheyā vi abhakkheyā vi|
se keṇaṭṭheṇaṃ bhaṃte! evaṃ vuccai–sarisavā me bhakkheyā vi abhakkheyā vi?
se nūnaṃ bhe somilā! baṃbhaṇṇaesu naesu duvihā sarisavā pannattā, taṃ jahā mittasarisavā ya, dhannasarisavā ya|
tattha ṇaṃ jete mittasarisavā te tivihā pannattā, taṃ jahā–sahajāyayā, sahavaḍḍhiyayā, sahapaṃsukīliyayā, te ṇaṃ samaṇāṇaṃ niggaṃthāṇaṃ abhakkheyā|
tattha ṇaṃ jete dhannasarisavā te duvihā pannattā, taṃ jahā–satthapariṇayā ya, asatthapariṇayā ya| tattha ṇaṃ jete asatthapariṇayā te ṇaṃ samaṇāṇaṃ niggaṃthāṇaṃ abhakkheyā| tattha ṇaṃ jete satthapariṇayā te duvihā pannattā, taṃ jahā–esaṇijjā ya, aṇesaṇijjā ya| tattha ṇaṃ jete aṇesaṇijjā te samaṇāṇaṃ niggaṃthāṇaṃ abhakkheyā| tattha ṇaṃ jete esaṇijjā te duvihā pannattā, taṃ jahā–jāiyā ya, ajāiyā ya| tattha ṇaṃ jete ajāiyā te ṇaṃ samaṇāṇaṃ niggaṃthāṇaṃ abhakkheyā| tattha ṇaṃ jete jāiyā te duvihā pannattā, taṃ jahā–laddhā ya, aladdhā ya| tattha ṇaṃ jete aladdhā te ṇaṃ samaṇāṇaṃ niggaṃthāṇaṃ abhakkheyā| tattha ṇaṃ jete laddhā te ṇaṃ samaṇāṇaṃ niggaṃthāṇaṃ bhakkheyā| se teṇaṭṭheṇaṃ somilā! evaṃ vuccai–sarisavā me bhakkheyā vi abhakkheyā vi|
māsā te bhaṃte! kiṃ bhakkheyā? abhakkheyā?
somilā! māsā me bhakkheyā vi, abhakkheyā vi|
se keṇaṭṭheṇaṃ bhaṃte! evaṃ vuccai–māsā me bhakkheyā vi abhakkheyā vi?
se nūnaṃ bhe somilā! baṃbhaṇṇaesu naesu duvihā māsā pannattā, taṃ jahā–davvamāsā ya, kālamāsā ya|
tattha ṇaṃ jete kālamāsā te ṇaṃ sāvaṇādīyā āsāḍhapajjavasāṇā duvālasa pannattā, taṃ jahā–sāvaṇe, bhaddavae, āsoe, kattie, maggasire, pose, māhe, phagguṇe, cette, vaisāhe, jeṭṭhāmūle, āsāḍhe| te ṇaṃ samaṇāṇaṃ niggaṃthāṇaṃ abhakkheyā|
tattha ṇaṃ jete davvamāsā te duvihā pannattā, taṃ jahā–atthamāsā ya, dhaṇṇamāsā ya|
tattha ṇaṃ jete atthamāsā te duvihā pannattā, taṃ jahā–suvaṇṇamāsā ya, ruppamāsā ya| te ṇaṃ samaṇāṇaṃ niggaṃthāṇaṃ abhakkheyā|
tattha ṇaṃ jete dhaṇṇamāsā te duvihā pannattā, taṃ jahā–satthapariṇayā ya, asatthapariṇayā ya| evaṃ jahā dhaṇṇasarisavā jāva se teṇaṭṭheṇaṃ jāva abhakkheyā vi|
kulatthā te bhaṃte! kiṃ bhakkheyā? abhakkheyā?
somilā! kulatthā me bhakkheyā vi abhakkheyā vi|
se keṇaṭṭheṇaṃ jāva abhakkheyā vi?
