Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa ("of a hundred paths") 1.6.3

Śatapathabrāhmaṇa 1.6.3

Language
Sanskrit

1.6.3.1

tvaṣṭurha vai putraḥ | triśīrṣā ṣaḍakṣa āsa tasya trīṇyeva mukhānyāsustadyadevaṃrūpa āsa tasmādviśvarūpo nāma

Tvashtri had a three-headed, six-eyed son. He had three mouths; and because he was thus shaped, his name was Visvarûpa ('All-shape').

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.2

tasya somapānamevaikam mukhamāsa | surāpāṇamekamanyasmā a !śanāyaikaṃ tamindro didveṣa tasya tāni śīrṣāṇi praciceda

One of his mouths was Soma-drinking, one spirit-drinking, and one for other kinds of food. Indra hated him and cut off those heads of his.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.3

sa yatsomapānamāsa | tataḥ kapiñjalaḥ samabhavattasmātsababhruka iva babhruriva hi somo rājā

Now from the one which was Soma-drinking, a hazel-cock (francoline partridge) sprang forth; whence the latter is of brownish colour, for king Soma is brown.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.4

atha yatsurāpāṇamāsa | tataḥ kalaviṅkaḥ samabhavattasmātso 'bhimādyatka iva vadatyabhimādyanniva hi surām pītvā vadati

From the one which was spirit-drinking, further, a sparrow sprang; whence the latter talks as if stammering, for he who has drunk spirits, talks as if he stammered.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.5

atha yadanyasmā aśanāyāsa | tatastittiriḥ samabhavattasmātsa viśvarūpatama iva santyeva ghṛstokā iva tvanmadhustokā iva tvatparṇeṣvāścutitā evaṃ rūpaṃ hi sa tenāśanamāvayat

Then from the one which served for other kinds of food, a partridge sprang; whence the latter is much variegated in colour: on its wings, namely, butter-drops, as it were, have dropped in one place and honey- (or mead-) drops in another, for suchlike, as it were, was the food which he consumed with that (mouth).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.6

sa tvaṣṭā cukrodha | kuvinme putramavadhīditi so 'pendrameva somamājahre sa yathāyaṃ somaḥ prasuta evamapendra evāsa

Tvashtri was furious: 'Has he indeed slain my son?' he exclaimed. He brought Soma-juice from which Indra was excluded; and just as the Soma-juice on being produced had Indra excluded from it (apendra), so it remained (when it was offered up).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.7

indro ha vā īkṣāṃ cakre | idaṃ vai mā somādantaryantīti sa yathā balīyānabalīyasa evamanupahūta eva yo droṇakalaśe śukra āsa tam bhakṣayāṃ cakāra sa hainaṃ jihiṃsa so 'sya viṣvaṅṅeva prāṇebhyo dudrāva mukhāddhaivāsya na dudrāvātha sarvebhyo 'nyebhyaḥ prāṇebhyo 'dravattadadaḥ sautrāmaṇītīṣṭistasyāṃ tadvyākhyāyate yathainaṃ devā abhiṣajyan

Indra thought with himself, 'They are now excluding me from Soma!' and though uninvited, he consumed what pure (Soma) there was in the tub, even as the stronger (consumes) that of a weaker. That (Soma) however, injured him; it flowed in all directions from (the openings of) his vital airs; from his mouth alone it did not flow, but from all the other (openings of the) vital airs it flowed; hence (was instituted) at that time the ishti, called Sautrâmanî: on the occasion of that (ceremony) it is explained how the gods healed him.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.8

sa tvaṣṭā cukrodha kuvinme 'nupahūtaḥ somamababhakṣaditi sasvayameva yajñaveśasa cakre sa yo droṇakalaśe śukraḥ pariśiṣṭa āsa ta pravartayāṃ cakārendraśatrurvardhasveti so'gnimeva prāpya sambabhūvāntaraiva sambabhūvetyu haika āhuḥ so 'gnīṣomāvevābhisambabhūva sarvā vidyāḥ sarvaṃ yaśaḥ sarvamannādyaṃ sarvāṃ śrīṃ

