Studies in the Geography of Ancient and Medieval India c29.31
Studies in the Geography of Ancient and Medieval India c29.31
- Language
- English
c29.31
Page 144, line 26.—Read: to indicate also the ” 149, footnote 1, line 6.—Read : Gaṇeśa ” ” line 22.—Read : Vibhurāja. ” 155, line 20.—Read: identification ” 156, line 11.—Omit: It will be clear ” ” line 14.—Add at the beginning: It will be clear ” 157, line 5.—Read : Tāmralipta ” 159, line 20.—Read: Ratnagiri ” ” line 28.—Read: modern Khiching ” 163, footnote 2, line 3.—Read: Krauṃcas=tathā ” ” ” ” line 4.—Read: samudrais=tu ” ” last line.—Add :—The Harṣacarita (Parab, p. 185) refers to aṣṭādaśa-dvīpā medinī. ” 164, last line.—Read: Jagannātha-purī ” 168, footnote 1, line 2.—Read : spelt without ” ” ” ” line 3.—Read: the difficulty ” ” ” ” line 4.—Read : same form ” 170, line 3.—Read : show that ” 172, footnote 2, line 2.—Read: Dākṣiṇātya ” 173, line 20.—Read : may have belonged ” 174, line 33.—Read : of a country ” 173, 175, 177, 179, 181, 183, head line.—Read : Gaṅgā ” 178, lines 7, 11, 14.—Read : tīrtha ” ” footnote 5, line 4.—Read : saṃskāra ” 179, line 13.—Read : tīrtha ” 180, last line.—vākyāvalī ” 184, footnote 2.—Add: Cf. J. R. A. S. B., Letters, Vol. V, 1939, pp. 407 ff. ” 187, line 5.— Read : therefore lay outside. ” 189, line 15.—Read: Malay-ādhipati ” 192, line 31.—Read : Māhiṣmatī ” 193, last two lines.—Add note: Another viṣaya in Tirabhukti was Hodreya (Ep. Ind., Vol. XXIX, p. 50). ” 194, line 22.—Read : ploughshare ” 195, footnote 1, line 5.—Read Bihar and Bengal ” ” ” ” line 6.—Read: Luckeeserai. In Page 200, footnote 4, last line.—Read: *tri-lakṣīṃ dadau* ,, 201, footnote 1.—Read: *J. B. B. R. A. S.* ,, 205, line 11.—Read: area than ,, ,, footnote 2.—Add.—On the whole question, see Fleet in *J.R.A.S.*, 1912, pp. 707 ff. and V. S. Agrawala in *Jadunath Sārkar Com. Vol.*, II, pp. 14 ff. Our original interpretation of *grāma* as a unit of revenue assessment (elaborated by Agrawala as ‘one plough measure of land assessed at 1 silver Kārṣāpaṇa’) cannot be true in respect of many of the cases specified. But the number of such revenue units or income in coins may of course have been confused with that of the villages of a territory in the cases quoting very big numbers. ,, 206, last line.—Read: Gomardana ,, 208, line 14.—Read: Gonarda always ,, 213, lines 12-13.—Read: *Koṃkaṇ-Ābhīrāḥ Ākara-Veṇ-Ava(na)rtaka* ,, ,, last line.—Read: quoted in ,, ,, footnote 1, line 3.—Read: *Bṛhatsaṃhitā* ,, 215, line 3.—Read: Paṭiṭṭhān ,, 217, line 7.—Read: 477-94 A.D. ,, ,, line 8.—Read: Puṇḍravardhana ,, ,, line 11.—Read: *nagaraśreṣṭhin* ,, 218, last line.—Read: the *Mahābhārata* ,, 228, line 3.—Read: pilgrimage ,, 230, line 1.—Read: *Aṅguttaranikāya* ,, 233, line 1.—Read: the former Patiala ,, 234, line 27.—Read: *Śāhi* ,, 238, line 29.—Read: *ḍāmar-āgryasya* ,, 239, line.—Read: (East Pakistan)⁹ ,, 2.—Add : Recently my attention has been drawn to some other places of the same name; *e.g.* Dhakka on the Kabul near the eastern border of Afghanistan; Dhaka in P. S. Tilhar, Shahjahanpur Dist., U. P.; Dhaka on the northern border of the Champaran Dist., Bihar; and Jal-Dhaka in the Nilphamari Sub-Division of the Rangpur Dist., East Bengal. See *Journ. As. Soc. Pak.*, Vol. III, pp. 199 ff.