A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c35.51

v2.c35.51

635 Cf. Ca.Sū.18.26 (due to pitta) and Si.9.71–72 (due to blood, pitta and vāta); Su.U.25.16cd–18 (due to vāta, with kapha, pitta and blood as secondary agents). 636 Cf. Ca.Si.9.79–81c (due to vāta and blood); Su.U.25.11cd–13ab (due to the three doṣas; Daḷhaṇa remarks that others regard it as arising from vāta and pitta). 637 Suśruta adds anantavāta as the eleventh śiroroga. 638 This group is an innovation. Compare Śārṅgadharasaṃhitā I.7.151cd–152. 639 Absent from Caraka- and Suśrutasaṃhitā. Cakra remarks (ad Ca.Ci.12.75ab) that śiraḥśotha (a local swelling of the head) is identical with the disorder called upaśīrṣaka, described in another treatise. Compare Śārṅgadharasaṃhitā I.7.151cd–152 and 187. 640 The term aruṣkā is found in the Carakasaṃhitā (Sū.13.35; Cakra remarks that aruṣkā is the same as arūṃṣikā). See also Su.Ni.13.36, where the kṣudraroga called aruṃṣikā is described. 641 Śivadāsasena mentions ukhī as its vernacular name. Cf. Su.Ni.13.35, where the kṣudraroga called dāruṇaka is described; Daḷhaṇa remarks that it is commonly known as pahā. 642 Cf. Su.Ni.13.33–34 (a kṣudraroga). 643 Also mentioned as a synonym of indralupta in the Suśrutasaṃhitā (Ni.13.34); Gayadāsa, quoting Bhoja, adds the synonyms khallī and ruhyā. The Mādhavanidāna (55.28–29 = Su. Ni.33–34) has ruhyā instead of rujyā. Kārttika distinguished ruhyā from indralupta and khālitya (= khalati) (see the Madhukośa ad Mādhavanidāna 55.28–29). Hilgenberg and Kirfel read rūdhyā instead of rujyā. 644 A rare term (also used at U.24.24). Compare Rasaratnasamuccaya 24.87 (cācāroga). 645 Called khālitya in the Suśrutasaṃhitā (Ni.13.34), khaliti by Videha (see Gayadāsa and Daḷhaṇa ad Su.Ni.13.33–34). 646 See on Kārttika’s opinion about the differences among indralupta, khālitya and ruhyā: Śrīkaṇṭhadatta ad Mādhavanidāna 55.28–29. Khālitya occurs in males only according to Videha (see Gayadāsa and Daḷhaṇa ad Su.Ni.13.33–34; Śrīkaṇṭhadatta ad Mādhavanidāna 55.28–29). Śrīkaṇṭhadatta does not agree with Videha, because exceptions to the latter’s rule are observed. 647 Compare Su.Ni.13.37, where palita is a kṣudraroga. 648 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.158–159; Su.U.26.3–11. 649 Cf. Ca.Si.9.77–78; Su.U.26.31cd–36ab. 650 Cf. Ca.Si.9.82–83; Su.U.26.30cd–31ab. 651 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.176–179; Su.U.26.12–18ab. 652 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.180–182; Su.U.26.18cd–23 and 35–36ab. 653 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.183ab; Su.U.26.24ab. 654 The same as jantu in U.23. 655 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.183cd–187ab; Su.U.26.26cd–30ab. 656 Cf. Su.Ci.20.27cd–29cd. 657 Cf. Su.Ci.20.29ef–30. 658 Haryarjuṇalomabhāva is mentioned at Ca.Ci.26.109, hariloman at Ca.Ci.26.262 and 279. 659 A.h.U.24.37–38ab is very close to Ca.Ci.26.264cd–266ab, 38cd–39ab to Ca.Ci.26.266cd–267ab. 660 A.h.U.24.39cd–40ab is very close to Ca.Ci.26.278cd–279ab. 661 Compare the prescriptions against khālitya, palita, etc., and those blackening the hair, which are found in the Carakasaṃhitā (Ci.26.262cd–282) and Suśrutasaṃhitā (Ci.25.28cd–42). A.h.U.24.40cd–41ab is close to Ca.Ci.26.279cd–280ab.