Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v5.c73.t1.468

History of Dharmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v5.c73.t1.468

Language
English

v5.c73.t1.468

Yāj. (I. 254) and Mārkaṇḍeya (28. 17-18) provide that Ekoddiṣṭa and Sapiṇḍīkaraṇa śrāddhas are performed for women also (but, not pārvaṇa nor ābhyudayika). About the Sapiṇḍīkaraṇa of the mother there are somewhat conflicting dicta. If a woman dies sonless and her husband is alive, her sapiṇḍana is effected with her mother-in-law (Gobhilasmṛti II. 102). If a woman dies leaving no son and the husband also is dead, then no sapiṇḍana can be performed for her. If she died either on the funeral pyre of her husband¹¹⁷⁴ or afterwards (as a *Satī*) then her son should perform her sapiṇḍana with her husband (i. e. the son’s father) and there is no separate sapiṇḍana for her. If she was married in the *āsura* form or she was made a *putrikā*, then the son should perform his mother’s sapiṇḍana with his maternal grandfather; while a son born of a woman married in the *Brāhma* and three other proper forms may perform her sapiṇḍana with her husband or the paternal grandmother or the maternal grandfather. In the case of these three alternatives if there is a certain family usage that should be followed; otherwise there is an option. If a woman has a step-son, the latter should perform her sapiṇḍana with his father, as Manu IX. 183 (= Vas. 17. 11) indicates. Vide the Mit on Yāj I. 253-254 and Sm. C. (on āśauca p 169) for discussion of these points and for various alternatives¹¹⁷⁵

Cites (5)