Tvashtri was furious, and exclaimed, 'Has he indeed consumed my Soma uninvited?' However, he himself desecrated the sacrifice, for what pure (Soma) there was left in the tub he let flow (into the fire), saying, 'Grow thou, having Indra for thy foe!' The moment it reached the fire, it developed (into human shape), or, as some say, it so developed whilst on its way (to the fire). It became possessed of Agni and Soma, of all sciences, all glory, all nourishment, all prosperity.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.9

sa yadvartamānaḥ samabhavat | tasmādvṛtro 'tha yadapātsamabhavattasmādahistaṃ danuśca danāyūśca māteva ca piteva ca parijagṛhatustasmāddānava ityāhuḥ

And since it so developed whilst rolling onwards (vrit), it became Vritra; and since he sprang forth footless, therefore he was a serpent. Danu and Danâyû received him like mother and father, whence they call him Dânava.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.10

atha yadabravīdindraśatrurvardhasveti | tasmādu hainamindra eva jaghānātha yaddha śaśvadavakṣyadindrasya śatrurvardhasveti śaśvadu ha sa evendramahaniṣyat

And because he (Tvashtri) said, 'Grow thou, having Indra for thy foe!' therefore Indra slew him (Vritra). Had he said, 'Grow thou, the foe (slayer) of Indra!' he (Vritra) would certainly have forthwith slain Indra.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.11

atha yadabravīdvardhasveti | tasmādu ha smeṣumātrameva tiryaṅvardhata iśumātram prāṅkṣo vaivāvaraṃ samudraṃ dadhāvava pūrvaṃ sa yāvatsa āsa sahaiva tāvadannāda āsa

And because he (Tvashtri) said, 'Grow thou!' therefore he (Vritra) grew an arrow's range sideways and an arrow's range forward: he forced back both the western ocean and the eastern one; and in proportion as he extended did he devour the food.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.12

tasmai ha sma pūrvāhṇe devāḥ | aśanamabhiharanti madhyandine manuṣyā aparāhṇe pitaraḥ

In the fore-noon the gods offered him food, at mid-day the men, and in the after-noon the Fathers.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.13

sa vā indrastathaiva nuttaścaran | agnīṣomā upamantrayāṃ cakre 'gnīṣomau yuvaṃ vai mama stho yuvayorahamasmi na yuvayoreṣa kiṃ cana kam ma imaṃ dasyuṃ vardhayatha upa māvartethāmiti

Now while Indra was thus moving on (in pursuit of Vritra), he addressed Agni and Soma, 'Ye belong to me and I belong to you! That one is nothing to you: why then do ye support that Dasyu against me? Come over to me!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.14

tau hocatuḥ | kimāvayostataḥ syāditi tābhyāmetamagnīṣom īyamekādaśakapālam puroḍāśaṃ niravapattasmādagnīṣomīya ekādaśakapālaḥ puroḍāśo bhavati

They replied, 'What is to be our reward in that case?' He offered them that Agni-Soma cake on eleven potsherds: this is the reason why there is a cake on eleven potsherds for Agni and Soma.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.15

tāvenamupāvavṛtatuḥ | tāvanu sarve devāḥ preyuḥ sarvā vidyāḥ sarvaṃ yaśaḥ sarvamannādyaṃ sarvā śrīsteneṣṭvendra etadabhavadyadidamindra eṣa u paurṇamāsasya bandhuḥ sa yo haivaṃ vidvānpaurṇamāsena yajata etāṃ haiva śriyaṃ gacatyevaṃ yaśo bhavatyevamannādo bhavati

