A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c30.570

v2.c30.570

kasamhitā (ed. z) and the Cakradatta have the reading accepted by the Kāśmīras. Śivadāsasena does not mention the Gauḍas in his comments on the relevant verse of the Cakradatta (kuṣṭha 8), but interprets it in the sense of the Kāśmīra recension; he does refer to the readings of the Kāśmīras and Gauḍas in his remarks ad Ca.Sū.3.3. Cakrapāṇi (ad Ca.Sū. 3.3) and the Kusumāvalī (ad Siddhayoga 51.24–28 = Ca.Sū.3–7) are silent. Niścala's Ratnaprabhā contains two references to the Gauḍas; they are mentioned in his comment ad Cakradatta, karṇaroga 19 (= Ca.Ci.26.227; compare the comments of Cakrapāṇidatta ad Ca.Ci.26.221–230 and the Kusumāvalī ad Siddhayoga 59.16–22) and nūrūha 26–27 (he refers to the interpretation of Ca.Si.3.38 according to the Gauḍas). Niścala mentions a Gauḍavyākhyā (on Caraka?) ad karṇaroga 23–24. Ḍalhaṇa (ad Su.U.42.45) and Śivadāsasena (ad Cakradatta, gulma 11 = Su.U.42.45) quote a Gauḍa school of interpretation of the Suśrutasamhitā. Śivadāsasena (ad Cakradatta, vṛṣya 25) mentions the gauḍīya identification of vārāhīkanda.