se nūnaṃ bhe somilā! baṃbhaṇṇaesu naesu duvihā kulatthā pannattā, taṃ jahā–itthikulatthā ya, dhaṇṇakulatthā ya|
tattha ṇaṃ jete itthikulatthā te tivihā pannattā, taṃ jahā–kulavadhuyā i vā, kulamāuyā i vā, kuladhuyā i vā| te ṇaṃ samaṇāṇaṃ niggaṃthāṇaṃ abhakkheyā|
tattha ṇaṃ jete dhaṇṇakulatthā evaṃ jahā dhaṇṇasarisavā| se teṇaṭṭheṇaṃ jāva abhakkheyā vi|
At that time, in that period, there was a city named Vāṇiyagāma—[to be described as before]; the caitya was Dūtipalāsa—[to be described as before]. In that city of Vāṇiyagāma lived a brāhmaṇa named Somila, wealthy, up to not humiliated by many people, well versed in the Ṛgveda up to thoroughly accomplished, exercising and maintaining mastery, leadership, lordship, supremacy, authority, sovereignty, and command over five hundred pupils and his own family. Then the Śramaṇa, the Lord Mahāvīra, arrived up to the assembly paid homage to him.
Then, when this news was heard by that brāhmaṇa Somila, this kind of internal, reflective, wished-for mental thought arose: “Indeed, the Śramaṇa Jñātṛputra, wandering in succession, traveling from village to village, dwelling comfortably, has arrived here, reached here, come here, and having taken up suitable lodging right here in the city of Vāṇiyagāma at the Dūtipalāsa caitya, dwells disciplining his self through self-restraint and austerity. Therefore, I shall go to the presence of the Śramaṇa Jñātṛputra and ask these matters, reasons, questions, causes, and expositions. If he answers these matters up to expositions for me, then I will pay homage, revere, and attend upon him; but if he does not answer these matters up to expositions for me, then with these very matters up to expositions I will make him one whose questioned expositions are refuted.” Having considered thus, having bathed, his body adorned with precious ornaments, he went out from his house; having gone out, accompanied by one hundred pupils on foot, he walked through the middle of the city of Vāṇiyagāma. Having gone out, he approached the Dūtipalāsa caitya, where the Śramaṇa, the Lord Mahāvīra, was; having approached and stood not far from the Śramaṇa, the Lord Mahāvīra, he spoke thus to the Śramaṇa, the Lord Mahāvīra:
“Is there spiritual progress (yātrā) for you, Venerable Sir? Is there vitality (yāpanīya) for you, Venerable Sir? Is there freedom from affliction (avyābādha) for you, Venerable Sir? Is there pure wandering (prāsuka-vihāra) for you, Venerable Sir?”
“Somila! I have spiritual progress, I have vitality, I have freedom from affliction, and I have pure wandering.”
“What is your spiritual progress, Venerable Sir?”
“Somila! My diligence in the spiritual activities of austerity, vows, self-restraint, recitation, meditation, daily obligations, and so on—that is spiritual progress.”
“What is your vitality, Venerable Sir?”
“Somila! Vitality is declared to be of two kinds: sense-faculty vitality and quasi-sense-faculty vitality.”
“What is sense-faculty vitality?”
“Sense-faculty vitality: that my ear-faculty, eye-faculty, nose-faculty, tongue-faculty, and touch-faculty remain uninjured and under control—that is sense-faculty vitality.”
“What is quasi-sense-faculty vitality?”
“Quasi-sense-faculty vitality: that my anger, pride, deceit, and greed have been severed and do not rise—that is quasi-sense-faculty vitality; that is vitality.”
“What is your freedom from affliction, Venerable Sir?”
“Somila! That my various bodily illnesses and pains arising from wind, bile, phlegm, and their combination, as well as bodily defects, are appeased and do not rise—that is freedom from affliction.”
“What is your pure wandering, Venerable Sir?”
“Somila! That in pleasure-gardens, parks, temples, assembly-halls, sheds, and lodgings free from women, animals, and eunuchs, having accepted pure and permissible stools, planks, beds, and mats, I dwell—that is pure wandering.”
“Are sarisavas edible or inedible for you, Venerable Sir?”
“Somila! Sarisavas are both edible and inedible for me.”
“Why is it said, Venerable Sir, that sarisavas are both edible and inedible for you?”