They went over to him, and after them went forth all the gods, all the sciences, all glory, all nourishment, all prosperity: thus by offering that (cake to Agni and Soma) Indra became what Indra now is. Such then is the significance of the full-moon offering; and he who, knowing this, performs the full-moon offering in this wise, attains to the same state of prosperity, becomes thus endowed with glory, becomes such a consumer of food (as Vritra).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.16

tadveva khalu hato vṛtraḥ | sa yathā dṛtirniṣpīta evaṃ saṃlīnaḥ śiśye yathā nirdhūtasakturbhastraivaṃ saṃlīnaḥ śiśye tamindro 'bhyādudrāva haniṣyan

Now Vritra, on being struck, lay contracted like a leather bottle drained of its contents, like a skin bag with the barley-meal shaken out. Indra rushed at him, meaning to slay him.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.17

sa hovāca | mā nu me prahārṣīstvaṃ vai tadetarhyasi yadahaṃ vyeva mā kuru māmuyā bhūvamiti sa vai me 'nnamedhīti tatheti taṃ dvedhānvabhinattasya yatsaumyaṃ nyaktamāsa taṃ candramasaṃ cakārātha yadasyāsuryamāsa tenemāḥ prajā udareṇāvidhyattasmādāhurvṛtra eva tarhyannāda āsīdvṛtra etarhītīdaṃ hi yadasāvāpūryate 'smādevaitallokādāpyāyate 'tha yadimāḥ prajā aśanamicante 'smā evaitadvṛtrāyodarāya baliṃ haranti sa yo haivametaṃ vṛtramannādaṃ vedānādo haiva bhavati

He said, 'Do not hurl (thy thunderbolt) at me! thou art now what I (was before) Only cut me in twain; but do not let me be annihilated!' He (Indra) said, 'Thou shalt be my food!' He replied, 'So be it!' He accordingly cut him in twain; and from that (part) of his which was of the Soma nature, he made the moon, and that which was demoniacal (asurya) he made enter these creatures as their belly; hence people say: 'Vritra was then a consumer of food, and Vritra is so now.' For even now, whenever that one (the moon) waxes fuller, it fills itself out of this world; and whenever these creatures crave for food, they pay tribute to this Vritra, the belly. Whosoever knows that Vritra as a consumer of food, becomes himself a consumer of food.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.18

tā u haitā devatā ūcuḥ | yā imā agnīṣomāvanvājagmuragnīṣomau yuvaṃ vai no bhūyiṣṭhabhājau stho yayorvāmidaṃ yuvayorasmānanvābhajatamiti

Those deities then said, 'Ye, Agni and Soma, whom we have followed hither, take the best part (of the sacrificial food): do let us share along with you in what ye have!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.19

tau hocatuḥ | kimāvayostataḥ syāditi yasyai kasyai ca devatāyai havirnirvapāṃstadvām purastādājyasya yajāniti tasmādyasyai kasyai ca devatāyai havirnirvapanti tatpurastādājyabhāgāvagnīṣomābhyāṃ yajanti tanna saumye 'dhvare na paśau yasyai kasyai ca devatāyai nirvapāniti hyabruvan

They both said, 'What (share) shall then be ours?' They replied, 'For whatever deity they shall take out sacrificial food, they shall in the first place offer to you some clarified butter!' Whenever, therefore, they take out sacrificial food for any deity, they in the first place offer two butter-portions to Agni and Soma. This does not take place at the Soma-sacrifice, nor at the animal offering; for they said, 'for whatever deity they take out....'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.20

sa hāgniruvāca | mayyeva vaḥ sarvebhyo juhvatu tadvo 'haṃ mayyābhajāmīti tasmādagnau sarvebhyo devebhyo juhvati tasmādāhuragniḥ sarvā devatā iti

Agni then said, 'In me they shall sacrifice for all of you, and thus I give you a share in me!' For this reason they sacrifice in Agni (the fire) to all the gods; and for this reason they say that Agni is all the deities.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.21

atha ha soma uvāca | māmeva vaḥ sarvebhyo juhvatu tadvo 'haṃ mayyābhajāmīti tasmātsomaṃ sarvebhyo devebhyo juhvati tasmādāhuḥ somaḥ sarvā devatā iti

