A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c36.122

v2.c36.122

151 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 152 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 153 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 154 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 155 Cf. A.h.Ci.12.10ab. 156 Cf. A.h.Ci.12.17cd–19ab. 157 Cf. A.h.Ci.12.19cd–24 (dhānvantaraghṛta). 158 Cf. A.h.Ci.12.10cd–14. The Samgraha does not refer to the śrīkukkuṭakhalaka of the Hṛdaya (Ci.12.12; see Aruṇa’s remarks). 159 Cf. A.h.Ci.12.25–28 (rodhrāsava). 160 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 161 Compare the ayaṣkṛti of the Hṛdaya (Ci.12.29–32). 162 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 163 Cf. A.h.Ci.12.33. 164 Cf. A.h.Ci.12.36cd–38ab. 165 Cf. A.h.Ci.12.38cd–41. 166 Cf. A.h.Ci.12.42–43ab. 167 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 168 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 169 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 170 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.1. 171 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.8–19ab. The Samgraha omits the treatment of vidradhi due to vāta, pitta, kapha, blood, and vidradhi of the āgantu type (see A.h.Ci.13.2–7). 172 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.19–20. 173 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.21–22ab. The Hṛdaya mentions a period of ten or twelve days. 174 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.22cd–24c. 175 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.24cd. The Samgraha omits the treatment of an abscess with guggulu and śilājatu (see A.h.Ci.13.25cd–26ab). 176 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.26cd. 177 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.27cd. 178 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.28–29ab. 179 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.29cd–31. 180 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.32. 181 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.33–35ab. 182 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.35cd–38. 183 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.39–40ab. 184 Cf. A.h.Ci.13.40b–47. Gandharvahastataila is not described in the Hṛdaya. 185 This passage resembles one on the same subject, found in the Carakasamhitā (Ni.3.16–17). 186 Cf. A.h.Ci.14.1 and 26–27ab. The Samgraha is more elaborate than the Hṛdaya. 187 Cf. A.h.Ci.14.11–13ab. 188 Cf. A.h.Ci.14.22cd–25. 189 Cf. A.h.Ci.14.13cd–21ab. 190 Cf. A.h.Ci.14.21cd–22ab. 191 Cf. A.h.Ci.14.2–3. 192 Cf. A.h.Ci.14.4–6. 193 Cf. A.h.Ci.14.27cd–31ab.