Buddhist Philosophy in India and Ceylon c22.s5.16

c22.s5.16

³ On BS. ii. 2, 28 ff. For Nyāya criticism cf. Jacobi, JAOS. xxxi. 9 ff. ; Keith, JRAS. 1914, p. 1090 ; ILA., pp. 22 f., 99 f., 208 ff. ; NM., pp. 536 f., 548 f. ; for Mīmāṃsā, Keith, KM. pp. 46 ff. For a formal examination from a Kantian standpoint see Walleser, Der ältere Vedānta, pp. 40 ff. For Rāmānuja’s critique, see Śrībhāṣya, ii. 2. 27. Of the original sense of the Sūtra it is difficult to be certain ; cf. JAOS. xxxi. 13 ff. ; V. S. Ghate, Le Vedānta, pp. 44 f. For Sāṃkhya criticism see Aniruddha on SS. i. 42 f. ; in v. 77-9 it is shown that on either Madhyamaka or Vijñānavāda principles liberation is inconceivable ; in v. 91-3 the existence of genus is defended.