Soma then said, 'Me they shall offer up to all of you, and thus I give you a share in me!' For this reason they offer up Soma to all the gods; and hence they say that Soma is all the deities.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.22

atha yadindre sarve devāstasthānāḥ | tasmādāhurindraḥ sarvā devatā indraśreṣṭhā devā ityetaddha vai devāstredhaikadevatyā abhavantsa yo haivametadvedaikadhā haiva svānāṃ śreṣṭho bhavati

And further, since all the gods were abiding in Indra, for that reason they say that Indra is all the deities, that the gods have Indra for their chief (sreshtha). Thus the gods came in a three-fold way to consist of one deity; and he who knows this becomes individually the chief of his own (people).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.23

dvayaṃ vā idaṃ na tṛtīyamasti | ārdraṃ caiva śuṣkaṃ ca yacuṣkaṃ tadāgneyaṃ yadārdraṃ tatsaumyamatha yadidaṃ dvayamevāpya kimetāvatkriyata ityagnīṣomayorevājyabhāgāvagnīṣomayorupāṃśuyājo 'gnīṣomayoḥ puroḍāśo yadata ekatamenaivedaṃ sarvamāpnotyatha kimetāvatkriyata ityagnīṣomayorhaivaitāvatī vibhūtiḥ prajātiḥ

Twofold, verily, is this, there is no third: to wit, the moist and the dry; and what is dry, that relates to Agni; and what is moist, that relates to Soma. But (it may be objected) if this is twofold only, why then this manifold performance:--the two butter-portions for Agni and Soma, the low-voiced offering to Agni and Soma, and the rice-cake for Agni and Soma,--when by means of any one of these he obtains all, why then this manifold performance? [The answer to this objection is that] so manifold is the power, the generative force of Agni and Soma.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.24

sūrya evāgneyaḥ | candramāḥ saumyo 'harevāgneyaṃ rātriḥ saumyā ya evāpūryate 'rdhamāsaḥ sa āgneyo yo 'pakṣīyate sa saumyaḥ

The sun, indeed, relates to Agni, and the moon to Soma; the day relates to Agni, and the night to Soma; the waxing half-moon relates to Agni, and the waning one to Soma.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.25

ājyabhāgābhyāmeva | sūryācandramasāvāpnotyupāṃśuyājenaivāhorātre āpnoti puroḍāśenaivārdhamāsāvāpnotītyu haika āhuḥ

'By means of the two butter-portions he obtains the sun and the moon; by means of the low-voiced offering he obtains the day and the night; and by means of the rice-cake he obtains the two half-moons,' thus say some.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.26

tadu hovācāsuriḥ | ājyabhāgābhyāmevāto yatame vā yatame vā dve āpnotyupāṃśuyājenaivāto 'horātre āpnoti puroḍāśenaivāto 'rdhamāsāvāpnoti sarvaṃ ma āptamasatsarvaṃ jitaṃ sarveṇa vṛtraṃ hanāni sarveṇa dviṣantaṃ bhrātṛvyaṃ hanānīti tasmādvā etāvatkriyata iti

Âsuri, on the other hand, said: 'By means of the two butter-portions he gains any two (of those objects); by means of the low-voiced offering he obtains any (other) two; and by means of the rice-cake he obtains any (other) two: "all has been obtained, all has been conquered by me! with that All I will slay Vritra; with the All I will slay the spiteful enemy!" thus he thinks, and for that reason there is this manifold performance.'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.27

tadāhuḥ | kimidaṃ jāmi kriyate 'gnīṣomayorevājyasyāgnīṣomayoḥ puroḍāśasya yadanantarhitaṃ tena jāmītyanena ha tvevājāmyājyasyetaram puroḍāśasyetaraṃ tadanyadivetaramanyadivetaram bhavatyṛcamanūcya juṣāṇena yajatyṛcamanūcyarcā yajati tadanyadivetaramanyadivetaram bhavatyanena ha tvevājāmyupāṃśvājyasya yajatyuccaiḥ puroḍāśasya sa yadupāṃśu tatprājāpatyaṃ rūpaṃ tasmāttasyānuṣṭubhamanuvākyāmanvāha vāgghyanuṣṭubvāgghi prajāpatiḥ