“Indeed, Somila! In brāhmaṇa doctrines, sarisavas are declared to be of two kinds: friend-sarisavas (equals) and grain-sarisavas (mustard seeds).
Therein, friend-sarisavas are declared to be of three kinds: born together, grown together, and played-in-the-dust-together; they are inedible for Śramaṇa Nirgranthas.
Therein, grain-sarisavas are declared to be of two kinds: transformed by a weapon and not transformed by a weapon. Therein, those not transformed by a weapon are inedible for Śramaṇa Nirgranthas. Therein, those transformed by a weapon are declared to be of two kinds: permissible and impermissible. Therein, those that are impermissible are inedible for Śramaṇa Nirgranthas. Therein, those that are permissible are declared to be of two kinds: begged and unbegged. Therein, those that are unbegged are inedible for Śramaṇa Nirgranthas. Therein, those that are begged are declared to be of two kinds: obtained and not obtained. Therein, those that are not obtained are inedible for Śramaṇa Nirgranthas. Therein, those that are obtained are edible for Śramaṇa Nirgranthas. For that reason, Somila, it is said that sarisavas are both edible and inedible for me.”
“Are māsas edible or inedible for you, Venerable Sir?”
“Somila! Māsas are both edible and inedible for me.”
“Why is it said, Venerable Sir, that māsas are both edible and inedible for you?”
“Indeed, Somila! In brāhmaṇa doctrines, māsas are declared to be of two kinds: substance-māsas and time-māsas (months).
Therein, time-māsas are declared to be twelve, beginning with Śrāvaṇa and ending with Āṣāḍha: Śrāvaṇa, Bhādrapada, Āśvina, Kārtika, Mārgaśīrṣa, Pauṣa, Māgha, Phālguna, Caitra, Vaiśākha, Jyeṣṭhamūla, and Āṣāḍha; they are inedible for Śramaṇa Nirgranthas.
Therein, substance-māsas are declared to be of two kinds: wealth-māsas (coins) and grain-māsas (beans).
Therein, wealth-māsas are declared to be of two kinds: gold-māsas and silver-māsas; they are inedible for Śramaṇa Nirgranthas.
Therein, grain-māsas are declared to be of two kinds: transformed by a weapon and not transformed by a weapon; in the same way as grain-sarisavas up to for that reason up to inedible as well.”
“Are kulatthas edible or inedible for you, Venerable Sir?”
“Somila! Kulatthas are both edible and inedible for me.”
“Why is it said up to inedible as well?”
“Indeed, Somila! In brāhmaṇa doctrines, kulatthas are declared to be of two kinds: woman-kulatthas (family women) and grain-kulatthas (horse-gram).
Therein, woman-kulatthas are declared to be of three kinds: family-brides, family-mothers, and family-daughters; they are inedible for Śramaṇa Nirgranthas.
Therein, grain-kulatthas [are treated] in the same way as grain-sarisavas; for that reason up to inedible as well.”
18.10.757
ege bhavaṃ? duve bhavaṃ? akkhae bhavaṃ? avvae bhavaṃ? avaṭṭhie bhavaṃ? anegabhūyabhāva-bhavie bhavaṃ?
somilā! ege vi ahaṃ jāva anegabhūya-bhāva-bhavie vi ahaṃ|
se keṇaṭṭheṇaṃ bhaṃte! evaṃ vuccai–ege vi ahaṃ jāva anegabhūya-bhāva-bhavie vi ahaṃ?
