Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s13.252

The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s13.252

Language
English

c8.s13.252

¹ e.g., Ind. Ant. Vol. XII. p. 222.— Kannara, Kanhara, Kanhâra, Kaudhara, and Kandhâra, all occur as the names of kings whose names are given in Sanskrit as Krishna.— Analogous epigraphic instances are, Bitta, = Vishnuvardhana I., Eastern Chalukya (Ind. Ant. Vol. XIX., pp. 333, 305); Bitti and Bittiga, = Vishnuvardhana, Hoysala (chapter VI. below); Dêsiṅga, = Jayasimha II., Western Châlukya (chapter IV. below); Gojjiga, = Gôvinda IV., Râshtrakûta (page 416 below); Katta, = Kârtavîrya I., Ratta of Saudatti (chapter VIII. below); Râjiga, = Râjêndra, Chôla (Ind. Ant. Vol. XX. pp. 276, 281, 282); Sattiga, = Satyâśraya, Western Châlukya (chapter IV. below); and Vikkala, = Vikramâditya VI., Western Châlukya (Dr. Hultzsch's report, dated the 30th June, 1892, pp. 3, 6).— And similar instances of the present day are, Antâji and Antû (Marâthi), and Antappa(Kanarese), = Ananta; Bâlkû and Bâlkobâ (M.), = Bâlakrishna; Chintû and Chintopant (M.), and Chintappa (K.), = Chintâmani; Dâmû (M.), = Dâmôdara; Dattû (M.), and Dattappa (K.), = Dattâtrêya; Ganû (M.), and Ganappa (K.), = Ganapati; Janû and Janobâ (M.), = Janârdana; Kusâ and Kusâbâ (M.), = Krishna; Lakhû, Lakshyâ, and Lakhyâ (M.), and Lachappa(K.), = Lakshmana; Mallû and Malhârpant (M.), and Mallappa (K.), = Mallâri; Nârû (M.), and Nârappa (K.), = Nârâyana; Narasû and Narasô (M.), and Narasappa (K.), = Narasimha; Nilû and Nilobâ (M.), = Nîlakantha; Parasû and Paraśyâ (M.), and Parasappa (K.), = Paraśurâma; Sinû and Sinappa (K.), = Śrînivâsa; Timâji (M.), and Timappa (K.) = Tryambaka; Vâsû (M.) and Vâsappa (K.), = Vâsudêva; Visû, Visobâ and Visâji (M.), = Viśvanâtha; and Vithû and Vithobâ (M.), and Vithappa (K.) = Vitthala.— I am told that the custom is to give the full Sanskrit name at the name-giving ceremony, and to introduce the Prâkrit form afterwards. And, this being so, my suggestion (Ind. Ant. Vol. XX. p. 25; see also note 9) that Bitta was expanded into its Sanskrit form when Vishnuvardhana I. was installed as Yucarâja, is perhaps untenable.