On this point it has also been remarked: 'Why this sameness (of performance)? By what is introduced between the butter(-offering) to Agni and Soma and the rice-cake to Agni and Soma, a repetition of performance (is committed).' Sameness (of performance), nevertheless, is avoided in this way: the one (viz. the low-voiced offering) consists of butter, and the other of a rice-cake, hence the one is different from the other. Moreover, after reciting a Rik-verse as anuvâkyâ, he pronounces the yâgyâ with the word 'pleased' (in the case of the butter-portions to Agni and Soma); and after reciting a Rik-verse as anuvâkyâ, he pronounces the yâgyâ in the form of a Rik-verse (in the case of the low-voiced offering to Agni and Soma), hence the one is (again) different from the other. Sameness of performance is also avoided in this way: in a low voice (he utters the formulas when) he offers of the butter, and with a loud voice of the cake; and what is (uttered) in a low voice, that is the manner of Pragâpati: hence he recites for that (low-voiced offering) an anushtubh-verse as the invitatory formula (anuvâkyâ), for the anushtubh represents speech, and Pragâpati also is speech.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.28

etena vai devāḥ | upāṃśuyājena yaṃyamasurāṇāmakāmayanta tamupatsarya vajreṇa vaṣaṭkāreṇāghnaṃstatho evaiṣa etenopāṃśuyājena pāpmānaṃ dviṣantam bhrātṛvyamupatsarya vajreṇa vaṣaṭkāreṇa hanti tasmādupāṃśuyājaṃ yajati

By means of that low-voiced offering the gods stealing near slew, with that thunderbolt, the vashat-call, whichever they wished of the Asuras; and so does this one, after stealing near by means of that low-voiced offering, slay with that thunderbolt, the vashat-call, the wicked, spiteful enemy. This is why he performs the low-voiced offering.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.29

sa vā ṛcamanūcya juṣāṇena yajati tadanvimā anyataratodantāḥ prajāḥ prajāyante 'sthi hyṛgasthi hi danto 'nyatarato hyetadasthi karoti

Having recited (at the butter-portions) a Rik-verse as the anuvâkyâ, he recites the yâgyâ with the word 'pleased:' in consequence of this, creatures are brought forth here with teeth on one side (in one jaw); for the Rik means bone and the tooth also is bone, so that he thereby produces bone on one side.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.30

atharcamanūcyarcā yajati | tadanvimā ubhayatodantāḥ prajāḥ prajāyante 'sthi hyṛgasthi hi danta ubhayato hyetadasthi karotyetā vā imā dvayyaḥ prajā anyataratodantāścaivobhayatodantāśca sa yo haivaṃ vidvānagnīṣomayoḥ prajātiṃ yajati bahurhaiva prajayā paśubhirbhavati

Having recited (at the low-voiced offering) a Rik-verse as the anuvâkyâ, he recites as the yâgyâ a (second) Rik-verse: in consequence of this, creatures with teeth on both sides are brought forth here; for the Rik means bone and the tooth also is bone, so that he thereby produces bone on both sides. These creatures, indeed, are of two kinds, viz. such as have teeth on one side only, and such as have teeth on both sides; and verily he who sacrifices, knowing thus the generative power of Agni and Soma, becomes rich in offspring and cattle.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.31

sa vai paurṇamāsenopavatsyan | na satrā suhita iva syāttenedamudaramasuryaṃ vlinātyāhutibhiḥ prātardaivameṣa u paurṇamāsasyopacāraḥ