somilā! davvaṭṭhayāe ege ahaṃ, nāṇadaṃsaṇaṭṭhayāe duvihe ahaṃ, paesaṭṭhayāe akkhae vi ahaṃ, avvae vi ahaṃ, avaṭṭhie vi ahaṃ, uvayogaṭṭhayāe anegabhūya-bhāva-bhavie vi ahaṃ| se teṇaṭṭheṇaṃ jāva anegabhūya-bhāva-bhavie vi ahaṃ|
ettha ṇaṃ se somile māhaṇe saṃbuddhe samaṇaṃ bhagavaṃ mahāvīraṃ vaṃdai namaṃsai, vaṃdittā namaṃsittā evaṃ vayāsī–jahā khaṃdao jāva se jaheyaṃ tubbhe vadaha| jahā ṇaṃ devānuppiyāṇaṃ aṃtie bahave rāīsara-talavara-māḍaṃbiya-koḍuṃbiya-ibbhaseṭṭhi-senāvai-sattha vāhappabhitao muṃḍā bhavittā ṇaṃ agārāo anagāriyaṃ pavvayaṃti, no khalu ahaṃ tahā saṃcāemi, ahaṃ ṇaṃ devānuppiyāṇaṃ aṃtie duvāla-savihaṃ sāvagadhammaṃ paḍivajjissāmi jāva duvālasavihaṃ sāvagadhammaṃ paḍivajjati, paḍivajjittā samaṇaṃ bhagavaṃ mahāvīraṃ vaṃdati namaṃsati, vaṃdittā namaṃsittā jāmeva disaṃ pāubbhūe tāmeva disaṃ paḍigae|
tae ṇaṃ se somile māhaṇe samaṇovāsae jāe–abhigayajīvājīve jāva ahāpariggahiehiṃ tavokammehiṃ appāṇaṃ bhāvemāṇe viharai|
bhaṃteti! bhagavaṃ goyame samaṇaṃ bhagavaṃ mahāvīraṃ vaṃdati namaṃsati, vaṃdittā namaṃsittā evaṃ vayāsī–pabhū ṇaṃ bhaṃte! somile māhaṇe devānuppiyāṇaṃ aṃtie muṃḍe bhavittā agārāo anagāriyaṃ pavvaittae?
no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe| jaheva saṃkhe taheva niravasesaṃ jāva savvadukkhāṇaṃ aṃtaṃ kāhiti|
sevaṃ bhaṃte! sevaṃ bhaṃte! tti jāva viharai|
“Are you, sir, one? Are you two? Are you imperishable? Are you immutable? Are you constant? Are you manifold in past and present states?”
“Somila! I am one, up to I am manifold in past and present states.”
“For what reason, Venerable Sir, is it said: ‘I am one, up to I am manifold in past and present states’?”
“Somila! From the standpoint of substance, I am one; from the standpoint of knowledge and perception, I am twofold; from the standpoint of spatial units, I am imperishable, I am immutable, and I am constant; from the standpoint of conscious application, I am manifold in past and present states. For that reason, up to I am manifold in past and present states.”
Then that brāhmaṇa Somila, having been enlightened, paid homage and obeisance to the Śramaṇa, the Lord Mahāvīra. Having paid homage and obeisance, he spoke thus—just like Khaṃdaka, up to “It is just as you say. Just as, in the presence of the Beloved of the Gods, many kings, lords, chief officers, heads of households, wealthy merchants, merchant-guild leaders, army commanders, caravan leaders, and others, having shaved their heads, renounce household life for homelessness, I indeed cannot do so. I shall undertake, in the presence of the Beloved of the Gods, the twelvefold householder’s Dharma,” up to he undertook the twelvefold householder’s Dharma. Having undertaken it, he paid homage and obeisance to the Śramaṇa, the Lord Mahāvīra; having paid homage and obeisance, he returned in the very direction from which he had come.
Then that brāhmaṇa Somila became a lay disciple: having comprehended the animate and inanimate, up to he dwelt disciplining himself with the accepted acts of austerity.
Addressing him with “Venerable Sir!”, the Lord Gautama paid homage and obeisance to the Śramaṇa, the Lord Mahāvīra. Having paid homage and obeisance, he spoke thus: “Is the brāhmaṇa Somila, Venerable Sir, able to renounce household life for homelessness, having shaved his head in the presence of the Beloved of the Gods?”
“This meaning is not competent. Exactly as in the case of Śaṅkha, in full, up to he will make an end to all suffering.”
“Truly so, Venerable Sir! Truly so, Venerable Sir!” up to he dwells [content].
Translations (3)
- Viyāhapannatti: Hindi translation (Dīparatnasāgara, 2019) — Hindi
- Viyāhapannatti: Gujarati translation (Dīparatnasāgara, 2020) — Gujarati
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Commentaries (2)
- Viyāhapannatti: ṭīkānusārī vivecana — Muni Dīparatnasāgara 2000, Gujarati
- Bhagavatīvṛtti — Abhayadeva Sūri, Sanskrit