The Political Institutions and Theories of the Hindus: A Study in Comparative Politics c14.s2.23

c14.s2.23

But we need not depend on the topical analysis of the contents of these volumes for an estimate of the Hindu conception of political philosophy. For, the proper sphere or function of *nîti-śâstra* was discussed by some of the writers themselves. According to Śukra¹, *nîti-śâstra* is to dictate policies about allies, enemies and neutrals. It is expected to suggest the art of winning over the hearts of men. It is, besides, to be efficacious in diplomacy and international measures. While, on the one hand, its practical character as a manual of guidance for rulers is thus emphasized, Sukra, on the other hand, takes special care to bring out its universal importance as a *sarvopajîvaka* (useful to all) body of knowledge.² “*Nîti-śâstra*”, says he, “ministers to the interests of all and hence is followed and respected by all. It is also indispensable to the prince since he is the lord of all men and things”.³