When he (the sacrificer) is about to enter upon the fast of the full-moon ceremony, he may not be entirely sated. He therefore now compresses (that part of) his belly which relates to the Asuras; and next morning, by means of the oblations, that which relates to the gods. Now the practice regarding the full-moon ceremony is as follows:

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.32

sa vai saṃpratyevopavaset | saṃprati vṛtraṃ hanāni saṃprati dviṣantam bhrātṛvyaṃ hanānīti

One may (enter on the) fast at the very time (of full moon), thinking, 'Now I will slay Vritra, now I will slay the spiteful enemy!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.33

sa vā uttarāmevopavaset | samiva vā eṣa kramate yaḥ saṃpratyupavasatyanaddhā vai saṃkrāntayoryadītaro vetaramabhibhavatītaro vetaramatha ya uttarāmupavasati yathā parāñcamāvṛttaṃ saṃpiṃṣyādapratyālabhamānaṃ so 'nyatoghātyeva syādevaṃ tadya uttarāmupavasati

One may also fast only on the following day. Now he who (enters on the) fast at the very time (of full moon), gets, as it were, into collision (with some one); and when two come into collision with one another, it is indeed doubtful which of the two will get the better of the other. He, on the other hand, who prefers to fast on the second day (only), is as one who crushes from behind a retreating (enemy) before he is able to resist the attack: striking in one direction, in fact, is he who thus keeps the fast on the second day only.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.34

sa vai saṃpratyevopavaset | yathā vā anyasya hataṃ saṃpiṃṣyādevaṃ tadya uttarāmupavasati so 'nyasyaiva kṛtānukaro 'nyasyopāvasāyī bhavati tasmādu saṃpratyevopavaset

Let him therefore enter on the fast at the very time (of full moon). He who keeps the fast on the following day only is as one who finally crushes one struck down by some one else; he only does what has been done before by some one else, he only follows another's lead; let him therefore enter on the fast at the very time (of full moon).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.35

prajāpaterha vai prajāḥ sasṛjānasya | parvāṇi visasraṃsuḥ sa vai saṃvatsara eva prajāpatistasyaitāni parvāṇyahorātrayoḥ saṃdhī paurṇamāsī cāmāvāsyā cartumukhāni

After Pragâpati had created the living beings, his joints (parvan) were relaxed. Now Pragâpati, doubtless, is the year, and his joints are the two junctions of day and night (i.e. the, twilights), the full moon and new moon, and the beginnings of the seasons.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.36

sa visrastaiḥ parvabhiḥ | na śaśāka saṃhātuṃ tametairhaviryajñairdevā abhiṣajyannagnihotreṇaivāhorātrayoḥ saṃdhī tatparvābhiṣajyaṃstatsamadadhuḥ paurṇamāsena caivāmāvāsyena ca paurṇamāsīṃ cāmāvāsyāṃ ca tatparvābhiṣajyaṃstatsamadadhuścāturmāsyairevartumukhāni tatparvābhiṣajyaṃstatsamadadhuḥ

He was unable to rise with his relaxed joints; and the gods healed him by means of these havis-offerings: by means of the Agnihotra they healed that joint (which consists of) the two junctions of day and night, joined that together; by means of the full-moon and the new-moon sacrifice they healed that joint (which consists of) the full and new moon, joined that together; and by means of the (three) Kâturmâsyas (seasonal offerings) they healed that joint (which consists of) the beginnings of the seasons, joined that together.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.37

sa saṃhitaiḥ parvābhiḥ | idamannādyamabhyuttasthau yadidam prajāpaterannādyaṃ sa yo haivaṃ vidvāntsaṃpratyupavasati saṃprati haiva prajāpateḥ parva bhiṣajyatyavati hainaṃ prajāpatiḥ sa evamevānnādo bhavati ya evaṃ vidvāntsaṃpratyupavasati tasmādu saṃpratyevopavaset

