Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge c4.8

c4.8

Subsections. The pre-Buddhistic thinkers classifiable mainly as traditionalists, rationalists and 'experientialists' on epistemological grounds (244–247) The Buddha identifies himself with the last group (248–250). The various forms of argument from authority (251–260) The criticism of anussava (revelation, tradition, report) as a valid means of knowledge (261–283). The Buddhist and the Materialist criticisms of the Vedic tradition compared and contrasted (284–288). The Buddhist criticisms in the light of the later claims made in regard to the validity of the Vedic tradition (289–293). The criticism of paramparā (claims based on the continuity of a tradition) (294–296), of hearsay (itikirā) and non-revealed tradition (297–303). The criticism of the principle of 'conformity with scripture' (piṭakasampadā) as a criterion of knowledge (304–305). The criticism of testimony (306–307). The reason for the rejection of authority (308). The general condemnation of authority (309–311). Authority within Buddhism (312).