A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c30.688

v2.c30.688

32 See, for example: ABI 153–154; Gaṇanātha Sena (1924): I, 7; Gulabkunverba I, 89–92; Haridattaśarman's upodghāta to ed. ee of the Carakasamhitā, page ta; Hemarājaśarman's upodghāta, 49; Jyotir Mitra (1974): 65–66; G. Mukhopādhyāya (1913/14): I, 5–9; G. Mukhopadhyaya (HIM III, 610–613); the sampādakīya to ed. hh of the Carakasamhitā; P.Rāy and H.N. Gupta (1965); P.K. Sanyal (1964): 55; Tārācand Śarmā (1981/82): 89–94; R. Śāstrī (1977): 521–526; Satyaprakāś (1960): 104–106; P.V. Sharma (1970a) and (1992d); ed. kk of the Carakasamhitā, Intr. IX–X; V. Śukla (1977): I, 46; Sūramcandra (1978): 295–301; Vṛddhatrayī 15–17. R.F.G. Müller (1932: 803–808; 1951: 21–22) rejects the identity because of his conviction that the Carakasamhitā does not show any Buddhist influence and because obstetrical surgery is not one of its subjects.