With his joints thus repaired he betook himself to this food,--to the food which is here (offered) to Pragâpati; and he who, knowing this, enters upon the fast at the very time (of full moon), heals Pragâpati's joint at the proper time, and Pragâpati favours him. Thus he who, knowing this, enters upon the fast at the very time (of full moon) becomes a consumer of food: let him therefore enter on the fast at the very time (of full moon).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.38

cakṣuṣī ha vā ete yajñasya yadājyabhāgau | tasmātpurastājjuhoti purastāddhīme cakṣuṣī tatpurastādevaitaccakṣuṣī dadhāti tasmādime purastāccakṣuṣī

These two butter-portions (to Agni and Soma), truly, are the eyes of the sacrifice; he, therefore, offers them in front (of, or before, the havis), for these eyes are in the front (of the head). Hence he thereby places the eyes in the front; and for this reason these eyes are in the front (of the head).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.39

uttarārdhapūrvārdhe haike | āgneyamājyabhāgaṃ juhvati dakṣiṇārdhapūrvārdhe saumyamājyabhāgametatpurastāccakṣuṣī dadhma iti vadantastadu tadāvijñānyamiva havīṃṣi ha vā ātmā yajñasya sa yadeva purastāddhaviṣāṃ juhoti tatpurastāccakṣuṣī dadhāti yatro eva samiddhatam manyeta tadāhutīrjuhuyātsamiddhahomena hyeva samṛddhā āhutayaḥ

Some people offer Agni's butter-portion in the north-eastern part (of the fire), and Soma's butter-portion in the south-eastern part, thinking, 'Thereby we place the eyes in the front (of the head).' This, however, is rather unintelligible; for the several dishes of sacrificial food (havis) represent the body of the sacrifice; when therefore he offers in front of (or before) the havis, he thereby places the eyes in the front. Let him rather make the offerings (in that part of the fire) where he thinks the fiercest blaze is; for only by being offered in blazing (fire) are oblations successful.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.40

sa vā ṛcamanūcya juṣāṇena yajati | tasmādime asthantsatyanasthike cakṣuṣī āśliṣṭe atha yadṛcamanūcyarcā yajedasthi haiva kuryānna cakṣuḥ

Having recited (at the butter-portions) a Rik-verse as anuvâkyâ (invitatory formula), he recites by way of yâgyâ (offering-prayer) the (formula containing the word) 'pleased;' thereby these boneless eyes are set in what is bone. If, on the other hand, after reciting a Rik-verse as anuvâkyâ, he were to use a Rik-verse as the yâgyâ, he would make it bone instead of eye.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.6.3.41

te vā ete | agnīṣomayoreva rūpamanvāyatte yacuklaṃ tadāgneyaṃ yatkṛṣṇaṃ tatsaumyaṃ yadi vetarathā yadeva kṛṣṇaṃ tadāgneyaṃ yacuklaṃ tatsaumyaṃ yadeva vīkṣate tadāgneyaṃ rūpaṃ śuṣke iva hi vīkṣamāṇasyākṣiṇī bhavataḥ śuṣkamiva hyāgneyaṃyadeva svapiti tatsaumyaṃ rūpamārdre iva hi suṣupuṣo 'kṣiṇī bhavata ārdra iva hi soma ājarasaṃ ha vā asmiṃ loke cakṣuṣmānbhavati sacakṣuramuṣmiṃloke sambhavati ya evametau cakṣuṣī ājyabhāgau veda

Those two (qualities), truly, are related to the natures of Agni and Soma: that which is white is related to Agni, and that which is black is related to Soma. If, however (it were asserted), on the contrary, that what is black is related to Agni, and what is white is related to Soma,--[the answer would be:--] what sees is of the nature of Agni, for dry, as it were, are the eyes of one who looks, and that which is dry relates to Agni;--and what sleeps is of the nature of Soma, for moist, as it were, are the eyes of one who is asleep, and moist also is Soma. And, verily, he who thus knows those two butter-portions to be eyes, remains endowed with eye-sight till old age in this world, and starts in yonder world possessed of eye-sight.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

Translations (1)

Commentaries (1)

Linked texts (18)