A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c30.866

v2.c30.866

25 Probably the Ātreyasamhitā = Hāritasamhitā is meant. 26 Ad Rasendrasārasamgraha 1.65–67 (a description of the kavacīyantra), 127 (a description of the dolāyantra), 130 (a description of gajaputa). 27 The Ātreyasamhitā is also mentioned as one of the sources. 28 Ad Rasaratnasamuccaya 2.26 (a description of the kosthikāyantra), 9.41 (a description of the bhūdharayantra), 25.58–60 (a description of the cakrayantra). 29 Todara II: 1.37 introduces 1.38 (= Hārita I.2.16); 1.39–40 contains a comment on Hārita's verse. 30 See P.V. Sharma (1985e): 14–15. 31 See on her, for example: Dowson; Hopkins; Vettam Mani. 32 See Ātreya. 33 Vrddhatrayī 75–76. See, for example: Dowson; Hopkins; F.E. Pargiter (1969): I, 99–100; Vettam Mani; H.H. Wilson (1972): 70, 313. 34 Gulabkunverba I, 145. H. Parādkar 17. Gaṇanātha Sena (1924: I, 23). A medical Atrisamhitā is said to be well known in the Pañjāb (HIM II, 429; VŚS, Preface 5). 35 Buddhacarita 1.43. 36 Rechung (1973): 12. Rechung confuses Atri with a sage called Lha-min-hjoms. 37 NCC II, 67–68 and 406. Compare on Ātreya: bhikṣu Ātreya, Atri, Kṛṣṇātreya, Hāritasamhitā. 38 The Caraka- and Bhelasamhitā are treatises said to belong to the school of Ātreya; the Hāritasamhitā represents a different medical tradition. 39 See, for example: F.E. Pargiter (1922). 40 See A.A. Macdonell and A.B. Keith (1967); H. Oldenberg (1888): 227–228. The members of Atri's family are called Atris in the Rgveda, not yet Ātreyas. 41 See J. Filliozat (1975): 6. 42 Rgveda 5.3, 4, 5, 6 are attributed to him. 43 Rgveda 5.25 and 26 are ascribed to him. 44 G.S. Ghurye (1979): 251. 45 See on this śākhā: H.Th. Colebrooke (1873): I, 16 and 74; L. Renou (1947): 134; A. Weber (1850a): 71, 73, 75, *(1852): 86–89, (1855a). R. Śāstrī (1977: 515) says that Ātreya belonged to the Aukhiyaśākhā, a subdivision of the Kaṭha school of the Taittirīyas. 46 Jyotir Mitra and Satya Pal Gupta (1966): 14. 47 D. Chattopadhyaya (1986): 443, n. 86. The NCC (VIII, 209–210 and 256) mentions the Tribhāṣyaratna as a commentary by Somayārya. 48 See on the purohita: R. Fick (1974): 107–117; J. Gonda (1955); E.W. Hopkins (1969): 380; A.A. Macdonell and A.B Keith (1967): I, 113–114; D. Seyfort Ruegg (1995): 50–52. 49 Aitareyabrāhmaṇa 8.22 (see A.B. Keith, 1971: 337). 50 Brhadāraṇyakopaniṣad 2.6.3 and 4.6.3. 51 A.A. Macdonell and A.B Keith (1967): I, 57. Compare PW (s.v. ātreya). See Aitareyabrāhmaṇa 7.1; Kātyāyanaśrautasūtra 10.2.21; Śatapathabrāhmaṇa 4.3.4.21. See J. Eggeling's notes to his translation of the Śatapathabrāhmaṇa (II, 346). See also S.W. Jamison (1991): 185. An Ātreya plays the part of a scapegoat during the horse sacrifice (A.B. Keith, 1976: I, 262–263). Noteworthy is the use of the term ātreyī for a woman soon after her period, hence more likely to conceive; see on ātreyī: S.W. Jamison (1991): 213–222. 52 Gaṇa 15 (aśvādayaḥ) ad Aṣṭādhyāyī 4.1.110 (see on this gaṇa: R. Birwé, 1961: 108–113).